Supreme Court Overturns Bump Stock Ban

by
posted on June 14, 2024
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
Bumps

In a 6-3 decision, the United States Supreme Court ruled that a standing ban on bump stocks is unlawful. In a majority opinion delivered by Associate Justice Clarence Thomas, the court ruled that a “...semiautomatic rifle equipped with a bump stock is not a ‘machinegun’ because it does not fire more than one shot ‘by a single function of the trigger.’”

“The Supreme Court has properly restrained executive branch agencies to their role of enforcing, and not making, the law,” said NRA-ILA Executive Director Randy Kozuch. “This decision will be pivotal to NRA’s future challenges of ATF regulations.”

The National Rifle Association supported the case with an amicus curiae, or friend of the court, brief in Garland v. Cargill, a case where respondent Michael Cargill had purchased two bump stocks several months before the ATF published a final rule that amended the regulatory definition of “machinegun” to include bump stocks by adding the language: “The term ‘machine gun’ includes bump-stock devices, i.e., devices that allow a semiautomatic firearm to shoot more than one shot with a single pull of the trigger by harnessing the recoil energy of the semi-automatic firearm to which it is affixed so that the trigger resets and continues firing without additional physical manipulation of the trigger by the shooter.”

The final rule determined that owners of bump stocks had to divest themselves of the accessories by the effective date of March 26, 2019. On March 25, 2019, Cargill surrendered his bump stocks to the ATF, and on the same day, he filed suit in the Western District of Texas to challenge the rule. A bench trial ruled in favor of the ATF’s final rule, a judgement affirmed by a three-judge panel United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Following an additional argument, the en banc court reversed and remanded the judgement.

In April 2023, Attorney General Merrick Garland petitioned the United States Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari, which was granted on November 3. Oral arguments were heard on Feb. 28, 2024.

Latest

Beretta’s three arrow logo
Beretta’s three arrow logo

500 Years in Business: Beretta’s Staying Power

Once Italian, now global, always family-owned; Beretta, the world’s oldest industrial firm, balances continuity and new ideas in its 500-year-old pursuit of gunmaking perfection.

A Traditional Turn: The Derya EX1300 & EX1400 Shotguns

While the company is mostly known for radically modern shotgun designs, Derya's new EX1300 and EX1400 are wood-stocked, break-action shotguns designed for the skeet range or hunting field. 

I Carry: Daniel Defense H9 in an ANR Designs Holster

In our latest “I Carry” segment above, we’re taking a closer look at the Daniel Defense H9, a unique, striker-fired design that borrows popular features from several different handguns. 

A Surprising Conversation on Just How Far an Anti-Gun State Can Go

In Massachusetts this fall, ballot question 9 is an effort to repeal 2024 legislation known as “An Act Modernizing Firearm Laws,” a complex package of fees, red tape, training requirements, and other burdens placed on law-abiding gun owners. 

The Armed Citizen® Oct. 2, 2026

Read today's "The Armed Citizen" entry for real stories of law-abiding citizens, past and present, who used their firearms to save lives.

Are Snub-Nose Revolvers Still Relevant?

In a world of micro-compact handguns, does the venerable snub-nose revolver still have a place? Here are four reasons why you might still consider carrying a snubby.

Interests



Get the best of American Rifleman delivered to your inbox.