Experts in the Field
FacebookTwitter
YouTubeRSS Feed
The Impossible .22 Rimfire

The Impossible .22 Rimfire

The most popular round in the world is more difficult to manufacture than most realize.

By Michael Bussard

  • Comment
  • Send to Friend
  • Share This

9/10/2010

In the subconscious mind of most shooters, the .22 Short, Long and Long Rifle rimfire cartridges form part of the bedrock of shooting sports. Their ubiquitous availability, affordable price, consistent quality and wide product range are taken for granted. Few shooters stop to consider the many difficulties inherent in the design and manufacture of these cartridges.

If you set out to design a self-contained cartridge that is difficult to make and suffers from numerous design shortcomings, it would be the humble .22 Short, Long and Long Rifle (.22 rimfire).

Design Shortcomings
On a good day, the ignition potential of the .22 rimfire priming system is weak. Because there is no anvil, the lead styphnate rimfire priming compound requires the addition of ground glass as a frictioning agent. Ground glass is not "bore friendly," but without it, .22 rimfire priming will not function. And, to date, no lead-free priming compounds suitable for .22 rimfire have been found.

Ignition begins on the side of the case where the rim is crushed by the firing pin; there is no flash hole to focus the ignition gasses into the center of the powder charge. Failure to press the priming compound reliably and evenly inside the annular rim cavity can lead to misfires and high variations in muzzle velocity.

It is important to remember that the .22 Short and Long Rifle cartridges were originally designed for and loaded with easily ignited black powder. However, smokeless propellants have dramatically different ignition requirements and burning characteristics. Propellant makers soon found that the .22 rimfire design was not friendly to early smokeless propellants. They struggled for decades to find suitable smokeless propellants and the search continues to this day.

Essentially, the .22 rimfire requires unique smokeless propellants with a high energy content that are easily ignited and burn progressively. Limited case capacity dictates a dense powder with a small flake or ball configuration. Propellants with large flakes, sticks or coarse grains cannot be used as they will not drop uniformly through the holes in .22 rimfire plate-loading machines.

To facilitate ignition, .22 rimfire bullets must be heavily crimped into the case mouth to increase shot-start forces. Of necessity, this deforms the bullet. However, even on a good day, only about half of the propellant in a .22 rimfire cartridge burns completely.

The weak case head is the Achilles heel of the .22 rimfire cartridge. For this reason, Maximum Average Pressures (MAP) of .22 rimfire ammunition must be kept below 24,000 psi. Rimfire cases must have enough spring-back to assure consistent extraction in blowback-operated semi-automatic guns, yet remain soft enough to prevent splitting. This is a narrow margin that also eliminates steel as a .22 rimfire cartridge case material. Design parameters require all rimfire cartridge cases to be rimmed. Necked rimfire cases require several additional production steps which adds considerably to their cost. Rimfire cartridge cases cannot be reloaded.

All .22 rimfire bullets tread a fine line between function and accuracy. The bearing surface of .22 rimfire bullets is the same diameter as the outside surface of the cartridge case. This makes lubrication of such bullets difficult as the case-diameter bullets must be lubricated on the outside where it may be wiped off or contaminated. Lubricants for lead, center-fire bullets are unsuitable for rimfire ammunition, and, unfortunately, copper-plating serves no ballistic purpose, does not eliminate the need for lubrication, adds cost and damages the bullets.

Case-diameter bullets also limit bullet shape, weight, balance and bearing surface. Another significant problem is that .22 rimfire bullets have an undersized, cupped base that the propellant gases must expand reliably and evenly into the rifling grooves for proper sealing and stabilization.

Headaches of .22 Rimfire Production
Centrifugal force is used to push the priming compound into the hollow rim of the cartridge case. This is accomplished by dropping a wet pellet of priming compound into the bottom of the cartridge case, inserting a closely fitting steel pin, then using the pin to spin the case at speeds of approximately 10,000 rpm for a few seconds. This is a tenuous process at best and frequently fails to completely fill the rim with priming compound.

Preparing the small, wet primer pellet and inserting it in the cartridge case is hazardous hand work—part art and part training. The moisture content of the priming compound must be carefully controlled within narrow limits, otherwise the mixture will not work at all. The ground glass in the priming compound increases wear on the steel spinner pins and excessive smearing of the priming compound up the case sidewalls (a common problem) can adversely affect ignition and interior ballistics.

Ammunition makers also struggle continuously to find suitable rimfire powders. The ideal .22 rimfire propellant must be competitively priced and compatible with plate-loading systems. It must have a high energy content, ignite easily and burn progressively while leaving a minimum of unburned propellant. Very few propellant powders meet these requirements.

Due to the weak ignition, powder residue from partially burned and unburned powder are constant problems—just ask any indoor shooting-range operator. The high ballistic performance required by many modern .22 Long Rifle loads places severe interior ballistic requirements on propellants. On the other hand, low MAPs can cause uneven expansion of the lips of the cup on the bullet's base and poor accuracy. In some instances, high MAPs can blow the lips of the cup base completely out.

In order to obtain the high muzzle velocities advertised for many .22 Long Rifle loads, MAP limits must be pushed to levels that leave little margin for error given the weak case head. Also, the proper case hardness gradient must be maintained to prevent extraction and/or ejection problems in spite of variations in brass strip and tooling.

Rimfire .22 ammunition makers fight a constant battle with bullet lubrication. It is ironic that such a cheap cartridge requires highly specialized, micro-crystalline, synthetic-base waxes for lubrication and costly systems for application. Often, what works today does not work tomorrow due to minor variations in temperature, humidity, bullet hardness, propellant variations, etc.

Bullet hardness (antimony content) can be a particularly difficult problem as small variations can result in lead buildup of rifle bores and inaccuracy. Rough handling of .22 rimfire bullets on the factory floor can easily have an adverse effect on accuracy.

Crimping the .22 L.R. bullet into the case mouth properly remains a constant problem. Too heavy a crimp may push MAPs over the limit, adversely affect accuracy and cause leading. Too light a crimp may result in erratic breech pressures, high variations in muzzle velocity, excess unburned propellant and malfunctions in semi-automatic firearms. As if this were not enough, the driving knives on the crimping operation mangle the bullet.

Overview of the Impossible
We have seen that the inherent characteristics of the .22 LR rimfire cartridge are its own worst enemy and the leading cause of its manufacturing difficulties. However, before we condemn its design, we must remember that the .22 LR rimfire cartridge is a product of the technology and art of the 19th century. With the benefit of today's technology, ammunition makers produce safe, reliable, low cost .22 LR cartridges of average quality in mind-numbing quantities. However, they cannot produce a match load on demand. That is the art.

On the other hand, the .22 L.R. is nothing if not adaptable. Its repertoire includes instruction, training, practice, qualification, informal competition, formal competition, plinking, pest elimination, small game hunting and even personal defense. Few other cartridges are this versatile. And, that is why the .22 L.R. rimfire cartridge remains a bedrock of the shooting sports.

  • Comment
  • Send to Friend
  • Share This

Comments

  • Greg Hodnett

    3/17/2012 2:49:19 PM

    I used to keep a record of misfires. I found some old pages. I noticed that most of my fail-to-fires came in the early months and years of shooting my current rimfire guns. I haven't had a single misfire in 4 years. I do not clean the bore very often, but I do clean the bolt and chamber areas often. Here is a synopsis of my misfires taken from old records. The prices listed are also old, of course. Remington H.V. $9.70 per brick: 3 misfires per brick. Win. H.V. $11.90 per brick: 1 misfire per brick Fed. H.V. $7.90 per brick: 4 misfires in 6 years (5,500 rounds). 0 misfires in the last 2,000 rounds. Eley Sport $28 per brick: 0 misfires in 4 years (3,000 rounds). CCI, various $35 per brick average: 0 misfires in 8 years (about 600 rounds). I use Eley Sport (1080 vel) most of the time for target work and close squirrels. I think this is very good function quality. I use Federal 510 H.V. for plinking and longer body shots on squirrels. My stash of each brand is less than 2,000 rounds. The next time I buy, I expect the price of Federal 510's will be over $20 per brick, and the Eley Sport will probably be $35 per brick.

  • Jon Edgar

    12/13/2011 8:26:12 PM

    Long ago, I read a pamphlet titled "I, pencil." by Leonard Read. He made a wonderful case for pencil being one of the greatest examples of the glory of modern capitalism. "No one man can make me," the pencil said. It was the result of a highly refined and specialized process. The .22LR is a similar prodigy. Solely by the virtue of its popularity and inexpensive quality, it has risen to a level of sophistication, unbelievably far beyond its more expensive, larger brothers. Thank you for your article. It is truly astonishing how much true genius goes into the lowest and greatest items in the firearms industry. Be mighty, Jon Edgar

  • Blackshirts

    7/23/2011 2:55:51 PM

    I actually haven't had a misfire in the last ~1500 rounds of Federal Lightning. Fed. Champions I get 2-3 a box, but upon reinsertion they have worked. As far as a larger cased .22 it's called a .223.

  • ntrudr_800

    5/21/2011 2:50:32 AM

    Hey I was thinking. Why not improve the .22lr? How about a company update the .22lr with a case design that is larger than the bullet--similar to the .17hmr. But with the same velocity and characteristics as normal .22lr. We can call it ".22li" for ".22 Long Improved." The case could be made thick enough so it would not chamber in a .22lr. It may bring the cost down. Or at least be more consistent... It should NOT be more expensive than .22lr--it would replace the .22 lr. Again the characteristics of it's ballistics would be the same as the .22lr. It would just be of better design and possibly easier to make.

  • ntrudr800@aol.com

    5/21/2011 2:38:53 AM

    Wow. I read a little article that CCI had helped another magazine write. After some thought I realized that .22lr rounds must not be so easy to create. I often ponder how in all the universe is it so inexpensive--and now I will even more so. I did not realize that *ALL* .22lr bullets were the same size as their case. I hade noticed the Federal Bulk that I have was this way, and thought it was strange. Now I realize the improvement of the .22mag and the .17hmr. I can not get over how beautiful a cartridge the .17hmr is--it looks fantastic. I have been eying some .22lr's lately. Maybe I will, again, consider the .17hmr.

  • Glocktogo

    11/24/2010 7:44:26 AM

    I call BS on the folks who say they've never had a misfire with .22LR ammo. If you shoot more than a brick of the stuff you've had misfires. A friend and I were out recently with an assortment of bulk pack, subsonic and target ammo, trying to sight in a .22 rifle at 50 yards. It was nearly impossible to do with the huge ammo variances from three different major brand manufacturers. We had several failures to fire in each type of ammo as well. One subsonic load was so erratic that it would occasionally blow debris back in our faces and the sound signature variations from round to round were significant. I could literally see substantial velocity variations at 12X through the high quality glass on the rifle. Some bullets looked like they were going to fall out of the air before they reached the target, only to strike several inches below the rest. I've chronographed some lots of .22LR that had over 200fps extreme spread within a 10 round string. .22LR is one of the funnest and simultaneously frustrating rounds in existence.

  • jla

    11/3/2010 1:20:04 AM

    TO answer a few of the previous comments about whether the .22WMR & the .17HMR/.17M2 have the same problems as the .22LR, the answer is some, but not all. They still have the problems that come from the design of the case and the rimfire priming system. They do not however suffer from the bullet & lube problems that come from using and outside lubricated bullets as they use a more modern design that does away with the primitive, outside lubricated, heal-type bullet design in favor of conventional jacketed bullets. (This is why the .22WMR's case is larger in diameter than the .22LR's case. The major diameter of the bullet is seated inside the case on the .22WMR and the .17 caliber rimfires in the same way as is done on modern center-fire ammunition.) I've been shooting rimfire rifles and handguns for most of my life, and I've had my share of misfires in that time. Last time I went to the range with a rimfire rifle -- a brand new S&W M&P15-22 -- was the first time I've ever had a rimfire case actually blow out on me though. The rim let go and it blew the extractor clean off the bolt. Fortunately I was able to find all the parts, which were undamaged, and get it put back together.

  • Berne

    10/6/2010 11:49:22 AM

    I dont know who you folks are or what brand of ammo ya'll are using, but *all* 22 ammo has misfires at some point or another. As a lifelong shooter of the rimfire calibers (.22 s,l,lr, wrm & hmr) i've found that all brands of bullets (and i've been through many many many flavors) they're going to misfire at SOME point. Some brands are worse than others - you get what you pay for, but i'll NEVER give up my rimfires.

  • Rick

    10/2/2010 11:29:14 PM

    I am an instructor and work with Civil Air Patrol cadets. We use Remington ammo from the CMP. We use many different types and brands of rifles, including CMP trainers and Ruger 10/22s. We have many dozen misfires across all the rifles in 6 hours of shooting. There are primer strikes on these rounds. The instructors have taken to putting a handful of rounds in their pockets to replace rounds for them as they work on their course of fire. On the plus side, I can teach cadets how to clear misfires . . .

  • STAN

    9/30/2010 9:38:06 PM

    Nothing was said about the WMR. what about the 22 magnum round ?

  • Annie Choakley

    9/26/2010 6:28:15 PM

    I wonder why CCI Standard can't come with a little less lube on it. It's so much lube it eventually shuts off the gun.

  • MIke Peach

    9/24/2010 9:55:41 AM

    It's amazing that some have fired thousands of rounds with no problems. I help teach a CCW class and every rimfire we see fails at least once during 50 rounds. That includes what we would normally tink of as reliable guns. Even so, I enjoy the rimfires and shoot them often.

  • bruggem

    9/23/2010 8:58:01 PM

    why is there no double stack mazines in 20 or 25 rounds for 22 lr pistols for hunting

  • Gary Frey

    9/20/2010 10:03:08 AM

    Unbelievable that I have been using .22s for 50 years with no misfires ever. I have shot competively too (300 rds per day) As a manufacturing engineer I see a simple, easy to manufacture design with tolerances that are easy to achieve. After reading your article I fired my T- bolt several times then ran a cleaning patch through it to examine for glass in the residue. Even under 20X magnification I could not see any. Are you sure it is used???

  • jim hutchinson

    9/16/2010 8:51:31 AM

    I own a number of .22 firearms. I have found over the past 55 years that the one constant is that every gun is most accurate with it's own brand of ammo. I have a Win 52-b rifle that shoots a one-hole group with copper plated 37 gr. hollow-point ammo!( foreign made)Hundreds of squirrels have fallen to head shots with this rig.