Barnes Buster Bullets

by
posted on April 22, 2011
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
2011422122345-w7571tar-2002_f.jpg

Barnes Bullets is now most often associated with lead-free projectiles; however, the company’s founder, Fred Barnes, built the company’s good reputation with the development of his lead-core bullets. Manufactured via pressure-forming a copper jacket around a lead core, these bullets, aptly dubbed “Original,” are still made today, though in small numbers. With the Buster-series bullets, Barnes returns to its roots.

Barnes has manufactured pistol bullets since 1996, when it first introduced the X Pistol Bullet (XPB). Like its rifle X-Bullet brethren, XPBs feature 99.95-percent-pure copper construction and are designed for penetration, reliable expansion and 100-percent weight retention. As a result of their all-copper construction, XPBs are considerably longer than lead-core bullets in the same caliber and weight. The additional length occupies usable propellant space, requiring Barnes to counterbalance this with a light-for-caliber bullet weights. This isn’t always desirable. Their greater expansion can reduce penetration.

Buster bullets feature a 0.049-inch-thick, 99.95-percent-pure copper jacket—like the Original—designed expressly to maintain integrity and minimize expansion for deep penetration. The lead-alloy core, similar in composition to hard-cast bullets, was selected to resist deformation through the forcing cone. According to Barnes, the use of lead—because of its density—was necessary to maintain proper overall lengths with heavy-for-caliber projectiles, all while keeping them affordable. The latter precluded the use of dense, lead-free materials such as tungsten. Only a small portion of lead is visible, due to the manufacturing process, and it’s located in a dimple in the bullet’s base and on the meplat. It allows less fouling than standard, hard-cast lead projectiles. Because Busters will be used in hard-recoiling handgun and rifle loads, and because migration is a risk, the bullets feature cannelures.

In addition to the use of Busters by handgun and lever-action shooters, the bullets, when teamed with plastic sabots of the proper size, could prove valuable to the muzzleloader hunter. Whenever deep penetration is paramount— such as when pursuing dangerous game—a non-expanding projectile is often necessary. In such cases the Buster should excel.

For testing, we chose an unconventional path. Rather than load the 325-grain, 0.451-inch-diameter samples in a suitable handgun cartridge, such as the .454 Casull or .460 S&W Mag., we headed to the range with a CVA Optima 209 Magnum topped with a Leupold VX-II 3-9X 40 mm riflescope. We had previously shot Cor-Bon .45-70 Gov’t ammunition loaded with 400-grain Buster bullets in a Thompson/Center Arms Encore at 100 yards, during which accuracy averaged around 1½ inches for three-shot strings, so the Buster’s accuracy potential was verified. Still, handloading would likely further improve group size.

For testing with the CVA, after determining a good load combination, we shot five consecutive, five-shot groups at 100 yards. The load consisted of the Buster teamed with a Precision Rifle MMP sabot atop two IMR White Hots ignited by a Fusion 209 In-line primer. Between shots the barrel was swabbed with one solvent-soaked patch, followed by two dry ones, and a primer was fired. The rifle shot the 325-grain Buster fairly well, averaging 2.47 inches for 25 shots. The load’s velocity averaged 1581 fps for five shots, and the standard deviation was 17.

Currently, Barnes Busters are available in .44-cal. (0.429 inches, 300-grain), .45-cal. (0.451 inches, 325-grain and 0.458 inches, 400-grain) and .50-cal. (0.500 inches, 400-grain) options. Prices are $48.99, $51.49, $59.49, and $59.49, respectively.

At a time when most companies are looking at non-lead options, Barnes created a bullet that meets the needs of shooters, regardless of its composition. That’s forward thinking, and it has resulted in an excellent product.

Latest

Beretta 1301 A300 Comparison 1
Beretta 1301 A300 Comparison 1

Beretta's 1301 Tactical vs. A300 Ultima Patrol Shotguns: Which Should You Choose?

Ever since Beretta launched the A300 Ultima Patrol shotgun in 2024 as a less-pricey alternative to the 1301 Tactical, shotgunners have debated whether the 1301 is worth the extra cost. Let's examine them both.

ZEV Technologies Escaping Washington State’s Hostile Political Climate

ZEV Technologies announced it is moving its headquarters and manufacturing operations out of Washington state to Utah’s Second Amendment-friendly business climate.

U.S. v. Hemani Arguments

On March 2, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in U.S. v. Hemani. The case involves a defendant who is fighting a federal indictment for possessing a firearm while being a marijuana user.

Will Canada Attempt a Door-to-Door Gun Confiscation?

Whether, after Oct. 30, 2026, the federal government in Canada will escalate to door-to-door confiscation or whether they will be forced in the courts and legislatures to confront the failure of a policy that trades liberty for an illusion of control remains to be seen.

Rifleman Review: Federal 7 mm Backcountry

Unlike other recent cartridge launches, the key to Federal Ammunition's 7 mm Backcountry wasn't just in the design of the cartridge but also the type of material used in its case construction.

Big Bite in a Small Package: The Henry Repeating Arms Bear's Leg

Henry Repeating Arms is stepping up its lever-action game with the addition of its Bear's Leg design, a tactical lever-action that provides power and versatility in a compact platform.

Interests



Get the best of American Rifleman delivered to your inbox.