Rifleman Q&A: Hammerless Shotgun Storage

by
posted on February 18, 2022
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
RIght side of shotgun side-by-side gun wood metal steel engraving gold
Shown here is a Winchester Model 21 side-by-side shotgun.

Q. I am confused about the proper handling of hammerless shotguns. Everyone has heard the advice “never dry-fire a gun, the firing pin may break.” If the gun has an exposed hammer, it can be eased down, but how should I handle a hammerless single- or double-barreled gun. Should I leave a spent shell or snap-cap in the chamber? It just doesn’t seem right to store the gun in the cocked mode. I think this could put much wear on the springs causing loss of tension.


A. Unfortunately, there is no cut-and-dried rule regarding dry-firing shotguns. Some, such as the Remington 3200, A.H. Foxes and the Winchester Model 21, can be dry-fired without damage because their strikers, the proper name for shotgun firing pins, are integral with the hammers. However, in general, any shotgun is better off being dry-fired using a snap cap. You can use a fired shell, but because the primer is already indented, the striker will go farther than with a snap cap with a resilient center. Hammer guns should only be dry-fired with a snap cap, although, as you say, the hammer can be eased down for storage.

There is controversy regarding storing double guns cocked and uncocked. I prefer to uncock them, although in so doing the ejector springs remain in the stressed position. It is easy to uncock a double gun. With the action open and the chambers empty, the trigger or triggers are pulled, and the action is then slowly closed as the hammer is eased down.

Regardless of whether or not shotguns are stored with their hammers cocked or uncocked, it is best that they be kept uncased with the muzzles down, so that any excess lubricant will drain toward the muzzle, preventing the softening of the wood.

—John M. Taylor


This “Questions & Answers” was featured in the May 2005 issue of American Rifleman. At time of publication, "Questions & Answers" was compiled by Staff, Ballistics Editor William C. Davis, Jr., and Contributing Editors: David Andrews, Hugh C. Birnbaum, Bruce N. Canfield, O. Reid Coffield, Charles Q. Cutshaw, Charles M. Fagg, Angus Laidlaw, Evan P. Marshall, Charles E. Petty, Robert B. Pomeranz, O.D., Jon R. Sundra, Jim Supica, A.W.F. Taylerson, John M. Taylor and John W. Treakle.

Latest

Resurgence Of 2
Resurgence Of 2

New Digital Surveillance Tools Threaten Gun Owner Privacy

Technology contained within new digital surveillance hardware recently introduced by defense contractor Leonardo could conceivably track who has recently purchased firearm and where they're taking it.

First Look: Shell Tech Ammo Dog Bowl

The materials used in your dog’s bowl matter for all the same reasons the materials in your own water bottle matter. That's why this dog bowl from Shell Tech Ammo is worth looking at.

Pony Power: Colt Launches Optics Division with VMR Riflescopes

Colt Optics grew out of a market where military, law enforcement and civilian customers increasingly expect a firearms manufacturer to offer a complete package that goes beyond just the firearm

The Mysterious Mondragón: Mexico's Unique Self-Loading Military Rifle

Flawed in many ways, the Model 1908 Mondragón offered a preview of infantry rifles to come. And the circumstances of the Mondragón’s birth showed that not all firearm innovation comes from the hallowed halls of Springfield, Colt, Mauser or Enfield. 

Meet an Australian Visiting America to Warn Us

Australian political commentator Topher Field has come to America on its 250th birthday to speak and meet people and to bring the message that Australia’s gun confiscation should not be used as a template for the United States.

NRA-ILA’s John Commerford on What’s to Come for America’s Rifle

When the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear two cases—Grant v. Higgins and Viramontes v. Cook County, Illinois—that challenge bans on popular semi-automatic rifles in its next term, fear and trepidation ran like tremors through the public statements of anti-gun groups and the politicians they support.

Interests



Get the best of American Rifleman delivered to your inbox.