Ruger's CEO Speaks Out

I’m strolling the IWA firearms and hunting trade show in Nuremberg, Germany looking for interesting story material from the heartland of hunting country. Germany boasts more hunters than any other country in Europe and hunting is more like a religion here than a sport, hobby or pastime. It takes in excess of two years to pass the German hunting license exam and the “jager” tradition here is steeped in ritual and romance. A wild boar or roe deer is toasted when it’s shot and a ceremonial “last meal” is placed in its mouth as a token of respect.


So what do I find here in Germany? A great chance to interview the CEO of Sturm, Ruger & Co.


I’m walking into Hall 2, on my way to look for something German to write about, and I see Mike Fifer in the Ruger booth, relaxed and alone. That’s weird. CEOs of companies the size and importance of Ruger are usually secreted in meetings with key customers or other VIPs during trade shows. I veer off and approach him.


Two uninterrupted hours later, the affable chief executive looks at me and smiles and says: “I think this is the longest interview I’ve ever given.” I nod my thanks as I think to myself, “Only at IWA, the show where no one knows your name.”


The beauty of a show like IWA is that guys like Mike Fifer are not swamped with a meeting schedule. You can catch them in their booth, talking to passers-by and, quite by chance, buttonhole them for an in-depth interview.


The first topic Fifer wants to address is what he feels is a grossly unfair situation between the ease with which foreign gun companies export to the U.S. and the hurdles American gun companies face in selling guns overseas.


“I’m calling for a tit-for-tat policy. If the number one and number two handguns in America are from European countries that totally prohibit U.S.-made handguns, then we should reciprocate. We will have a perfect mirror. We’ll follow whatever they do. If their regulations loosen, ours will loosen. If theirs become more strict, ours will become equally strict. We’ll do the same as they do. Tit-for-tat,” Fifer said.


Clearly, Ruger’s new CEO (he came aboard in mid-2006) is chafing at the unfair trade bit that’s placed in America’s mouth by foreign countries with highly Draconian gun laws. The first and second place handguns he refers to are the Glock and the XD, from Austria and Croatia respectively. “I can’t sell any handguns in either of those countries,” he huffs.


I respectfully point out that free trade is not an issue that any one industry can affect because America’s trade polices are a complex web of issues that span everything from farm subsidies to banana tariffs.


“I’m not talking about tariffs or taxes. I’m referring to regulations that prohibit us from selling into a country that has no such restriction to stop them from selling to us. A simple tit-for-tat policy would level the playing field for all of us,” the former Naval Academy graduate said.


To add insult to injury, the U.S. government recently purchased 200,000 (not a typo) Glock pistols for the Iraqi police. According to Insider sources, the non-competitive deal didn’t allow Ruger or any other American company a chance to bid; it was a slam-dunk for the Austrians, orchestrated by former Georgia Congressman Bob Barr who is employed by Glock as a lobbyist.


Granted, Ruger has some obstacles in exporting handguns and faces stiff competition from European gunmakers like SIG, Beretta, Glock and XD, but there are some successes. One of the most notable of them is right there in the booth with us, the Ruger LCP .380 Auto.


Find out what Michael Fifer has to say about some Ruger's newest products and the direction he's taking the company in my next Industry Insider blog.


 


Share |

Comments

ADD YOUR COMMENT

Enter your comments below, they will appear within 24 hours


Your Name


Your Email


Your Comment

7 Responses to Ruger's CEO Speaks Out

Stephen Messinger wrote:
March 28, 2010

Give Ruger, Browning and Smith and Wesson products a faithful chance before paying your American dollars on foreign firearm products. Remember how car owners wrapped their American flags around their Toyotas, Nissans, BMWs and HYundais after 9/11 to try to show how American they were. Forget about foreign trade restrictions, it is the American consumers' choice of purchasing American products that will get our economy moving.

James Tiede wrote:
March 26, 2010

That these restrictions exist upon citizens and the market of those countries is hardly a reason to impose even more restrictions upon the American firearm enthusiast. That they build fine quality firearms is no reason to punish them (Glock and Sig Sauer do much of their assembly here and Glock is, in fact, working to produce firearms entirely in the U.S. and Heckler and Koch and Beretta already do). Mr. Fifer, I implore you, restrictions on markets are never the answer to inequality. In all cases, if any company improves its products (a task of which Ruger has done a fantastic job in a few years) they'll beat a path to your door. I own several Ruger firearms and have a soft spot for them as a 10/22 was my very first firearm. My daily carry firearm is an HK, though, because of superior performance and fit and finish. Remember that there exist elements whose sole task is to eliminate all privately owned firearms. Bear this always in mind, if you become an ally of them, you will alienate millions of firearms owners in this country who already feel threatened from every angle. Continue to improve your quality, even if it means higher prices, it will still mean better value (Ruger is well known for excellent value) and the marketplace will continue to respond, as it has to the SR-556, LCR and LCP. Continue to develop the SR9, it's got the basics, it just needs better fit and finish. Please, again, Mr. Fifer, don't advocate more restrictions on a market already beset with 20,000 laws.

Andrew Friedman wrote:
March 26, 2010

David, I want to thank you for deciding for all of us whether or not Ruger has made a better firearm than Glock. You miss the point completely. It is up to the market to determine what they want to buy and as to its quality. The issue is that Ruger and other American firearms are not even allowed to enter certain foreign markets to compete on a level playing field, and that just isn't right.

Ben Leuenberger wrote:
March 26, 2010

I could not agree more with what the CEO of Ruger stated, regarding the trade restrictions of Austria and Croatia. That is an outrage and must be changed ASAP. Knowing what I know now, I would not even consider buying one the guns in question. Too many other great guns out there, both US and European, that do not hamper trade.

T. Phillips wrote:
March 25, 2010

I have had the pleasure of seeing Mr Fifer at a couple of other different venues,, such as the SHOT Show. His accessability, and willingness to be available to the average guy is not just at IWA. He is the same way at other shows. He is truly an avid promoter of Ruger firearms, and will fight hard to be the best firearm company CEO in the industry. He is quite the gentleman as well. I always look forward to seeing him,, and talking to him.

Thomas J. Bedsole wrote:
March 25, 2010

Amen, The gentleman is right. We should quit importing anything from them that do not allow us to export to their country. We could also consider maybe redirecting the foreign aid to help our country in its time of need by reducing our debt.

David Laden wrote:
March 25, 2010

Ruger has had 20+ years to come up with a pistol better than a Glock. That they, IMO, have not done so is their problem, not mine. I don't want government forced limitation of my gun choices just because some company cannot get it together.