Fear & Loading: Hawaii Court Upholds Open Carry

by
posted on July 25, 2018
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
opencarryholster.jpg

A decision by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals—based in San Francisco, Calif.—issued Tuesday determined open carry for self-defense is protected by the Second Amendment. “This is a critical issue for law-abiding gun owners who want to exercise their right to self-defense outside the home,” said Chris W. Cox, executive director, NRA-ILA. “The Second Amendment clearly protects the right to bear arms in public.”

The irony of the defense citing nearly 600-year-old British precedent didn’t escape Justice Diarmmuid F. O’Scannlain, either, who wrote, “… we respectfully decline the County’s and the State’s invitation to import English law wholesale into our Second Amendment jurisprudence.”

“The County and the State, apparently seeing little room to quarrel with American history, argue that the English right to carry weapons openly was limited for centuries by the 1328 Statute of Northampton, and that we should incorporate wholesale that understanding of English rights into our Constitution’s Second Amendment,” the 2-1 decision [PDF]states. “Exploring fourteenth century English law books (after a thorough dusting) reveals that the statute allowed no ordinary Englishman to ‘bring . . . force in affray of the peace, nor to go nor ride armed by night nor by day, in Fairs, Markets, nor in the presence of the Justices or other Ministers, nor in no part elsewhere.’”

The case stemmed from a challenge of Hawaii Revised Statute 134-9 by George K. Young Jr., who had multiple handgun permits denied by authorities because he didn’t qualify as an “exceptional case” for concealed carry and wasn’t working in the security industry. Firearm purchases in Hawaii require permits, and residents are only allowed to have guns at home, at work or during “sojourns.”   

“Thus, we hold that section 134-9’s limitation on the open carry of firearms to those ‘engaged in the protection of, life and property’ violates the core of the Second Amendment and is void,” wrote Justice O’Scannlain.  “… the County may not constitutionally enforce such a limitation on applicants for open carry licenses.”

Latest

NRA Supports Hunters For The Hungry Programs
NRA Supports Hunters For The Hungry Programs

NRA Supports Hunters For The Hungry Programs

In 2025, Hunters for the Hungry programs across the United States will have extra support from the National Rifle Association, thanks to NRA Foundation donors.

Preview: Hornady Security RAPiD Safe Night Guard

The latest security product to leverage the company’s RAPiD Safe touch-free radio-frequency identification (RFID) technology, Hornady Security’s Night Guard is a ruggedly built handgun safe sized perfectly...

Hecho en México: The Mendoza RM22 Rifles

Mendoza Firearms claims that its RM22 rimfire rifle is the first indigenously produced rifle to be exported to the United States.

Preview: MGE 1911 Grips

Mammoth Grip Exchange is a small startup company that specializes in crafting replacement stock sets for M1911-pattern pistols in a dizzying assortment of exotic materials...

Gun Of The Week: Mossberg 990 Aftershock

For this Gun Of The Week episode, American Rifleman staffers hit the range with the Mossberg 990 Aftershock, a non-NFA, shotshell-firing firearm that provides plenty of power in a compact package.

The Armed Citizen® Nov. 14, 2025

Read today's "The Armed Citizen" entry for real stories of law-abiding citizens, past and present, who used their firearms to save lives.

Interests



Get the best of American Rifleman delivered to your inbox.