Rifleman Q&A: Lead Weights In Buttstocks?

posted on February 25, 2020
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
merged.jpg

Q: I have a Winchester Model 1892 with Serial No. 426XXX, and it is chambered for .25-20 Win. I recently disassembled the rifle for cleaning and stumbled across an oddity I’d yet to experience with firearms. Behind the buttplate of the stock was a hole drilled into the wood, and inside the hole were two, 3/4-oz. lead sinkers wrapped in a Red Cross Salt bag. What would be the reason for this type of modification?

A: I’ve had the good fortune to spend several decades in the role of gunsmith, and during that period I’ve discovered many interesting—and a few extraordinary—items hidden under buttplates. Most common were hunting licenses (a few actually being historically significant), statements of ownership, letters and even money.

A substantial number of objects consisted of lead, usually shot, but often sheets or small ingots, and, once, evidence of molten lead having been poured into the cavity. In every case the owner claimed to have no knowledge of these items, and, in truth, most of the firearms were quite old and typically shotguns.

It is my opinion that the placement of lead into the butt of the gun was done primarily to lessen felt recoil. Whether it had the desired effect is anybody’s guess, but the laws of physics do support the concept. How much lead is required will depend on the initial weight of the gun and the recoil generated.

The .25-20 Winchester cartridge in a firearm of this size does not produce sufficient recoil to inhibit the vast majority of shooters. I can report from experience that the long-barrel, rifle versions of the Model 92 are very “front-heavy,” at least compared to the carbine versions. In addition, because the bore is decidedly smaller than the larger chamberings, the .32-20 Win. and especially the .25-20 Win., have a balance point considerably further forward. More weight to the rear would improve the balance.

Because the lead weights are certainly not conveniently available, it would seem unlikely that they were placed there for any reason other than dead weight, perhaps simply to make the rifle easier to carry.

Latest

Wilson Combat Bulwark 01
Wilson Combat Bulwark 01

Beyond the 1911: Wilson Combat's New Bulwark

The Bulwark is designed as a “hard-use service pistol” that combines the best features of a 1911 with those of a daily-carry duty gun, and Wilson Combat delivers it all at a price point below Wilson’s traditional handgun offerings.

Rifleman Review: Walther Arms PDP Pro-X PMM

Recently, Walther Arms has combined several PDP feature sets with a Parker Mountain Machine compensator to produce the Pro-X PMM.

The DOJ Civil Rights Division Strikes Again

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) just opened an investigation to “determine whether Philadelphia Police use a vague ‘good cause’ standard to cancel permits to carry legal firearms.”

Review: Smith & Wesson M&P FPC 5.7

Having more guns chambered in 5.7 mm is a great thing, and the Smith & Wesson M&P FPC 5.7 is a welcome addition to the growing world of 5.7 mm firearms.

Ruger Moves HQ to North Carolina

Ruger quietly relocated its corporate headquarters from Southport, Conn., to Mayodan, N.C., marking the end of the company's management presence in the town where it was founded in 1949.

Honest EDC: A Realistic Assessment of Your Concealed Carry Kit

The problem is not that most concealed-carry loadouts are bad. The problem is that most concealed-carry kits are never re-examined against reality.

Interests



Get the best of American Rifleman delivered to your inbox.