Handguns > Semi-Auto

STI Total Eclipse

Modularity, additional ammunition and manageable recoil make the STI Total Eclipse a top contender in the burgeoning carry-gun market.

1/25/2011

When the first STI 2011 pistols hit dealer shelves in 1994, it was unique in being the only high-capacity M1911 design featuring a modular two-piece bottom end consisting of a steel sub-frame and a detachable polymer grip. The company’s newest model, the Total Eclipse, was introduced in January 2010. The Total Eclipse offers the benefits of STI’s modular design in a model featuring a 3-inch barrel, a 0.9-inch-shorter grip, and a high-capacity magazine holding 13 rounds of 9 mm Luger, 11 rounds of .40 S&W, or nine rounds of .45 ACP.

The Total Eclipse is built on the company’s 2011 platform, which features a shortened frame made of 4140 steel hardened to 30 Rc. This precision-machined component contains the frame rails, fire-control mechanism, thumb and grip safeties and slide stop, and it serves as the bed for the barrel. The trigger pull is factory-set for a nominal weight of 4 pounds, 8 ounces, to 5 pounds, 8 ounces. Custom frame touches include an oversize-angled STI thumb safety, a bobbed STI high-grip beavertail safety with a palm pad, and an extended combat ejector.

The black grip is made of a proprietary glass-filled polymer. Molded-in checkered side panels and 20-l.p.i. checkering on the frontstrap and flat polymer mainspring housing, and 25 l.p.i. checkering on the squared-off trigger guard, afford a no-slip grip. The one-piece construction of the grip allows a relatively thin front strap and sidewalls, resulting in a grip width of 1.28 inches, a fore-and-aft measurement of 2.10 inches and a circumference of 5.69 inches. These figures compare well with the grip width typical of a single-stack M1911. Because of the double-stack magazine, however, the STI grip has a blockier shape.

The slide is CNC-machined of 4140 steel, heat-treated to approximately 40 Rc. It features angled rear slide serrations and a lowered and fluted ejection port. The slide lacks a passive firing pin block.

Both the slide and steel frame are thoroughly dehorned, and all metal components have a matte-black KG finish.

The pistol’s stainless steel STI barrel features an integral Wilson/Nowlin-type feed ramp and a flared muzzle. Compression of its double-spring recoil system is controlled by a two-piece, full-length guide rod.

Sights consist of a ramped front post, and a Heinie fixed carry rear with Trijicon self-luminous inserts, arranged in a two-dot figure-eight pattern. An integral sight channel in the top of the slide allows lower sight mounting.

Its double-stack magazine has a steel body, a polymer follower, and a removable black polymer floorplate. The magazine catch is steel.

We tested a new STI Total Eclipse in .40 S&W using defensive loads from Hornady, Remington and Winchester, fired off sandbags at 25 yards. We initially experienced occasional feeding jams, attributable in our judgment to the tight fitting of the gun. After a 75-round break-in period, however, reliability became excellent. Ejection was strong, with cases thrown 7 to 10 feet to the rear. All of the pistol’s controls and safeties worked properly.

The best-performing Hornady XTP load grouped into less than 3 inches. Recoil was strong but not intolerable, thanks to the dual-spring recoil system and the gun’s polymer grip. The grip frame was noticeably shorter than that of a standard Government Model or STI pistol, but our test shooter’s average-size hands fit around the grip comfortably without overhanging at the bottom. The light weight of the polymer grip frame made the gun feel slightly top-heavy, especially as the magazine emptied.

The molded checkering on the sides and front of the grip assisted in maintaining a consistent hold, and the gun was reasonably controllable even when shooting rapid pairs. Viewed through the rear notch, the front post allowed sufficient daylight around its sides for fast sight alignment.

One of the benefits of the STI design is its modularity, which allows the grip portion of the Total Eclipse to be changed out for any other STI grip.

The STI Total Eclipse is neither larger nor heavier than a Colt Lightweight Officer’s ACP, but it holds roughly 50 percent more ammunition. The pistol’s many “factory custom” modifications make any additional gunsmithing enhancements superfluous. These factors should make the pistol a top contender in the burgeoning carry-gun market.

Manufacturer: STI Int’l; (512) 819-0656; www.stiguns.com
Caliber: 9 mm Luger, .40 S&W (tested), .45 ACP
Action Type: recoil-operated, single-action semi-automatic pistol
Frame: modular, machined 4140 steel bar stock
Barrel: 416 stainless steel, 3"
Rifling: four grooves, 1:16" LH twist
Magazine: steel detachable box, 11-round capacity (.40 S&W)
Sights: ramped front post, rear fixed, drift-adjustable for windage, Trijicon night sights in a two-dot, figure-eight configuration
Trigger Pull: single-action, 5 lbs, 8 ozs.
Stocks: modular, detachable, glass-filled polymer
Overall Length: 6.85"
Width: 1.40"
Height: 4.98"
Weight: 25.8 ozs.
Accessories: hard plastic case, owner’s manual
Options: ambidextrous thumb safety
Suggested Retail Price: $1,825

Share |

Comments

ADD YOUR COMMENT

Enter your comments below, they will appear within 24 hours


Your Name


Your Email


Your Comment

10 Responses to STI Total Eclipse

Capt. Bob wrote:
December 01, 2012

My STI Tactical is the most accurate pistol I own. I own the Sprng. EMP, Sig Pro 2022, 229, & 250 and HK USP compact. They can't touch the STI. You get what you pay for.

Billy wrote:
February 14, 2011

I would NOT own one of these guns. There is all kinds of problems with these guns from magazine problems, to slide cracking where the front sight is dovetailed in. They have cheap taurus/armscore parts in them. If you think you are getting american made think again. I'll stick with my Kimber atleast I know it functions. I would bet my life on my Kimber!!

Vandella X wrote:
February 14, 2011

In my opinion, this is way too much for a gun with pretty standard options. It looks nice but sounds as though it may not perform as an 1800.00 gun should.. The sights are nice but I think I will stick with my Glock model 19. :)

HAMBONE wrote:
February 14, 2011

Keep an eye open at your local gun-show. Some one with more money than knowledge is bound to show up with one after realizing they don't like it. Happens with every new pistola.

Dan wrote:
February 10, 2011

Get yourself a Ruger for about one fourth of the price. They aren't called bricks with a trigger for nothing. Paying $1,825.00 for a pistol is just plain stupid.

Mike wrote:
February 10, 2011

I can buy two to four goods hand guns for the price of one of these. They will all do the same shoot. No way would I pay this kind of money.

Rick wrote:
February 09, 2011

$1,825.00????!!!! Does this come with a guy who shoots it for ya'? Think I'll stick with my Sig.

Mark wrote:
February 01, 2011

This is a no-brainer. There are numerous pistols that perform very well, reliably, and cost much less -- S$W, Sig., Walther, CZ, FNX-9, etc.

Benjamin wrote:
February 01, 2011

I don't disagree with you Darren, but as an owner of both Para and STI 1911/2011 pistols, I recommend you give them the pepsi challenge. A side-by-side comparison of the two manufacturers show a vivid disparity between materials used and craftsmanship, with a heavy edge going to the STI. Put the same ammo through both and you'll see a noticeable difference in accuracy, as well as a long term difference in how the firearms wear and their overall durability. While I've been more than pleased with my Para 1345, it has required more upkeep and repair than any of my STI 2011s, and is not nearly as accurate. If owning a reliable and quality double-stack 1911/2011 at an affordable price is your goal, the Para is a GREAT way to go. If having the BEST 2011 is your goal, go with the STI ;)

Darren wrote:
January 31, 2011

that thing is expensive. I'll take a Para carry nine for less than half the price, thanks. Same size and weight but not as many rounds. Of course the Para double stacks have got to cost less then this thing.