Handguns > Semi-Auto

Two Guns in One? FN's FNS

The FNS will hit the mark with value-conscious shooters who demand a quality service pistol.

2/21/2013

For more than a century, the Belgian firm of Fabrique Nationale de Armes de Guerre (FN) has been an iconic institution in the world of armsmaking. In the early days, some of those guns came from the genius of American designer John Browning, who made frequent Atlantic crossings to conduct his European business. Browning forever owns the loyalty of America for his many military models, some of which are still in active service with U.S. forces. As a matter of fact, some U.S. service firearms come from an FN facility in South Carolina. The association of FN and the American market—military, police and sporting—remains strong. The pistol at hand is a perfect example of FN’s willingness to build guns that are specifically designed for American use. Made in the United States by an FN subsidiary called FNH USA, the pistol is known as the FNS.

It is a gun that reflects American preferences in full-size service pistols, appropriate for both police holster carry and civilian personal defense. The FNS is the latest in a modern series of FN pistols designed to compete with other major brands. After earlier unsuccessful efforts to modernize the aging classic Hi-Power and several unsuccessful polymer guns, FNH came out with a series of pistols in the popular American chamberings. Called the FNP series, these pistols lasted several years until updated into the current hammer-fired FNX line. Interestingly enough, the FNPs included a .357 SIG version, but the FNX line does not. At this point, the striker-fired FNS lineup is either 9 mm Luger or .40 S&W, but a .45 ACP is on the way. The relative size of the various cartridges means that one frame will do for 9 mm/.40 S&W, but a slightly larger one will be required to build a .45 ACP gun.

This is a preview of a completely new version of the FNS pistol, which is so new that a final suggested retail price was not available at press time—the price shown in the accompanying table is an estimate from FN. It is called the Combo Kit and our sample 9 mm Luger Combo Kit gun came in an elaborate black nylon case with designated pockets for the two extra magazines, lock, manual, etc. along with a pocket that holds a complete top half in .40 S&W. The receiver is the same for both chamberings, so you can shoot either of the popular pistol chamberings in the same gun. Just swap the uppers. You will need a different magazine, but two clearly marked .40 S&W magazines are included. In a sense, this FNS is a gun-and-a-half if you count the parts, but it is in effect two pistols—a 9 mm Luger with three magazines and a .40 S&W with two.

The implications of this approach are huge. Shooters who want to shoot a lot in practice can buy the less-expensive bulk 9 mm, then change back to .40 S&W when there’s a need for better terminal effect. A quick telephone survey of local gun shops indicated the savings in my area would run around 25 to 35 percent. You could amortize the additional top half pretty quickly at that rate. The second so-called “top half” consists of a complete slide, barrel and recoil spring with guide. The spring is calibrated for the barrel and slide—do not mix them up. Swapping calibers takes only seconds, and it can be done in less time than it takes to describe it. Unload the pistol, lock the slide to the rear and pivot the takedown lever down 90 degrees. Depress the slide lock and ease the slide assembly off the receiver. Replace the slide with the alternate one, rack it to the rear, and lock it in place. Pivot the takedown lever up 90 degrees, and you’re ready to go in another caliber.

Whether it’s a 9 mm Luger upper installed on your gun or the .40 S&W, the gun behaves the same. The operating controls are on the receiver and are ambidextrous. Up-to-safe, down-to-fire thumb safeties are at the top rear edges of the receiver and a slide lock lever is about an inch forward of that. Magazine release buttons are near the lower rear corner of the trigger guard. Push in and the magazine will drop free of the pistol.

Speaking of magazines, let’s look at what comes in the kit. There are three 9 mm magazines, which have impressed ridges on the flat sides. They accept 17 rounds for an on-board availability of 18 when there’s one in the chamber. In the case of the two .40 S&W magazines, it’s 14 rounds (plus one), and the magazine bodies do not have the ridges. Magazines of either caliber are an easy fit in the receiver, change quickly and even have an integral stop for the over-eager shooter who slams his magazines into place with undue vigor.

The pistol is a duty-size, polymer-and-steel, recoil-operated, semi-automatic pistol that weighs 25.2 ounces with the 9 mm upper and 27.5 ounces when the .40 S&W slide and barrel are in place. It measures 7.25 x 5.5 x 1.35 inches with either upper. I believe the slight weight increase with the .40 S&W upper is probably because that fast-opening, sometimes problematic cartridge needs a little more mass in the recoiling parts.

And that brings us to the major reason why the FNS is different from earlier FNP and current FNX pistols. Those earlier FNs use double-action/single-action triggers. Most competing makers offer guns with double-action-only trigger (DAO) systems, a trend that began with Glock in the mid 1980s. Many shooters have come to believe that this system is superior due to the short, smooth trigger pull on every shot. Double-action-only guns invariably use a spring-loaded striker (rather than a pivoting hammer) and partially pre-cock the striker when the slide recoils. This is exactly why FN’s engineers went with the striker-fired system on the FNS. In today’s market, the double-action-only FNS pistol is probably a more competitive pistol than the FNX with its double-action/single-action trigger system.

There are other features that are sure to be popular with the avid handgunner. The FNS’ sights are big and easy to see; they even have those highly desirable tritium inserts, one on the front and two on the rear. It is the rear sight notch that is so different. It is quite large and has typical parallel sides. But at the bottom end of the notch, the contour is a deep “V.” You sure can see those sights easily. The molded polymer receiver has a built-in accessory rail for lights or lasers on the dust cover. There are several panels of dots or ridges that serve to anchor the pistol in the shooter’s grasp. Even the company logo (an old-fashioned intertwined “FN”) on both sides of the butt is a part of the gripping surface. Finally, the kit has an extra interchangeable backstrap that permits tailoring of the butt to a greater variety of hands.

At the range, we fired several different commercial loads through the gun with each upper in place. The data shows the pistol to be a pretty good shooter, with a bit of an edge going to the gun in its mid-bore configuration—.40 S&W. This is a little surprising, because the .40 S&W is not often seen as a particularly nail-driving cartridge. In the absence of proper Ransom Rest inserts, I was forced to fire from a benched rest and that never produces really great results. Also, the DAO trigger was difficult to manage for this type of shooting. While the manual says the trigger pull weighs from 5.5 to 7.7 pounds, I would guess this one was at the high end of the range.

Functioning was absolutely 100 percent, with nary a stutter or glitch in the performance of either caliber. The trigger is different, but experienced shooters will quickly pick up on how to reset the trigger after an initial shot. That means pulling all the way through the DAO arc, holding the trigger back and then slowly allowing it go forward. A slight click means the trigger linkage inside the gun is re-set and ready to fire again. Buyers are encouraged to develop skill in doing this—it is the key to getting the most from the unique FNS “two-guns-in-one” pistol from FNH USA. This is a fine new entry from a legendary gunmaker, and I believe it will hit the mark with value-conscious shooters who demand a quality service pistol.

1   2    NEXT >>

Share |

Comments

ADD YOUR COMMENT

Enter your comments below, they will appear within 24 hours


Your Name


Your Email


Your Comment

9 Responses to Two Guns in One? FN's FNS

Taylor wrote:
October 26, 2013

When was the FNX .40 originally released to the public?

Raven wrote:
March 12, 2013

Just curious why the price of a 'gun and a half' would be more than the price of both guns combined... Right now you can buy the FNS9 or FNS40 for around $600, thus giving you two guns for less than the price of one and a half......

Steven Gaines wrote:
March 06, 2013

I purchased a FNP-45 Tactical in March 2012. I dumped it in January 2013 and cannot recommend FN Pistols to anyone. FN may tease you with all their products but the company DOES NOT SUPPORT any of it's pistols after the sale. I tried to purchase extra magazines for mine from the time I purchased it until I dumped it. I am a LE officer and need to rotate magazines monthly. I attempted to contact FN numerous times to find out why there was no support and NEVER got a reply. The gun was good, the support was non-existent. I have owned almost every brand of firearm and have never had a company with service and support this poor. Not even the aftermarket will support FN pistols. I will not ever purchase a FN and can not recommend them to anyone. RUN away. RUN away now. RUN fast. This is my opinion and you can take my experience for what it is worth but so many others I spoke to said the same things.

Tim Mroczek wrote:
March 04, 2013

FNH got it right! I've done the same thing with a Brand X pistol by getting a second barrel. It will run 357 SIG and 40 S&W. Not much of a change in ballistics but it helps when you can't find ammo for one or the other.

Milt Cia'o wrote:
February 27, 2013

Wonder what my Browning 1922FN is worth.. I can change from 9mm (380ACP) to 7mm (32 ACP)in 25 seconds and use the same magazines for both calibers.

Craig wrote:
February 26, 2013

Good article, would be interested in try the combo kit out. I'm actually going to purchase the FNS 9 this Friday 3/1

steve wrote:
February 26, 2013

part of a gun sitting in a draw seems like a waste. two guns each ready and capable doing of the job sounds better to me.

Jack wrote:
February 26, 2013

$1,400 ? value conscious ?

Smitty wrote:
February 25, 2013

I think that FN would sell more than if it was sold it as 9mm/.40 with a .22lr upper.