Will Canada Attempt a Door-to-Door Gun Confiscation?

by
posted on April 23, 2026
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **

Canada’s federal government has been moving since 2020 to ban and then seize a vast array of mostly semi-automatic firearms. In March, Canada’s federal Assault-Style Firearms Compensation Program wrapped up its declaration phase with only about 67,000 guns turned in—compliance rates are estimated to be only in the single digits. The country’s amnesty period for having one or more of these firearms runs until Oct. 30, 2026; after that, owners of any of the more than 2,500 newly prohibited models must surrender, deactivate or destroy their guns or face possible criminal charges. This is no “buyback.” It is mandatory confiscation of legally owned property.

For a first-person account of what is going on in Canada, including what is being done to push back against this massive grab of Canadian’s freedom, The Armed Citizen Podcast reached out to Blair Hagen, executive vice president of Canada’s National Firearms Association.

“Basically, what has been happening is [our federal government is] giving people the opportunity to register their now banned order in council guns in a registry for future confiscation at some later date,” said Hagen.

Hagen explained that “at this point in time, [we estimate] 2 percent compliance. And this is voluntary compliance. The government is now scrambling to figure out what to do next.”

This gun-confiscation scheme began in May 2020 when the Liberal government prohibited over 1,500 semi-automatic rifles and variants. The banned list was later expanded through regulations and Bill C-21. These are sporting rifles, hunting guns and collectibles owned by law-abiding citizens. Provinces like Alberta and Saskatchewan resisted cooperation, and many police departments refused to prioritize collection, citing strained resources. The cost of this move to disarm the Canadian citizens of popular firearms has continued to exceed early claims.

Nevertheless, the federal government in Canada has continued to push this forward. Canadians, meanwhile, do not have constitutional right to keep and bear arms, but, as Hagen explains in this video interview, it does have protections in British common law.

Whether, after Oct. 30, 2026, the federal government in Canada will escalate to door-to-door confiscation or whether they will be forced in the courts and legislatures to confront the failure of a policy that trades liberty for an illusion of control remains to be seen.

Latest

Resurgence Of 2
Resurgence Of 2

New Digital Surveillance Tools Threaten Gun Owner Privacy

Technology contained within new digital surveillance hardware recently introduced by defense contractor Leonardo could conceivably track who has recently purchased firearm and where they're taking it.

First Look: Shell Tech Ammo Dog Bowl

The materials used in your dog’s bowl matter for all the same reasons the materials in your own water bottle matter. That's why this dog bowl from Shell Tech Ammo is worth looking at.

Pony Power: Colt Launches Optics Division with VMR Riflescopes

Colt Optics grew out of a market where military, law enforcement and civilian customers increasingly expect a firearms manufacturer to offer a complete package that goes beyond just the firearm

The Mysterious Mondragón: Mexico's Unique Self-Loading Military Rifle

Flawed in many ways, the Model 1908 Mondragón offered a preview of infantry rifles to come. And the circumstances of the Mondragón’s birth showed that not all firearm innovation comes from the hallowed halls of Springfield, Colt, Mauser or Enfield. 

Meet an Australian Visiting America to Warn Us

Australian political commentator Topher Field has come to America on its 250th birthday to speak and meet people and to bring the message that Australia’s gun confiscation should not be used as a template for the United States.

NRA-ILA’s John Commerford on What’s to Come for America’s Rifle

When the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear two cases—Grant v. Higgins and Viramontes v. Cook County, Illinois—that challenge bans on popular semi-automatic rifles in its next term, fear and trepidation ran like tremors through the public statements of anti-gun groups and the politicians they support.

Interests



Get the best of American Rifleman delivered to your inbox.