Handguns > Revolver

The Taurus Judge vs. The Magnum Research BFR

How do these two .410 handguns stack up for self-defense?

12/7/2010

Handguns chambered to fire the .410 shotshell provide shooters with a unique set of advantages and challenges. These handguns offer the flexibility of firing a variety of projectiles such as .45-caliber bullets, slugs, birdshot, buckshot and .410 specialty rounds. However, being able to fire multiple projectiles is a mixed blessing. The ability to fire .410 shells comes at the sacrifice of long-range accuracy. Since many shooters have chosen to purchase .410 handguns for recreation and self-defense, AmericanRifleman.org decided to test two of the best-known revolvers on the market—the Judge and the Hammer—to see how they compare.

The Taurus Judge
Handguns chambered to fire .410 shells were available before the Judge arrived on the scene, but none of them were as commercially successful. The Judge seems to have just the right balance of price, form and features to inspire the handgun buying public. Unlike some of its unsuccessful predecessors, such as the chunky Thunder 5, the Judge follows the same clean, lean design that shooters prefer in double-action revolvers. Taurus also had the foresight to offer its revolvers in a variety of finishes and barrel lengths. In fact, the success of the Judge has inspired ammunition manufacturers to design .410 shells specifically for handguns.

The stainless steel model I tested came with a 6.5-inch barrel, a fiber-optic front sight, the recoil-absorbing Ribber Grip, and weighed in at 32 ounces. The double-action trigger pull was smooth and consistent, while the single-action trigger was crisp. Though the revolver has a fixed rear-notch sight, the bright fiber-optic front sight made it easy to stay on target. The revolver exhibited a level of felt recoil that should be expected in a lightweight big-bore handgun, but it was comfortable to shoot and easy to control. Taurus offers this revolver in a wide variety of configurations, including models with factory barrel porting and light-weight alloys.

The Magnum Research BFR
The BFR (Biggest Finest Revolver) is the strongest .45 Colt/.410 revolver currently available on the market. Built using the same materials and processes as BFRs chambered in much more potent rounds, such as the .500 S&W Magnum and .450 Marlin, this revolver can easily digest any factory .45 Colt ammunition you would care to feed it. This includes “+P” and "+P+" rated ammunition like CORBON's Hunter series and Buffalo Bore's Heavy .45 Colt +P loadings. So, with three ammunition types on hand, the revolver can be loaded for short-range snake, dangerous animal and self-defense, all at the same time.

The BFR is a stainless-steel single-action revolver with a 5.5-inch barrel, rubber grips, adjustable target sights, weighing in at 4.3 pounds. Though nicknamed “The Hammer,” this revolver is anything but when it comes to felt recoil. The combination of the extra weight and its single-action design make this BFR quite comfortable to shoot, even with heavy .45 Colt loads. The single-action trigger broke at just over 3 pounds, with no creep.

Opening the loading gate allows the cylinder to spin freely to either the right or the left. This is helpful when setting a specific round to fire first. The overall fit and finish of this revolver clearly demonstrates the dedication of Magnum Research to building high-quality revolvers. They also offer customers their Precision Shop, which provides a variety of custom options.

.410 Tests
Testing the performance of .410 shotshells from handguns has proved to be problematic in the past. The traditional tests for handgun performance focus on the behavior of single projectiles rather than shot pellets. Averaging the size of five, 5-shot groups is not possible since several projectiles on different trajectories are launched with each pull of the trigger. Short-range, rapid-fire drills will, as most .410 handgun owners already know, produce copious amounts of confetti, but not a readable target.

To address this problem, I developed a performance test that blended traditional handgun target tests with shotgun pattern tests. The goal was to use handgun targets to track how quickly the shot pellets are spreading. Instead of firing several shells into a single target, the test involved firing single shells into several targets, with each target set at a greater distance from the muzzle. For this article, targets were shotat 6, 10, 15, and 20 foot intervals with two of the most popular .410 defensive loads on the market—Federal’s .410 Handgun 4-Pellet 000 Buckshot and Winchester’s PDX-1.

Using the following table, you can see how each shell performed from both revolvers. Because the PDX-1 has two kinds of payload, their spread rates are tracked separately. The revolvers produced tight, useful groups with both .410 defense loads.

 

.45 Colt Tests
I used the standard average of five, 5-shot groups fired from 25 yards to test for accuracy in these revolvers, using Winchester 185-grain Silver Tip Hollow Points. While newer bullet designs have arrived on the market, the Silver Tip remains a popular choice for self-defense. I fired all shots from a benchrest position, using the single-action trigger for the Taurus Judge.

Both revolvers shot close to the point-of-aim at 15 yards. However, both also showed a tendency to shoot high at the 25-yard mark. Aiming about 3 inches below the bullseye seemed to solve this problem, but did not resolve the relatively large groups the revolvers produced. The BFR Hammer averaged 5.25-inch groups, with the best group being 3.5 inches. The Taurus Judge produced an average group size of 5.3 inches, also with a best group of 3.5 inches. Critics of the Judge have blamed this less-than-predictable level of accuracy with .45 Colt loads on some unidentified lack of quality control. However, since I've had the opportunity to test a variety of .45 Colt/.410 handguns, and the problem occurs across different brands, I think there is a more likely explanation.

If you measure the cylinder of a dedicated .45 Colt revolver, such as a Ruger Blackhawk, you'll find the distance from the .45 Colt cartridge case opening to the cylinder gap is relatively short. With the Blackhawk, it’s about 7/16 of an inch. In order to build a revolver cylinder capable of accommodating both .45 Colt rounds and the much longer .410 shotshell, the distance the .45 Colt bullet travels in the unrifled cylinder is significantly increased.

Instead of traveling just 7/16 of an inch, the bullet now has to travel anywhere from 1-5/16 to 1-3/4 inches before it reaches the cylinder gap. This allows plenty of room for a bullet to wander or start to wobble. Does this make .45 Colt/.410 revolvers bad guns? No more so than a S&W J-frame is a bad gun because it can’t shoot accurately out to a thousand yards, or a Barrett .50 BMG rifle is a bad gun because it won’t fit neatly into a handbag. It’s a matter of compromise. Shooters gain the flexibility of .410 shotshells at the sacrifice of long-distance accuracy with .45 Colt rounds.

The BFR offers a heavy duty, single-action design that is comfortable to shoot and I’m confident that it will still be working smoothly when I give it to my grandkids, which is a long way down the road. The Judge offers the light weight and quick handling that makes compact double-action revolvers so handy to have around. In other words, it’s the usual apples and oranges debate that crops up in any single-action vs. double-action revolver comparison.

1   2    NEXT >>

Share |

Comments

ADD YOUR COMMENT

Enter your comments below, they will appear within 24 hours


Your Name


Your Email


Your Comment

12 Responses to The Taurus Judge vs. The Magnum Research BFR

Don Gist wrote:
January 01, 2013

Great writing. Do everyone a favor and test the Winchester PDX-1 3" in the new Taurus .410 Judge with the 6 1/2" barrel. There are 4 discs and 16 basically useless BB's. At 25-30-35' I average 4 discs - 90% (9 of 10) in a 10x10" target. At 40' just 80%(8 of 10.) 100% (10 of 10) in the same 10" target. With the 5 shot 6 1/2" Judge and 2 1/2" shotshells: 100% at 15-20-25' for the 3 discs in the 10x10" target. Being 82 years and began 7/2010 to shoot,trigger is too stiff for previously injured right hand/fingers so I cock the hammer. I do not intend firing but once for defense per bad guy. I practice cocking fast. Previously 2 attempted breakins. After 500+ shots in 2 1/2 years, plus 3 neighbors now shooting big guns every weekend here in the country, all theft of livestock, & eqt. has ceased. We each have safe shooting ranges on site. At least 1/4 mile distance for shot sound report. The Judges are NOT difficult to master with constant practice. Taurus has my vote for self defense. PS I was a USAF fighter pilot so I knew zip re handguns,but recommend the Judge's most highly for serious personal protection with no problems. Again, thanx for the great writing. A real service & should be more widely made available as my friends are amazed at all this. I sincerely hope this is useful. Most Sincerely, Don Gist

GGuns wrote:
October 06, 2012

Feedbag is right about .410 slugs fired out of a .45. Its the bore diameter that is the problem. While a rifled slug fired from the proper barrel has more velocity, one fired from the judge is mostly hot air. Lead /410 slugs measure anywhere from .390 to .412 while the pistol bore is .451. See the problem? The expanding gases blow around the projectile muting velocity and performance. Using .410 shot shells and 45 colt slugs is best with these pistols.

feedbag wrote:
June 25, 2012

Slugs are a poor choice...If 1 projectile will solve your problem, the 45 has a longer range for remaining accurate.

Parsonpill wrote:
March 30, 2011

Was able to fire the 6" barrel Judge at 21' with #7 or #8 shot and it covered the standard target. Wonder what a 3" barrel would do ?

Joel wrote:
January 19, 2011

Bobho: I think this will answer your question of what defense disks are. http://www.basspro.com/Winchester-reg-Supreme-Elite-reg-PDX1-410-Buckshot/product/10207287/-1693706 They seem a little odd to me but I guess they work.

Tojo wrote:
January 07, 2011

I bought a Judge (Public Defender) for one reason, personal protection. I got a 2" barrel so it WOULD scatter. I don't want a tite group... I won't be shooting in any contest with it... When an intruder comes at 3 in morning when I am sound asleep I want to be able to hit him... That's why the Judge is selling so well, people want a weapon they can rely on to be quick and efficent... As far as shotshells, as close as I will be if used, it's not going to make a lot of difference what size shot or how hot it's loaded...

BoBBy-B wrote:
December 18, 2010

Riz And Skoonz, Are asking what I want to Know. When will you do those test?

Shuck wrote:
December 15, 2010

Less is More. Wider spread is more likely Kill or Stop with the .410 handgun at close range. I am talking decision distance. Proximity to NMT 30 foot. The best reason to choose a .410 handgun is loss of fine motor skills at short range, one shot or die,combat. A perfect gunner under stress in close combat would not care to shoot a .410. Any old .22 placed perfectly will deliver one shot kill or stop..... again... that is placed perfectly. I want wide group with the .410 handgun. The wider the better at short distance. Give me a higher powder charge with about 4-8 more pellets (higher velocity, smaller projectile, less accuracy more scatter) for .410 handgun short range handgun load. I will Kill or Stop with poor motor skills using the .410 I don't care about the higher powder charge, more projectiles and the higher shock to my wrist. I am not concerned about shooting it at the range for accuracy. I will shoot it a few times to familiarize myself, then put it in my drawer. I will only need to use it once.

Bobho wrote:
December 14, 2010

What are "defense disks" referred to in the chart shown? I am not familiar with the term.

Gnfixer wrote:
December 14, 2010

Did you shoot the BFR with the choke in or out? I've found with the choke in the shot patterns are consistant and tight.

Riz wrote:
December 13, 2010

I agree completely! You never see these tested with slugs, which would seem to me to be better than a .45 colt round for closer ranges. Also, I know several people who carry these to dispatch snakes while hunting and they use fine shot. It would be great to see both tested.

Skoonz wrote:
December 07, 2010

It wouold have been interesting to see results with 410 slugs and #7 or #8 shot. Part of the utility of shotshells is shooting something that will not endanger a neighbor if you happen to miss.