Experts in the Field
FacebookTwitter
YouTubeRSS Feed
Anything But Ordinary: The Chiappa Rhino

Anything But Ordinary: The Chiappa Rhino

The new Chiappa Rhino has turned the revolver world upside down.

By Richard Mann

  • Comment
  • Send to Friend
  • Share This

4/20/2011

Samuel Colt patented his revolver during the presidency of Andrew Jackson. Through the next century the revolver evolved from a single-action, front-loading blackpowder arm to a cartridge-firing, double-action wheelgun. In my opinion, the revolver reached its pinnacle in the mid-1950s with Colt’s introduction of the Python. Since then, the only notable revolver advancements we’ve seen have been more potent cartridges and higher-capacity cylinders. What could possibly be done to the revolver to make it better, or even different?

Emilio Ghisoni, an Italian firearm designer who once patented, of all things, a recoil-operated, semi-automatic revolver, the Mateba, understood that by lowering the axis of a revolver’s barrel in the hand, recoil and muzzle flip could be greatly reduced. To do this, though, would require positioning the barrel so that the revolver fired from the cylinder’s bottom chamber instead of the top.

Working with Italian competitive shooter Antonio Caduzzo, the team produced a unique revolver that highlighted Ghisoni’s signature bottom-barrel design; however, Ghisoni didn’t live to see it become reality, since he passed away in 2008. But, Caduzzo found another partner, Rino Chiappa, owner of Chiappa Group and Chiappa Firearms. Chiappa Firearms is well-known for its replica arms of notable models from Sharps, Winchester and Colt.

The unconventional revolver, coined the Rhino, was introduced at the 2010 SHOT Show. It drew a crowd, mostly because of its unorthodox appearance, but also because of its distinctive design. The response was similar to that of the Glock pistol’s introduction because the Rhino was such a radical departure from the conventional wisdom that dictated what a handgun had to be.

Redefining The Revolver
The Rhino functions as differently as it looks. The geometry of the design seems off because the trigger is positioned about mid-cylinder and the hammer is directly above—as opposed to forward of—the grip. Revolvers also typically have a curvaceous look to them, and if you compare a Rhino side-by-side with a modern revolver, such as the Smith & Wesson Model 36 Chief’s Special, then it looks, well, prehistoric. With regard to its size, the six-shot Rhino is essentially the same length—about 0.2 inches thicker and 1-inch taller—and 5.5 ounces heavier than the five-shot Model 36.

As for operation, forget the established parameters of the conventional revolver. The only similarity the Rhino shares with the modern double-action revolver is that when the trigger is pulled or the hammer is cocked, its cylinder rotates to line up a chamber with the barrel before the gun is fired. The internal lockwork produces the same result, but in a completely different manner.

The most radical departure from the common revolver is the position of the barrel, which made it impossible for a conventional, exposed hammer to work. This is because the cartridge to be fired resides just above the trigger, not near the top strap and in front of a hammer, as found in traditional revolvers. On the Rhino, what appears to be an exposed hammer is nothing more than a cocking lever. Pulling it to the rear rotates the cylinder, and when it is released, the lever falls forward. It may startle those accustomed to a conventional revolver. The lever, however, just actuates the true hammer buried inside the complex lockwork. The single-action firing mechanism within the Rhino operates like a standard striker-fired semi-automatic handgun; by retracting the cocking lever the striker is pre-loaded—comparable to cycling the slide on a Springfield Armory XD.

When the cocking lever is fully retracted a small red plunger, signifying the handgun is in the single-action mode and ready to fire, is visible near the top, rear of the frame. For double-action operation, the Rhino requires only that the trigger be pulled. One difference, however, between the Rhino and conventional revolvers with hammers it that the progression of the trigger pull cannot be observed.

Ironically, the Rhino is uncocked like conventional revolvers: while maintaining a grip on the cocking lever, pull it rearward while depressing the trigger. Then, ease the cocking lever and the trigger forward together. This reverts the revolver to double-action operation.

To the left of the cocking lever, which is notched to serve as a rear sight, is the cylinder-release latch. Depressing the latch frees the cylinder, similar to how the safety of an M1911 is disengaged. It is easily pushed clear of the frame using a single finger. With the cylinder free the ejector rod is visible at the front of the crane for case or cartridge removal—nothing new here.

The Rhino’s ejector rod, crane, cylinder and barrel are steel; however, the frame, which fully encases the barrel, is aluminum alloy. A one-piece, rubber-like boot-style stock fits over the grip frame, and it is held in place by a single screw at the base. The material is soft, pliable and comfortable, but seems a bit under-engineered compared to the rest of this abnormal revolver.

Two other Rhino characteristics worthy of note are the shape of the trigger and the positioning of the cylinder in relation to the hands. The trigger is wide—almost a half inch, which is comfortable and reduces the perceived effort required to pull it. Because the grip axis is closer to the cylinder, you need to make a mental note to keep the thumb of your non-shooting hand behind the gap between the cylinder and the barrel.

  • Comment
  • Send to Friend
  • Share This

Comments

  • Frank

    12/9/2012 4:21:21 PM

    Lark Mason wrote " both the Chiappa Rhino and the Mateba Unica are automatic". This is incorrect. The Mateba Unica 6 was a recoil operated semi-auto revolver. The Chiapa Rhino is not. No part of the Chiappa Rhino action is operated by recoil or gas from the fired rounds 'automatically'. In single action mode, the cocking lever compresses the hammer/striker spring. In double-action mode, the trigger pull alone does that. The Chiappa is not the first low barrel revolver, nor is the DA/SA action revolutionary. It is just unique on the market right now.

  • wonderwheel

    9/19/2012 4:01:21 PM

    This is the revolver used by Annie Walker in the TV series Covert Affairs.

  • Lark mason

    8/9/2012 12:43:23 AM

    To Shaun the Nosorog AEK 906 is only a double or single action revolver; both the Chiappa Rhino and the Mateba Unica 6 are automatic decreasing the trigger pull. That is why they are called revolutionary.

  • Shaun

    4/16/2012 8:22:56 PM

    LOVE my Rhino. Accurate, comfortable, and user-friendly. One note: If you own the 4" barrel version, you will have to have a custom holster made. Even Chiappa doesn't make one. I had a canvas shoulder holster I bought for a large S&W that fit it pretty well, but I'm going to have a leathersmith make a hip holster for it.

  • Shaun Ludwick

    11/29/2011 2:29:29 PM

    I have been following the progress of the Rhino and have a question.... Why does every article tout the Rhino as "revolutionary" or "ground breaking" while consistently ignoring the Russian AEK-906 and AEK-906-1 revolver developed and built two decades ago? I've also scoured the net for info on the AEK-906 and have found very little in the way of details. Can someone please do an article about the original "revolutionary" revolver and give credit where credit is due?

  • D.Bloomquist Sr

    11/4/2011 12:35:22 PM

    Where di I purchase one of these and what outlet handles this pistol

  • Christopher Schultheiss

    4/25/2011 6:36:03 AM

    I purchased a 4 " and 6" Chiappa Rhino and finally got to try out the 4". My personal view of the revolver is 1) I like the unusual appearance that some call "ugly 2) I like innovation (I own 3 Matebas 's 3) The lower barrel alignment makes perfect physical sense however the jury is out as to whether the mechanical complexities will warrant the unusual barrel alignment. 4) Although I can't speak for the actual accuracy because the sight adjustment was off 6" at 25 yds, I didn't have my tool kit with me to adjust the sights. I can say that the grouping was good and I think that ultimately, it will be quite good. 5) I found the recoil and muzzle lift very reasonable for a .357 Mag -certainly much less than a Ruger Redhawk. 6) My wife. a very experienced shooter had difficulty pulling the "hammer" back as she has a bit of Arthritis. 7) Double action function was surprisingly smooth. 8) I felt that the quality of the engineering and manufacturing was very good. Overall In the short term, I am very pleased with the revolver and look forward to shooting it a lot more along with its 6" brother. .