Rifles > Bolt-Action

Looking at the Ruger American Rifle

After serious testing, the only question left to ask about the Ruger American Rifle is: What’s not to like?

5/22/2012

For the traditionalist rifle crank, the recent breed of economical, center-fire bolt-action rifles can at first be a bit off-putting. How is it possible to judge wood-to-metal fit if no wood is involved? What aspect of hand workmanship is left to critique if the finished product is merely the result of computer-controlled lathes and injection-molding machines? Finally, what is the raison d’etre of an inexpensive rifle?

The answers, of course, require reassessing whether performance and value count as much as appearance and prestige. Fine traditional guns will always have their place and their admirers; but this is America, where even the budget-minded go hunting and where it is still possible to own and enjoy multiple rifles. The practical justifications for the value-priced rifle, one retailing in the $300 to $500 price range, are myriad. It could be purchased as a knockabout and assigned to an ATV, pickup truck or hunting cabin. Or it could be acquired to try out a different chambering. It might also be the answer for a new shooter wading into an otherwise bewildering array of sporting rifle choices. Regardless, the inexpensive center-fire rifle is here to stay, and even the most died-in-the-wool traditionalists may be happy about that once they find out how well such rifles perform.

Sturm, Ruger & Co. has been providing rank-and-file shooters with value-priced firearms since the late Bill Ruger, Sr. founded the company with his partner, Alexander Sturm, in 1949. The pair’s first product, advertised and later evaluated in The American Rifleman that year, was the Standard Model .22 semi-automatic pistol—a gun made from turned bar stock and welded stampings that not only shot well but was priced far lower than competitive offerings. Although Sturm died shortly thereafter, the success of the fledgling firm’s first product all but assured it a bright future, and it soon turned its attention to what would become its second big hit: the Single-Six revolver. Ruger knew that machining that gun’s relatively complex frame would not allow him to keep its price at a reasonable level. The answer was found in investment casting, a process that would prove to be the company’s catalyst for success. The process allowed components to be produced to near net shape with a minimum of finish machining, saving time and costs. Eventually, Ruger reaped the rewards of its innovative approach to arms making. It even surpassed some of its competitors in the race for American shooters’ hard-earned dollars, and in so doing earned something far more valuable from its customers: devotion to the brand.

The company became a publicly traded entity in 1969, just one year after the introduction of the Model 77 center-fire bolt-action, and in the decades that followed it continued to develop new products based largely on Bill Ruger’s vision of what shooters wanted in their firearms. But after his death in 2002, the company was forced to take a more analytical approach to identifying market demands, developing its “voice of the customer” program, which considered input from gunwriters, distributors, retailers and consumers. An increasingly competitive marketplace also necessitated the emergence of new catalysts for success in the area of production, including: more extensive use of polymer—in frames for handguns and in stocks for rifles; increased use of computer-numeric-controlled (CNC) machining and metal-injection-molded (MIM) components; and lean manufacturing practices. All those approaches and more, including the infusion of new design and management talent hired from competing gun companies and other industries, have contributed to several of Ruger’s biggest successes in recent years, including the LCP and SR9 pistols, the LCR revolver and the SR556 AR-style rifles.

When it came to the company’s latest offering, an entry into the economical, center-fire bolt-action rifle market, “There were several considerations that came to the surface and were non-negotiable,” according to Ruger Product Manager Mark Gurney as he recalled early conversations during the beginning of the gun’s development process. “It had to be accurate. It had to have a good trigger. It had to be capable of being run from the shoulder. It had to be rugged and reliable. And it had to be good-looking,” he said. Add to that, of course, that the new gun had to be economical and had to complement the company’s mainstay Model 77 Hawkeye line, which represented the latest revision of the now 44-year-old design.

That rather tall order was accomplished by building the new gun from a wholly different set of design parameters than had been used in the past. Gurney described it as, “Trying to make things so they go together the same way, the first time, every time.” For instance, unlike the Hawkeye’s receiver, which is made from an investment casting, the American’s receiver is turned from bar stock steel on CNC machining centers, making it even more economical to manufacture. At the time of this writing only long-action models were available, but a short-action was already listed in the 2012 catalog.

The 8 3/4-inch-long, 1 1/4-inch-wide receiver is somewhat hexagonal in cross section with the upper and lower surfaces radiused and the sides flat. Its top is drilled and tapped for included two-piece aluminum Weaver scope bases, and, according to Gurney, a one-piece Leupold base is also in the works. The two 1/2-inch-wide facets on the receiver’s sides feature cutouts for the 3 5⁄16-inch-long ejection port and for the bolt handle notch on the right and the 1/4 x 1 1/4-inch bolt release on the left rear. Two round gas-escape ports are located 15/16 inches from the front face of the receiver on its left and right sides. Using a design similar to that of the Savage Model 110, but through an assembly process that Gurney characterizes as “proprietary,” a locking collar secures the threaded barrel to the receiver’s ring, or front section. He explains that the barrel and the collar are fixtured while a headspace gauge is held in place by a closed bolt and the receiver screwed into position. That way proper headspace is ensured and no further machining is necessary to the bolt face or chamber. The Ruger’s locking collar is much more streamlined with the barrel and receiver contours than that used in the original Savage design and is smooth all the way around with no splines, notches or holes for hook spanners or other wrenches.

Another aspect of the Ruger’s construction that sets it apart from most other factory bolt-actions is its lack of a traditional recoil lug. Generally such a lug is either integral with the receiver’s front or is a separate piece sandwiched between the receiver and barrel. The Ruger instead has two notched, V-shaped, investment cast stainless-steel blocks molded integrally within the stock so as to be permanently imbedded. The blocks, which measure 3/8-inches thick by 1 1/4-inches wide by 15/16-inches high, not only to center the receiver in the stock longitudinally but interface with machined flats on the receiver’s bottom to arrest recoil. In addition, the Allen-head cap screws that secure the action pass through vertical holes in the V-blocks, allowing the blocks to function as pillars and precluding overtightening of the screws. The result—what Ruger refers to as the Power Bedding System—is so unique that the company has filed a patent application for it. It also eliminates the need for traditional bedding compounds and the labor required to apply them. The 22-inch hammer-forged barrel is completely free-floating. It measures 1.155 inches immediately ahead of the locking ring and 0.570 inches at the muzzle and is not drilled and tapped for iron sights.

The bolt is of the full-diameter body design with its main portion measuring 0.849 inches in diameter. It is turned down to 0.692 inches at its front to form a neck before stepping back up to an area measuring 0.782 inches in diameter and out of which the three equally spaced locking lugs measuring 0.46 inches in length and 0.311 inches in width are machined. Again, the design is nothing new—it can be seen on the T/C Icon, for instance—but for Ruger it marks a different direction and further reduces costs by allowing for a receiver that does not have to have raceways cut or cast into it. Instead, the bolt body has a 1/4-inch-wide longitudinal groove in which the bolt release rides, thereby acting as a combination guideway/anti-bind slot. A 1/4-inch gas-escape port in the bolt body is designed to direct escaping gases into the magazine in the event of a pierced primer. The locking lugs, spaced 120 degrees apart, allow for unlocking with a 70 degree lift of the bolt’s handle. The short lift is designed to allow low scope mounting and rapid running of the cock-on-opening bolt. It is aided by dual cocking cams at the bolt body’s rear that act on opposing lobes on the cocking piece. They reduce cocking force, further allowing the rifle to be cycled while firmly anchored in the shoulder pocket and without the shooter having to lower the rifle. A polymer shroud covers the MIM-produced cocking piece, which has a tail that extends 3/16 inches beyond the shroud when the striker is loaded to act as a cocking indicator.

1   2    NEXT >>

Share |

Comments

ADD YOUR COMMENT

Enter your comments below, they will appear within 24 hours


Your Name


Your Email


Your Comment

14 Responses to Looking at the Ruger American Rifle

tracy chaney wrote:
July 20, 2014

Sure you can load single rds.Just pull the mag and load from the bottom.To me a great rifle.Accurate, light,one hell of a shoter.Most of all a American made RUGER.What' not to love!

ken b wrote:
May 05, 2013

I just got one in .308. Very solid feeling gun. I will not be worried about hurting this one taking it afield!

Fdashes wrote:
April 06, 2013

It is not a design flaw as it was designed that way. You may not like the concept though.

chalja wrote:
March 28, 2013

I believe you can still load a single round through the ejection port. Page 15 of the manual, available at the Ruger website for download, states: To single-load: (Safety should be in “Safe” position.) Place a cartridge directly into the chamber and close the bolt. An empty, partially loaded, or fully loaded magazine may then be inserted into the rifle if desired.

hunter yates wrote:
February 19, 2013

Me, i think that gun looks sexy!

Todd Hatch wrote:
December 05, 2012

My 12 year old now shoots one in .270 Win. he loves it. I got it to zero with an eyeball bore site in the field and shoot/cool/shoot firing got it on. He's hitting a paper plate from the standing position at 100 yards. Excellent hunting condition accuracy.

duh wrote:
October 29, 2012

"Can't load a round through the ejection port? A serious design flaw for a bolt rifle IMHO." Only if you can't get it done with the rounds already loaded...

Mack Missiletoe wrote:
August 29, 2012

Maybe it's better than I thought. But it looks ugly as heck. I don't suppose it will have much resell value... Hey I am not hating on it if you like it. It's just that... I have .22's that look nicer than that, so it's looks do bother me. But then, I am one of those guys who mostl ikely prefers wood and steel over plastic

davidm wrote:
August 11, 2012

does ruger make the american rifle chamberd in 25-06 ?

smithman10 wrote:
July 04, 2012

Can't load a round through the ejection port? A serious design flaw for a bolt rifle IMHO.

Doug76 wrote:
July 03, 2012

I got mine! .308, and an excellent shooter.

Bill Bechtol wrote:
June 10, 2012

All test reports in American Rifleman, Shooting Times, & Guns & Ammo have been for the .30-06. Hey it works great in .270 Win too. I was able to shoot 3/4" to 1 1/8" 3 shot groups at 100 yards - no machine rest- just me and my Caldwell plastic 3 legged rest. I used a couple 150 grain Federal Fusion and 150 grain Remington Core-Lokt SP. The felt recoil is not heavy as some bloggers report. I do have some work to do on handloads as my "standards" for my old Remington 700 ADL did not perform up to my expectations.

James C Grogan wrote:
May 30, 2012

I't looks like it will be a very good rifle.

David G. wrote:
May 27, 2012

I'm gonna get me one!