Keefe Report: Executive Order Not So Smart for Police and Soldiers

by
posted on January 6, 2016
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
goverment_overstepping.jpg

Among his other anti-gun, politically motivated executive orders, under “Shaping the Future of Gun Safe Technology” Barack Obama has imposed an imperial dictum to “Issue a Presidential Memorandum directing the Department of Defense, Department of Justice, and Department of Homeland Security to take two important steps to promote smart-gun technology.” According to the White House Fact Sheet, those steps are “Increase research and development efforts” ...  and “Promote the use and acquisition of new technology.” The result would be for “the departments to consult with other agencies that acquire firearms and take appropriate steps to consider whether including such technology in specifications for acquisition of firearms would be consistent with operational needs.”

Instead of involving countless man hours and reports, the president could have just asked somebody who knows. The answer is, no, we shouldn't do that. Border Patrol Agents, U.S. Marshalls and U.S. Marines are not clamoring for this experimental technology to do their jobs. So-called “smart gun" technology, at least at this point, would endanger the lives of soldiers and federal law enforcement officers.

At a time when our nation is at war and there are terrorist incidents occurring in our own shores, you’d think that federal law-enforcement and our military would have better things to do.

So-called “smart gun" technology is nowhere near being ready for field or “operational” use by law-enforcement or the military. And despite this executive order, the U.S, military and law-enforcement agencies around the world have already been watching this technology develop. And they have stayed on the sidelines for good reason.

There are some attractive features in this technology, especially for police administrators. One of which is you can turn a police officer's gun off remotely using RFID technology. I have written about this before, and the thing to remember is that, if an administrator can remotely deactivate a police officer's firearm, so can a sophisticated hacker. Remember those Office of Personnel Management records of millions of federal employees and their friends and families? Yeah, they thought those were safe, too.

There are some benefits to RFID technology when it comes to military equipment. Specifically, using passive RFID chips to track them for inventory control purposes—think price check on aisle three at Walmart—and active RFID can locate them remotely. If say, a Bradley AFV or M2 belt-fed machine gun went missing, it might be nice to use an app on your smart phone to go find it. But if you can find it, again, so can the enemy.

Another so-called “smart gun” feature is Wide Area Control. What this does is allow, by satellite, all firearms so-equipped to be remotely deactivated within a given area or region. Again, this seems like it might be attractive to administrators, but for police officers and soldiers on the ground it would make them vulnerable to hacking or even simple geography. Oh, you crossed the county line, congratulations, deputy, your pistol doesn’t work now.

Administrators all over the world have been interested in so-called “smart gun” technology, especially in countries that would just as soon not have their officers armed anyway. How many of them have adopted it? Zero. Let me repeat that, zero.

Anti-gun mayors and bureaucrats would love it if their police agencies would carry so-called “smart guns.” Like this executive order, it would advance their agenda. But the most resistance to this idea comes from the police officers themselves.

There is a reason why law-enforcement agencies and military procurement officers thoroughly test firearms under all kinds of conditions before adoption. They need to know that when it comes time to use that arm it has to work 100 percent of the time. The roles of a firearm in the holster of a first responder or in the hands of a frontline infantryman are very different from that of a casual shooter that wants a Buck Rogers .22 for plinking at the local indoor range.

Soldiers sometimes have to fight battles in the rain, in the mud and in areas with lots of dirt, or even salt water. The salt-spray immersion test military firearms must undergo before adoption seems to me something that would easily defeat so-called “smart gun” designs as well as their Batman decoder rings and Dick Tracy wrist watches.

There's nothing wrong with the development of new technology when it comes to firearms, including so-called “smart guns.” The problem comes when politicians who don't know an Obregon from an oboe mandate their use. Playing political games with arms that our soldiers and first responders rely upon to defend their lives or take down or nation’s enemies is dangerous folly. And it is insidious to insist armed citizens use such technology when it is clear police and the military will not.

Instead of squandering man hours and resources, the president could have just turned to one of the armed Secret Service agents who protect his life 24 hours a day and ask “Hey, do you guys want to carry these things?" Sometimes, even the president should just ask a guy.

 

 

Latest

Stuart 45 Pistol Pre War Manuevers Web Main
Stuart 45 Pistol Pre War Manuevers Web Main

Guns Of The U.S. Tankers In World War II

Since the end of World War II, debates have raged about the effectiveness of American armored fighting vehicles in that conflict. Despite all the Monday morning armored quarterbacking, American AFVs were war-winners, driven to victory by some the finest fighting men our nation has ever produced.

MidwayUSA Foundation Awards Over $14 Million In Cash Grants In 2025

In honor of National Shooting Sports Month—held annually in August—along with the growing popularity of the sport with new participants, MidwayUSA Foundation announced it has distributed more than $14.2 million in cash grants to support youth shooting sports in 2025.

Making The KelTec PR57 In Wyoming

To make its PR57 handgun, KelTec invested in an entirely new manufacturing facility located in Rock Springs, Wyo. "American Rifleman Television" headed out for an inside look at the company's efficient production process.

Taurus 66 Combat: A New "Fighting Revolver"

First introduced in the 1970s, the Taurus 66 Combat is a medium-frame revolver that has seen several evolutions in its lifetime, and the latest update creates what the company considers "the final word in fighting revolvers."

Review: Taurus GX2

From cars to cellphones, as a product gets more sophisticated, it usually also gets more expensive. And, as modern handguns get more modular and optic-ready, their prices tend to go up.

Rifleman Q&A: A Garand Puzzlement

"We are a father-and-son NRA member tandem in search of an answer regarding the branding of an M1 Garand rifle. We own an M1 rifle that has markings indicating it was a “lend lease to England,” and it also has a .308 barrel/sleeve."

Interests



Get the best of American Rifleman delivered to your inbox.