Rifleman Q&A: Israel’s Convertible Jericho

by
posted on January 9, 2024
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
Jericho pistol

Q. As a young police officer in the late 1980s and into the 1990s, I saw firsthand the burgeoning mainstream transition by officers and agencies from revolvers to semi-automatic pistols. Suddenly, there was a slew of chambering choices for duty pistols, and there was buzz around a new pistol—the Jericho 941. It was produced in Israel for use globally as well as for the Israeli police and defense forces. It afforded a cartridge change, from 9 mm Luger to .41 Action Express. What happened to the Jericho and the .41 Action Express?


A. The Jericho pistol was introduced to the United States in 1990. It was developed by Israel Military Industries (IMI) and became Israel’s standard military pistol. Originally, its parts were sourced from Tanfoglio in Italy, which had been successful in creating a CZ 75 clone. The original U.S. importer was K.B.I. in Harrisburg, Pa., with the company marketing it as the Jericho. Later, it was imported by O.F. Mossberg, which named it the Uzi Eagle, then by Magnum Research as the Baby Eagle. Israel Military Industries is now Israel Weapon Industries (IWI) and is again offering the Jericho 941 in 9 mm Luger.

The .41 Action Express actually predates the Jericho by a few years, but the test bed had been a variation of the CZ 75. The objective of the chambering was to duplicate the performance of the .41 Magnum police load and offer the conversion of 9 mm pistols by simply changing the barrel. Jericho pistols were initially shipped to the United States with both 9 mm and .41 AE barrels, allowing the shooter the option of either cartridge.

Determining the reason for the .41 AE’s extinction is subjective, and there are a number of factors that came into play. First of all, the chambering was only available in an imported pistol, and the ammunition was available only from Samson, also in Israel. If American producers of firearms and ammo had bought-in, the results might have been different. Secondly, and perhaps of more significant consequence, was the introduction of the .40 S&W cartridge in domestic firearms. Performance was not significantly different between the two cartridges, and U.S. law enforcement bought the .40 S&W in huge numbers; basically any company that offered a 9 mm Luger was also offering a .40 S&W. In the end, the convertibility feature was more of a novelty than a serious consideration.

Latest

Resurgence Of 2
Resurgence Of 2

New Digital Surveillance Tools Threaten Gun Owner Privacy

Technology contained within new digital surveillance hardware recently introduced by defense contractor Leonardo could conceivably track who has recently purchased firearm and where they're taking it.

First Look: Shell Tech Ammo Dog Bowl

The materials used in your dog’s bowl matter for all the same reasons the materials in your own water bottle matter. That's why this dog bowl from Shell Tech Ammo is worth looking at.

Pony Power: Colt Launches Optics Division with VMR Riflescopes

Colt Optics grew out of a market where military, law enforcement and civilian customers increasingly expect a firearms manufacturer to offer a complete package that goes beyond just the firearm

The Mysterious Mondragón: Mexico's Unique Self-Loading Military Rifle

Flawed in many ways, the Model 1908 Mondragón offered a preview of infantry rifles to come. And the circumstances of the Mondragón’s birth showed that not all firearm innovation comes from the hallowed halls of Springfield, Colt, Mauser or Enfield. 

Meet an Australian Visiting America to Warn Us

Australian political commentator Topher Field has come to America on its 250th birthday to speak and meet people and to bring the message that Australia’s gun confiscation should not be used as a template for the United States.

NRA-ILA’s John Commerford on What’s to Come for America’s Rifle

When the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear two cases—Grant v. Higgins and Viramontes v. Cook County, Illinois—that challenge bans on popular semi-automatic rifles in its next term, fear and trepidation ran like tremors through the public statements of anti-gun groups and the politicians they support.

Interests



Get the best of American Rifleman delivered to your inbox.