Ammunition > News

Shooting for Less

With the current shortage of ammunition and components and their increased prices, getting extra time on the range is more difficult and costly. Following the author’s guidelines can help.

The escalating prices of components have caused me to reevaluate my approach to handloading for my semi-automatic handguns. Even small savings on propellant and bullets add up to a significant amount when shooting several thousand rounds of 9 mm Luger, .40 S&W or .45 ACP cartridges. A few dollars can be saved buying components in bulk; however, banking real money requires thinking outside the box of conventional reloading.

Appropriate Propellants
The cost of propellants can be significantly reduced by choosing a relatively fast-burning option that develops the intended bullet velocity while using less powder. For example, a 200-grain cast bullet leaving the muzzle of a .45 ACP at 800 to 850 f.p.s. makes a great practice and plinking load. According to Hodgdon Powder’s 2013 Annual Manual, 6.5 grains of AutoComp are required to reach that velocity level in the .45 ACP. However, only 4.8 grs. of TiteGroup or 4.3 grains of Clays are necessary to attain that speed. By merely switching to lighter charges of faster-burning propellants, up to one-third more rounds can be fired per pound of propellant.

Of course, it’s a good idea to shoot a sample batch to be certain such minimum-propellant charges reliably cycle a pistol’s action. The slide failed to fully seat twice in my Colt Gold Cup National Match shooting 50 .45 ACPs loaded with 200-grain bullets and 4.1 grains of Ramshot Competition with its heavy recoil spring in place. Three .40 S&W cases “stove piped” in the closing slide of a SIG Sauer P226 while shooting 40 cartridges loaded with 3.3 grains of Clays and 180-grain bullets. The SIG, though, chugged along like a steam locomotive shooting 5.1 grains of Ramshot ZIP and 155-grain bullets. The Glock 19 9 mm Luger functioned flawlessly throughout 80 rounds of reduced-volume loads.

These minimum amounts of propellant still developed uniform velocities. Autoloading handgun cases were designed for smokeless propellant, so they have less unoccupied case capacity compared to cases intended for revolvers. The .40 S&W produced velocity spreads of only 15 f.p.s. over 20 rounds, the .45 ACP rounds varied 30 f.p.s. and the 9 mm Lugers spread 19 f.p.s., and that was with propellants dispensed from a powder measure.

Bullet Bargains
There is little sense in shooting an expensive jacketed bullet at less than 1200 f.p.s. from a pistol cartridge for practice. A price check of several reloading supply websites showed .45-cal. jacketed bullets cost nearly three times more than swaged-lead or cast-lead-alloy bullets, which cost about the same. The drawback to swaged-lead bullets, though, is that they are so soft they leave behind increasing smears of lead in a pistol’s bore. And some manufacturers of semi-automatic pistols recommend against using cast bullets in their guns, regardless of hardness, so check your owner’s manual.

But ordinary lead bullets and cast lead bullets are not necessarily the same. The melt of cast bullets is a mix of antimony and tin that hardens lead. A bullet cast of the proper lead alloy and shot at the correct velocity leaves a pistol barrel free of lead. At most, a thin wash of lead remains after shooting several hundred rounds. If leading does occur at the breech, it may indicate that a cast bullet is too soft or hard. A bullet that is too soft leads because it is unable to withstand the pressure and gas erosion. A bullet that’s too hard leads because of its failure to expand and seal the bore against propellant gases that erode up the side of the bullet. If leading occurs at the muzzle, decreasing velocity and switching to a harder bullet and a better lubricant are the cure.

Mold manufacturers recommend casting with certain alloys from its molds to produce bullets of the intended weight and as-cast diameter. For instance, RCBS suggests a lead alloy of 10 percent tin, 90 percent lead for its pistol molds while SAECO recommends Taracorp’s Lawrence Magnum alloy (0.25 percent arsenic, 2 percent tin, 6 percent antimony, 91.75 percent lead) for its molds. Molds are usually cut to drop bullets slightly larger than their intended diameter to compensate for casting with a variety of alloys. Bullets are then sized to exact diameter.

Whatever alloy casters use, they should be concerned about uniform bullet weights, not an exact weight. Some cast bullet companies do not state the Brinell Hardness Number (BHN) of their bullets. Others, such as Missouri Bullet Co., do. Missouri Bullet casts bullets with a BHN of 15 to 18 for 9 mm bullets, 18 for 40-cal. bullets and 12 to 18 for .45 Auto bullets.

To provide a tight seal in the bore, the diameter of cast bullets should be at, or 0.001 inch larger than, the groove-to-groove diameter of a pistol’s bore. Most cast bullet firms produce bullets 0.001 inch larger in diameter than comparable jacketed bullets.

Be aware that seating a larger-diameter bullet may bulge a case and cause the cartridge to fail to fit in the chamber.

Shooting Results
After firing 80 .40 S&W cartridges loaded with 155- and 180-grain cast bullets, I paused to inspect the SIG Sauer P226 for signs of lead fouling. Its feed ramp was clean as a whistle. The bore was somewhat black. A brush loosened the fouling. Like a snooty butler wiping a shelf with a white-gloved finger for dust, I pushed a clean patch through the bore to check for the presence of lead. There was none. After firing 100 cast bullets through my Colt .45 ACP I also examined its bore. It was lead-free. A Glock 19’s bore was clean as a whistle after shooting 80 9 mm bullets cast from a SAECO mold. Where would the lead adhere anyway? The Glock’s hexagonal rifling does away with the sharp edges of traditional grooves and lands. I went back to shooting the pistols, confident the cast bullets were actually improving the pistols by polishing their feed ramps and bores.

That shooting is easy on the pocket, too. A box of 50 .40 S&W cartridges cost about $7 loaded with commercial cast bullets. A box of 9 mm Luger loaded with home-cast bullets costs about $3 and .45 Autos just a few cents more. Those inexpensive cartridges have reined in ammunition costs to enable me to keep shooting my pistols with a tightfisted hold.

Share |

Comments

ADD YOUR COMMENT

Enter your comments below, they will appear within 24 hours


Your Name


Your Email


Your Comment

13 Responses to Shooting for Less

Reloder wrote:
October 30, 2013

Also there are many cast bullets of the 'modified Kieth' design, that have a sharp edge at the base of the ogive, rather than a gradual rounded one. These are more prone to producing small lead shavings as they engage the rifling, and leaving them behind in the barrel. That's why 22 long rifle bores have a tendency to buildup lead in their throat areas, and require frequent cleaning for optimal accuracy. Same principle here. I'm sure this accumulation, in combination with their smooth polygonal bores was enough reason for Glock to void warrantees for cast bullets. So one more clarification to a possible solution: Use only rounded ogive plated bullets, avoiding all modified Keith styles, and no leading or shavings should ever occur with frequent cleaning. That's the best you can do, and quite feasible. Anyone out there with experience using plated bullets in Glocks?

Reloder wrote:
October 29, 2013

Love my 1911 so I'm not a Glock fan, but I did some research to better understand why not to shoot cast in Glocks (aside from just being told not to): 'The advantage of polygonal rifling (Glocks) is that there is less distortion to the bullet and less fouling since the rifling isn't 'cutting' into the bullet. Also less gas leakage around the bullet since the gas can't get by from having no grooves, and also higher resulting velocity. However, the downside is that there are no grooves (1911s) to 'accept' the fouling. Consequently polygonal rifling is more prone to develop a partial obstruction and the resulting higher pressures as fouling occurs.' So the concern is valid. Solution: Plated bullets to the rescue, for Glocks. No big deal, and lead buildup avoided--Yes?

Kevin wrote:
October 29, 2013

Shooting lead in Glock pistols is specifically mentioned as a warranty voiding action

Reloder wrote:
October 28, 2013

I take it back, Midway sells 45ACP cast bullets for as little as 3cents each plus shipping (when in stock), so the author's price of $7/50 (14cents each) is feasible. Our in-town prices are similar, which save or equals the cost of shipping, so I'm not used to ordering from them. The author can stand by his statements, other than current availability issues.

Reloder wrote:
October 25, 2013

Hey, you're right.Though not too hard to get a box of 20 for $7 nowadays, so it may be a typo. In my town, we've got a few entrepaneurs who mine the local ranges for lead and then cast, package, and sell their product at local gun shops and shows, at a very good price to us. Quality stuff, too. If I pick up brass at those same ranges (after carefully checking them, of course), and if I were one of these home casters, then I too could conceivably reload a box of 50 for about $7. Maybe that's what the author's doing.

NewGuy wrote:
October 24, 2013

I'm interested to know where he's getting his .45 cast bullets? I've yet to find them cheap enough to make a box of 50 for less than $7.

S MUELLER wrote:
October 23, 2013

100[%] agree on plated bullets. Check out TwoAlphaSupply. They sell good quality Xtreme bullets.

Jim wrote:
October 22, 2013

Dangerous to shoot cast bullets in a Glock. Leading will occur and can result in a ruptured case and damage to the firearm. Trust me.

Dave wrote:
October 18, 2013

What about plated bullets? Seems like they fit between jacketed and lead, don't they?

Bradley Foster wrote:
October 17, 2013

Another solution that is midway between lead bullets and jacketed bullets in cost is plated bullets. Made by Ranier Ballistics and Berry's, these are lead bullets with a thin plating of gilding metal. They do not lead at all, and are clean to load (no lubricant mess). They do not clog the gas system on certain sensitive semiautomatics (e.g. HK P7). They are relatively inexpensive compared to jacketed bullets.

Steve Thompson wrote:
October 17, 2013

I thought Glock specifically recommended NOT to shoot lead bullets in their barrels. Am I imagining this?

Reloder wrote:
October 16, 2013

One thing to add, the use of inexpensive gas checks seated behind a bullet are another good way to minimize lead buildup. They'll leave your barrel clean as a whistle. But the cost of softer lead bullets + gas checks about equals the cost of just harder cast and no gas checks, so that's a coin toss. Great article on cost savings, thanks. Definitely the way to go, to save your shooting dollars, and get more practice time.

Lee wrote:
October 16, 2013

Great article, tks