According to Speer Manual No. 14, “The .380 Auto was introduced to U.S. shooters in 1908 when Colt chambered it in the Pocket Automatic, a compact and well-built pistol designed by John Browning,” (p. 845). It’s also referred to as the .380 ACP, 9 mm Browning Short, and 9 mm Kurz, among other names, and it has a SAAMI-specified maximum average pressure (MAP) of 21,500 p.s.i. Since its introduction, the cartridge (and such chambered handguns) has experienced periodic increases in popularity, with today’s spike likely being the most notable. Of the self-defense chamberings, the .380 Auto is among the most contentious; some perceive it as marginal, at best, for personal protection, while others recognize-and accept-the tradeoff in ballistics for the ease-of-carry that pistols in this chambering offer. Further “muddying the waters” in the love-or-hate .380 debate are the latest generation of premium self-defense loads for the cartridge, as well as the newest “pocket pistols" chambered in 9 mm Luger. So, here’s your chance to express your views about the .380 Auto. Is there a necessity for it? Why or why not?
Justification for Existence: The .380 Auto
In 2019, Taurus Int’l made the business decision to set aside the company’s more unusual and exotic offerings. Instead, the team focused its efforts on improving product quality and manufacturing consistency while continuing to offer reliable handgun options that met its customers’ needs at affordable prices.
Since its introduction a decade ago, the Ruger American rifle line has grown both in popularity as well as the number of models available.
Since 2009, the SIG Sauer P238 has become a popular micro-compact, 1911-based .380 ACP chambered handgun for the concealed carry market.