Ammunition > Rifle

Rimfire Screamer: The .17 WSM

Winchester’s new .17 WSM redefines rimfire performance.

It’s almost axiomatic that nearly every rifle hunter starts his or her hunting career with the .22 Long Rifle. And even if they have taken the largest game animals with some big and bellowing magnum, there remains a desire to plink small game and varmints with a rimfire. On a pragmatic note, rimfires are generally quieter than a center-fire; recoil is non-existent; and rimfire ammunition is usually less expensive than its big brothers. On the downside, rimfires have a much more limited effective range due to their lower velocities.

Winchester took a look at this market and developed a project that would bring rimfire bullets up into the lower end of the center-fire velocity envelope. Buoyed by the popularity and success of .17-caliber cartridges—both center-fire and rimfire—the engineers at Winchester quickly determined that would be the caliber of choice. Bullet weights in .17 caliber are about half that of .22-caliber cartridges, so it would be much easier and feasible to get 3,000 fps out of a .17 rimfire than a .22.

Now the problem was how to design a case that would withstand the pressure needed to crack the three-grand velocity barrier. Designing a new case from scratch would necessitate a large investment in cash, but Winchester had a card up its sleeve. Olin—the parent company of Winchester Ammunition—has been supplying a rimfire power source to the construction industry for powder-actuated nail and stud guns for many years. These guns are used to attach metal to concrete, or in some cases, metal to metal. The power source is a .27-caliber rimfire case. So rather than invest in the tooling and manufacturing resources for a new and stronger case, Winchester elected to see what this case could produce, naming the new cartridge the .17 Winchester Super Magnum (WSM).

This introduced a whole new set of challenges in terms of firearm design. It would not be possible to simply ream a .17-caliber barrel with a new chamber because the brass in the head of the case was substantially thicker than other rimfire cartridges. Too, the larger head diameter required the bolt to be redesigned to have the firing pin perfectly located, as well as providing a stronger spring to accelerate the pin enough to reliably ignite the priming compound in the rim of the case. The firing pin was given a round profile rather than the rectangular one normally seen on rimfires in order to concentrate the force on the thicker rim. And, finally, the rifle needed a new magazine design for the larger cartridge.

While other companies are working to bring out a rifle, Savage—a company with a well-deserved reputation for agility in bringing new guns to market quickly—introduced the B.Mag along with the cartridge’s intro at SHOT Show. There were shooting samples available at Media Day—the day before the SHOT Show opened, but winds howling at 30 to 40 mph made shooting the tiny 20- and 25-grain bullets futile. I had to wait until fall before I could get a crack at this new rimfire.

The claims of 3,000 fps for the 20-grain bullets and 2,600 fps for the 25-grainers are accurate. My chronograph showed an average of 3,042 fps with the 20-grain polymer-tipped bullet and 2,636 fps for the 25-grain polymer-tipped bullets. A standard deviation of 22 and 26 respectively indicated that these should be very accurate loads. With a ballistic coefficient of 0.185 for the 20-grain bullet and 0.230 for the 25-grain bullet, these lighter bullets will retain their velocity better than many .22-caliber bullets, but in the end they are very light bullets and therefore will be more susceptible to wind deflection. I went through five different range sessions with the Savage B.Mag before I had it calm enough to get some good groups.

One thing I discovered is that accuracy begins to suffer after 50 rounds or so. A quick swabbing with a patch soaked in bore solvent followed by two or three dry patches took care of that issue, but it is something to keep in mind if you take this rifle/cartridge combo on an all-day varmint shoot.

In a day where so many are necking up and necking down, blowing out shoulders and cases, and then making outlandish claims of velocity and terminal performance when their precious brainchild isn’t really doing anything new, the .17 WSM really does produce some real-world improvements. The .17 WSM has 61 percent more energy with a 20-grain bullet at the muzzle than a .17 HMR with a 17-grain bullet and 19 percent more energy than the .22 WMR with a 30-grain bullet. Muzzle velocities of the three are 3,042 fps with a 20-grain bullet in the .17 WSM, 2,525 fps with a 17-grain bullet in the .17 HMR, and 2,250 fps with the 30-grain bullet in the .22 WMR. Ballistic coefficients for these bullets are 0.185 for the 20-grain bullet in the .17 WSM, 0.125 for the .17-grain bullet in the .17 HMR and 0.095 for the 30-grain bullet in the .22 WMR.

If all those numbers are making your head spin, here’s the meat of it: If you sight in a 20-grain load in the .17 WSM to zero at 150 yards, you’ll be just 0.78 inches high at 100 yards and 2.38 inches low at 200 yards. Translation: Hold on the head of a standing prairie dog 225 yards away, and you’ll center-punch his torso—not too bad for a rimfire. By comparison, the .22 Hornet with a 45-grain bullet will be almost an inch lower at 200 yards. Holding on the head of that same 225-yard prairie dog will give him a hot foot.

Bottom line is this: Winchester’s new .17 WSM provides better performance than a .22 Hornet in a rimfire package that’s less than half the price of the .22 Hornet. Its trajectory is 50-percent flatter than the .17 HMR. I have had a fair amount of experience with both the .17 HMR and the .22 Hornet, and I am a big fan of both. Count me in as a proponent of this new cartridge.

The only fly in the ointment might possibly be distribution. Ammo is already in short supply, and the gun manufacturers are running full tilt to produce guns for a market with an insatiable thirst. If enough rifles are made to keep the market interested and the ammo guys can keep up with the demand, I predict the .17 WSM will be a winner. Just remember to take a cleaning rod, some patches and core solvent with you on an all-day shoot.

Share |

Comments

ADD YOUR COMMENT

Enter your comments below, they will appear within 24 hours


Your Name


Your Email


Your Comment

8 Responses to Rimfire Screamer: The .17 WSM

Bennie Bedenbaugh wrote:
February 10, 2014

I have a Springfield model m1a of course in 7.62x51 !! As you know ammo for this is very costly now !! Have noted that 7.62x54 is a lot less costly !! Assume this will not function in my rifle !! Can this rifle b modified for the cheaper ammo !!

kelly collins wrote:
February 09, 2014

Alan Smythe: You have obviously not read anything on this new rifle before shooting it. It is a cock on closing bolt like an Enfield rifle which means you have to have the manual dexterity and muscle power to push the bolt all the way forward before locking it into shooting position!! Also the stock is not designed for a crow-bar. Most people I have talked o love them so you are the odd man out on this one.

bill wrote:
February 07, 2014

Ruger Should chamber their American in this caliber. Use their excellent rotary magazine for the 22 hornet.

Auggie K. wrote:
February 05, 2014

An amazing Gun & Ammo Combo!! Have been hunting & plinking since i was 8! With my Dad of course at the younger age! Back in the old days when U could walk down the street to go hunting with your friends. Most amazing .17 Cal. I've ever had the privilege of Shooting!!

Alan Smyth wrote:
February 05, 2014

The cartridge is a good cartridge the downfall is the Savage Bmag. I wish I would never have bought one. The stock is a flimsy piece of junk. The clip falls out and the bolt handle turns down with the bolt open. I was expecting the quality rifle that my Savage 17HMR is. The Bmag doesn't even come close.

Cecil Dean wrote:
February 05, 2014

Why waste time on a new 22 caliber when they can not supply the market with standard 22s

John wrote:
February 04, 2014

I'd like to see other manufacturers supply a rifle in this caliber. Nothing against Savage but I'd like to see a Remington 700. Really, how hard would it be?

Hunter wrote:
February 01, 2014

I would like to see a .22 version.