Unleaded

Just when the dust bunnies had a few cartridges to keep them company on the shelves, news circulated of the Herculaneum, Mo., lead smelter closing at the end of this year. The NRA/ILA website indicates it is the last lead smelter operating in the United States, although several recycling plants will remain open. Recovering enough metal from batteries and spent cartridges probably won’t be enough to supply recreational shooters, much less fulfill Homeland Security’s 1.6 billion round order, though.

The plant’s demise really began in 2008, when the EPA changed air-quality standards for the first time since 1978. These new standards, according to the ILA report, are 10 times tougher than the ones that at the time forced cars to choke down unleaded gasoline and endangered muscle cars.

A St. Louis Post-Dispatch story in 2010 reported Doe Run, the company that owns the smelter, had hoped to open a facility nearby that complied with the new regulations. That year $933,000 in property tax revenue was paid by the firm and one official said if the plant closes residents will experience a huge increase in city water bills. A St. Louis PBS affiliate indicated in 2012 there would be no new plant and Fox News report earlier this month confirmed the doors would be shuttered and 145 people would lose their jobs on Dec. 31. The operation has been in the city for more than 100 years.

So, where will all the lead for bullets and primers come from? China produces more lead ore than any other country, with Australia a distant, second-place finisher—at less than half of the metal. The United States is third.

Where our bullet lead originates is one thing, but as of Jan. 1 nearly all of it will have been processed somewhere outside of our nation. Many bloggers are reporting they believe bullet, component and cartridge prices will increase, perhaps initiating another ammunition shortage.

Fortunately, Barnes Bullets has ironed out the wrinkles in lead-free bullet technology. Take a look at the company’s TAC-XPD loads, and more than likely you’ll find something for your self-defense needs. And the terminal performance is so good you may never go back.

So the plant closure won’t make us go defenseless, although accurate, mass-produced lead bullets (seen here being produced in a Discovery Channel video) could soon become a collector’s item. As for the Internet claims that shooters are the exclusive target, think again. Fishermen use a lot of lead in their sinkers and jig heads.

Share |

Comments

ADD YOUR COMMENT

Enter your comments below, they will appear within 24 hours


Your Name


Your Email


Your Comment

16 Responses to Unleaded

John C wrote:
December 03, 2013

The bullet producers themselves have alreasy stated they DO NOT buy from this facility anyway. They DO NOT jse primary lead for bullets. They use recycled lead from another plant operated by this same company located 90 miles away from the closing smelter plant. Plus, the lead ore will still come out of US and go to Mexico which has a large smelting industry so no we will not be needing to get it from China.

Will wrote:
November 19, 2013

I worried about this for a little while, then looked at my stash of .223, and realized nearly all of it was either Korean PMC or Serbian PPU.

Left Coast Chuck wrote:
November 15, 2013

Sierra Bullet's response sounds as if it comes from a politician. Sure they are buying their lead from several vendors, but as I pointed out in my first post, no resource is recycled at 100[%]. At some date in the future, whether it is six months or six years, raw material in the form of pure lead from a mined source will have to be introduced into the supply stream. Now, whether it will come from Mexico, China or Australia is the first question and the second question is at what added cost to the end consumer. It sounds as if ranges need to step up their reclamation processes if the lead supply is to remain reasonable. How about depleted uranium? The feds are having a lot of trouble getting rid of their depleted uranium now that Nevada told them they couldn't dump it there. With depleted uranium you could probably fire your .223 with a 150 grain bullet with a 1 in 9 twist rate. If you were man enough, you could fire 750 grain bullets out of your .45 ACP.

Guy J. Sagi wrote:
November 08, 2013

And Sierra Bullets has place this announcement on its web and Facebook pages: The main question asked is “Will this shut down your supply of lead.” The answer to that is no. First, Sierra buys lead from several different vendors to maintain constant supply. Second, this facility only smelts primary lead or lead ore. This is lead ore that has just been brought out of the earth. Sierra uses no primary lead at all and never has, so we use nothing directly from this facility. The lead we buy from Doe Run comes from their recycling facility in Boss, MO that is about 90 miles away from the smelter that is closing.

Guy J. Sagi wrote:
November 08, 2013

UPDATE: Two ammo companies got back to me and here are their comments. Hornady: We have known for some time this was happening and don't see any changes to our flow of raw materials. Federal Premium: At this time we do not anticipate any additional strain on our ability to obtain lead. Federal will be posting this today or next week on its website's FAQs, as well.

Guy J. Sagi wrote:
November 07, 2013

Steve D., you're exactly right on the performance of unleaded bullets. An article by a darned knowledgeable writer currently on our home page details the performance of one of Barnes Bullets' latest self-defense cartridge offerings. Chuck, thank you for the update on the mine closing . I didn't uncover that news, so my thanks are sincere. And Bill I'll be sending notes to a couple of big cartridge/bullet companies asking how much of their lead is smelted in the U.S. I'm not sure I'll get an answer, but if I do, I'll share it with everyone!

Left Coast Chuck wrote:
November 06, 2013

As I understand the situation, Herculaneum was a primary smelter which is a smelting process that takes mined lead and produces pure lead from the mining product. What are left in operation are secondary smelters who take lead that has already been produced and is in products such as lead acid batteries and refine it for reuse. No natural element is reused at a rate of zero loss, so eventually the source of recycled lead will reach a point where primary lead will have to be imported to continue having lead products. So, again, as I understand it, skip is correct that there are still smelters working but they are secondary smelters. Herculaneum was the only primary smelter in existence in this country. It was located adjacent to a lead mine which will also be closing as there is no place to refine its product.

railroad wrote:
November 06, 2013

I hope Skip is right, but I believe he is confusing smelting with recycling.

Smitty112 wrote:
November 05, 2013

The suggestion was made that lead smelting will take place in Mexico, where regulatory oppression is not as onerous as in the U.S.

Guy J Sagi wrote:
November 05, 2013

Hi Skip, you're right there are other, 'smaller' plants that will remain open. Follow the link to the ILA report (with a few more details), and I mentioned it in the blog, too. But, they apparently specialize in recycling batteries and used cartridge components....so I don't know how they're going to keep up with the demand (my blanket 'recycling' label was misleading, sorry). I also wish this was just Internet rumor, but I linked to a bunch of legitimate news stories that detail how this thing started back in 2008 and will come to a summary close on Dec. 31. And I think you're exactly right on rimfire ammo. Everyone who reads this should heed your warning.

Bill wrote:
November 05, 2013

The thing that is not mentioned is how much of the domestic bullet production did they provide lead for? Perhaps Hornady and some others are already importing from China or another country. The question might be, just how much of domestic bullet production did this smelter supply?

Gary wrote:
November 05, 2013

What about car & truck batteries ETC.

Steve D. wrote:
November 05, 2013

From looking at reviews of lead-free bullets, they actually have a better expansion and cause more damage than traditional jacketed lead rounds. In the remote chance that this closing is part of the anti-gun/anti-defense conspiracy, I'd say the result will end up backfiring.

Rick wrote:
November 05, 2013

Misleading, it is the last primary lead smelter. There is plenty of available lead, it just comes from recycling.

Cmfuss wrote:
November 05, 2013

Skip----- there are only recyclers left after doe run shuts down. And with the movement away from lead in batteries and car parts where do you think the recyclers will get their lead from? No where. And the executive branch has the authority to end the Importation of certain goods. They can cut off our supply of lead.

skip wrote:
November 05, 2013

It is my understanding this is not a complete true statement and others smelters are in operation and will continue to be. If it were true... how would Hornady and other bullet makers stay in business, how would 22LR survive and be cost effective. I think this report has taken a myth like acceptance and flown about the internet at mach speed without any truth to it.