Experts in the Field
FacebookTwitter
YouTubeRSS Feed
/Webcontent/blog_banner_imgs/36.jpg

Blog Home / « Prev / Ruger LCR .22 LR / Next » / RSS Feed

Ruger LCR .22 LR

Ruger LCR .22 LR

12/16/2011

The “From The Editor” I wrote for the February issue (if you missed it don’t worry; it won’t be in your mailbox until mid-January) was based on two trends I have seen developing for 2012: Manufacturing guns to be affordable and the introduction of a host of new .22 Long Rifle rifles and handguns that are actually affordable to shoot.

Two weeks ago I was fortunate enough to travel to Sturm, Ruger & Co. in Newport, N.H., to see the changes at the plant since my last visit in the 1990s, and to have a sneak peak at some of the projects the dedicated and bright engineers in Newport and Prescott, Ariz., have been working on. One of the guns was a Ruger Lightweight Carry Revolver, which was the first polymer-framed production wheelgun, but this version was chambered in .22 Long Rifle. Ruger’s Mark Gurney has given us the go ahead to talk about the gun.

The LCR was by designed by Ruger’s Joseph Zajk for mass production and light weight. It combines a polymer lower frame with a steel cylinder and crane assembly and an aluminum upper frame with a steel barrel liner. Making traditional revolvers that are timed properly is actually a form of arcane science. If you have ever watched fitters at a traditional revolver plant, you will appreciate that it takes the attention of a skilled craftsman to make one work properly.

Ruger put a lot of time and engineering effort into making the LCR suitable for mass production, as well as improving the double-action-only trigger pull by making several of the action’s engagement surfaces round-on-round contact points to allow for a smooth trigger pull. The other thing about the LCR is you can stack, or stage, the trigger repeatably. With practice, you can get a precise shot off almost as if it were a single-action. That is quite a trick with a rimfire version of the LCR in .22, which requires more firing pin energy. This means you must have either a heavier hammer or stiffer springs than a center-fire, but my preliminary shooting and handling of the new LCR indicate that Ruger pulled it off admirably.

Ruger LCR .22

The LCR .22 makes perfect sense for those who own and carry a .357 Mag. or .38 Spl. LCR as a training gun, or even a trail gun. It works just the same, save for the geometry of the eight-shot cylinder. And let’s face it, shooting .22s is fun. One can develop confidence in his or her choice for personal defense while shooting affordable .22 LR. Another reason why the .22 LCR makes sense is that some folks are exceedingly recoil shy, and have issues comfortably shooting more gun than a .22—especially in a lightweight gun. Also, some shooters have a hard time racking the slide of a semi-automatic pistol, which is not an issue with the LCR. While no self-respecting self defense “expert” would recommend a .22 for personal protection and expect to keep their gun writer's union card, a .22 you have with you (especially with an eight-shot cylinder capacity) that you can comfortably shoot and hit consistently with is better than no gun at all or one that you cannot shoot comfortably and accurately, and certainly better than a sharp stick. Do people use .22s for personal protection against the counsel of gunwriters? Well North American Arms sells a lot of Mini revolvers and Bond Arms sells plenty of .22 derringers to someone. I guess I need to turn in my gun writer union card now.

The new gun weighs less than 15 ounces unloaded and it has a six-groove 1:16-inch right hand twist barrel measuring 1 7/8-inches long. The suggested retail price is $525. If I can get it on the range with a video camera soon, I’ll show how it works and how it shoots. No doubt it will be fun and affordable.

LCR .22 Chamber

  • Comment
  • Send to Friend
  • Share This
  • Kat

    3/30/2012 5:49:56 AM

    I have RA and have been having trouble finding something I can handle as far as recoil and trigger pull go... I bought this gun because it was perfect to both and very concealable. I LOVE IT!

  • Frog Prince

    2/3/2012 9:06:19 PM

    I love my LCR in .38 but am not going to pay $525 for a .22. Maybe $250.

  • Vinny

    2/1/2012 11:56:33 PM

    I had the S&W 351. Sold it as the trigger pull was very heavy. My wife could not pull the trigger and I did not want to put in the time to shoot a .22 that should be easy to shoot without many hours of practice by someone who has been shooting for over 40 years all in all the popular and some unpopular calibers. :) I love the LCR trigger although all my snubbies are S&W.

  • TBurke

    1/28/2012 11:59:37 PM

    $525?!?!?! As good as the Rugers are, not paying that for a .22, maybe $250, $300 tops.

  • Bob R.

    1/11/2012 9:42:46 PM

    Well, got my two today. A .38 Spec. and the new LCR 22. Shot them both. Nice triggers. Put the first 5 .38's into a 3" circle at 10 yds., and ditto for the first eight with the .22. They're keepers!

  • frank p

    1/8/2012 7:15:48 AM

    I have S&W 8 shot. 22 weighs 10.6 Oz... Has external hammer and is single or double action..ss and aluminum...corosion resistant. Msrp higher then Ruger but picks up less weight and single action asset. Live in NC mountains and keep it loaded and handy for snake shot...

  • Nels

    1/3/2012 2:06:18 PM

    Looks interesting. But that MSRP is crazy. Maybe it's a misprint. No way a point-n-shoot .22 lacking real sights should cost more than $200. Seriously, you can get a target-grade .22 from at least two major manufacturers, with adjustable sights, for $220 at any major sporting goods store. Yes, this must be a misprint. Maybe the MSRP was supposed to be $199.

  • Dan

    12/27/2011 1:56:18 PM

    Jut an FYI, I just picked one of these up at my local shop (they had one in stock, I had cash in my pocket, so I said why not) and it was $399+tax. Street price seems to be well below MSRP.

  • Derek

    12/26/2011 2:24:00 AM

    I would love to have one as a "fun gun" or for the wife to learn on, but yeah... pricey. I will be curious to see if there are any keyholing issues, as other .22's I've fired out of such a short barrel have suffered from it.

  • Nathan

    12/25/2011 11:38:12 AM

    Sounds about perfect for my daughter depending on trigger pull. She has RA and does not tolerate heavy recoil well. Fits Jeff Cooper gunfight rule.

  • David Madden

    12/23/2011 8:52:47 AM

    With so many wonderful used guns available why in the world are they charging so much? I will definitely not waste my money here.

  • Brian

    12/21/2011 10:25:07 PM

    An 8 shot .22 pistol at $500 plus is 'affordable'? Maybe at $250.

  • Tigerbeetle

    12/20/2011 10:10:29 AM

    The price is a killer. 'nuff said.

  • oogie

    12/19/2011 10:38:31 PM

    $525. is a little expensive for a .22 fun gun.

  • Bill Mansfield

    12/19/2011 9:29:10 PM

    I like the gun. I think it's briliant. Half the guns I own are all Ruger. However, $525 for a simple .22 revolver? I don't think so. Thanks anyway.