Video: Shooting the Japanese Type 3 Taisho Machine Gun

by
posted on December 9, 2019
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
When we think of Japanese heavy machine gun firepower during World War II, we typically think of the Type 92. It was christened the "woodpecker" by the troops because of its distinctively slow 450-round-per-minute cyclic rate of fire, but it was also respected as being an effective and dangerous combat arm. While the Japanese ultimately produced more than 45,000 Type 92s and the gun commanded a prolific reputation in service during the 1930s and 1940s, it is worth remembering that it evolved from a predecessor that is somewhat less familiar in the history of small arms: the Type 3. 





Adopted in 1914, the Type 3 entered service at a time when the standard Japanese military cartridge was 6.5x50 mm. The Type 38 rifle was chambered for it and, accordingly, so was the Type 3 heavy machine gun. General Kijirō Nambu (1869-1949) based the design on the French Hotchkiss Model 1914, so it is gas operated, fires from the open bolt, and feeds from Hotchkiss style 30-round feed strips. An oil reservoir mounted on top of the receiver lubricates cartridges as they feed into the action. It is air cooled and makes use of 25 large heat dissipating cooling fins machined into the barrel sleeve as well as 33 smaller fins on the barrel itself. The combination of slow cyclic rate and cooling fins means that the Type 3 mitigates heat effectively and is, therefore, capable of laying down a sustained volume of heavy fire.




By the early 1930s, the Type 3 was serving the Japanese military alongside the Type 38 rifle and the Type 11 light machine gun, but the reality of modern combat was changing, and the Japanese recognized a need for a harder hitting cartridge than the 6.5x50 mm. They would, in the end, develop 7.7x58 mm from the .303 British cartridge that was used by the Imperial Navy's Type 92 light machine gun. The Type 92 heavy machine gun is a simple conversion of the Type 3 to the new caliber with a few minor modifications. The Type 92 entered service in 1932 and went on to fight the Americans, the British, the Chinese, the Dutch, the Australians, etc. until the bitter end in 1945. While the Type 92 is certainly the better known of the two heavy machine guns, the Type 3 did some fighting during the Second World War as well albeit in a reserve role. It even went on to fight U.N. forces in Korea in the 1950s. The Type 3 is not common in the U.S. today, but there are examples on the NFA registry and our staff recently had the opportunity to fire an especially nice one while filming an upcoming episode of American Rifleman TV in Louisiana. 

Latest

Wilson Combat Bulwark 01
Wilson Combat Bulwark 01

Beyond the 1911: Wilson Combat's New Bulwark

The Bulwark is designed as a “hard-use service pistol” that combines the best features of a 1911 with those of a daily-carry duty gun, and Wilson Combat delivers it all at a price point below Wilson’s traditional handgun offerings.

Rifleman Review: Walther Arms PDP Pro-X PMM

Recently, Walther Arms has combined several PDP feature sets with a Parker Mountain Machine compensator to produce the Pro-X PMM.

The DOJ Civil Rights Division Strikes Again

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) just opened an investigation to “determine whether Philadelphia Police use a vague ‘good cause’ standard to cancel permits to carry legal firearms.”

Review: Smith & Wesson M&P FPC 5.7

Having more guns chambered in 5.7 mm is a great thing, and the Smith & Wesson M&P FPC 5.7 is a welcome addition to the growing world of 5.7 mm firearms.

Ruger Moves HQ to North Carolina

Ruger quietly relocated its corporate headquarters from Southport, Conn., to Mayodan, N.C., marking the end of the company's management presence in the town where it was founded in 1949.

Honest EDC: A Realistic Assessment of Your Concealed Carry Kit

The problem is not that most concealed-carry loadouts are bad. The problem is that most concealed-carry kits are never re-examined against reality.

Interests



Get the best of American Rifleman delivered to your inbox.