The Armed Citizen® September 2010

*A 15-year-old boy was alone in his mother’s apartment when he heard a strange sound. Upon glancing into the living room, he discovered a masked man armed with an illegally possessed firearm. Police said the boy fled to his mother’s bedroom and grabbed a .22-cal. pistol. He then locked himself inside the attached bathroom and listened to the burglar ransacking the home. When the burglar attempted to enter the bathroom, the boy fired three shots. The burglar fled the scene. It is unknown if he was injured. (Times Daily, Florence, AL, 06/18/10)

*Desperate for narcotics, a man wearing a ski mask and armed with a spear and a baseball bat burst into a pharmacy. Technician Paul Hemmer confronted the masked man before he had a chance to toss the spear. Police said Hemmer drew his licensed handgun and asked the man, “Do you really want to do this?” The masked man considered Hemmer’s logic for a moment and quickly fled the scene. Law enforcement lauded Hemmer’s actions. “Not only did Paul Hemmer defend himself, co-workers and a customer … he also prevented dangerous drugs from getting out on the street,” said Sullivan County, N.Y., Sheriff Michael Schiff. “Mr. Hemmer acted courageously and with great restraint.” (Daily Freeman, Kingston, NY, 06/04/10)

The Armed Cititzen Extra

(The following account did not appear in the print version of American Rifleman.)

When three 20-something men entered a mom-and-pop tire shop wielding guns and demanding money, the shop owners—a man and his wife—were prepared. As her husband handed the cash over to the intruders, Kimberly Llorens ran out the back of the building to grab her Colt .25 pistol. As the men took off, Kimberly chased after them and fired a shot at their legs, causing them to drop the tray of money they had just stolen. The couple was able to get $235 of the stolen money back. The Bellmead police were still in search of the criminals when this article went to press. (Waco Tribune-Herald, Waco, TX, 5/15/10)

From the Armed Citizen Archive

September 1976: Elmo Ethington's wife telephoned him at home and told him that the Simpsonville, Ky., bank she manages had been robbed. Ethington ran to his car, took the nearest road, and shortly encountered the robber's car. He gave chase, first on the highway and then on foot, subdued the thief at gunpoint, then flagged down a highway patrolman who took the man into custody. (The Daily Press, Newport News, VA)

Share |

Comments

ADD YOUR COMMENT

Enter your comments below, they will appear within 24 hours


Your Name


Your Email


Your Comment

12 Responses to The Armed Citizen® September 2010

Flu-Bird wrote:
March 30, 2011

This is one of the reasons we have the 2nd amendment for armed self defense all those politicians supporting gun control,gun confiscation are the biggist buddy to these thugs there ever was

Tim wrote:
September 07, 2010

On the story about the mom and pop tire store it states that the wife chases the perps down shooting at there legs. In FL you are not to give chase. Soon as they left the thret on ones life were gone. We are tought here never to give chase. 200+ $ is not worth my life nor the event where one of thoes bullets hits someone els.

BCHoop wrote:
September 03, 2010

Armed clerk foils robbery http://www.kmbc.com/video/24837823/detail.html

Jack wrote:
September 01, 2010

people, since when did americans have to let the police "retrieve" stolen property, or wait for the HRT to come rescue us when the criminals take hostages. I say Way to Go! chase those criminals, shoot the man ready to murder you. America will always be the land of the free because of people like this who go above and beyond. Hear this: the day the american czitizens hand over their guns and their righ to defend what theyve worked their whole life for, is the day America will fall.

B.Horvath wrote:
August 31, 2010

I believe that the main point to observe with all of the stories is that bodily harm and death of innocent people is spared because of our right to own firearms. "The Armed Citizen" is not a course on self defense and should not be construed as such to warrant a critique of technique.

M Fayard wrote:
August 31, 2010

Really? What constitutes trianing to a high level? The police who are only required to quailfy once every 18 mos. or the person who goes to the range 2 or 3 times a year. Unless they are on the swat or srt, anything extra is up to them on their own dime, and unfortunately, most have other things to do. And in my experience, the gun you have is better than the gun you don't have.

Jimbo96 wrote:
August 31, 2010

Having used a .22WRFM to save my life back in 1973 I have got to say that any firearm can be used to defend yourself successfully. The only problem was it was a 2 shot derringer and only 1 of the 4 ended up dead with what would have been a 5X shot. The other round went wild due to being struck in the head with a club as I fired. It made case law in CA, any death relating from the commission of a felony is murder in the first degree (PC 187). I now live in a shall issue state and am armed at all times, as I am alive today because of being armed in the past and am still not ready to take a long dirt nap without a few pall-bearers along with me.

John Volkening wrote:
August 31, 2010

I agree with Brad. Once a robber is running away, a firearm should not be used. The victims life was no longer in danger, and innocent people could have been harmed by this reckless shooting. As law abiding citizens who carry, it is our responsibility to use our firearms properly and safely to defend LIVES, not property that can be replaced. I don't like that the robber was getting away, but sometimes you have to let the police do their jobs too!

D Sheets wrote:
August 31, 2010

1. Chasing anyone with a .25 is less then optimal 2. Most folks are not trained to a high level in the use of defensive firearms. 3. End results count. You dont want AR cherrypicking all the stories they put in here or it will reduce AR credibility.

R Andnerson wrote:
August 24, 2010

I agree that a running gun battle is usually a terrible idea. I do not agree, however, that the incident was over. It appears that the robber still held the victim's property which she rightfully acted to recover. I too would pursue the robber only, rather than firing on the run I would have put myself in an optimal position to employ effective fires.

Brad Frese, NRA Instructor wrote:
August 21, 2010

The article says, "as the men took off, Kimberly chased after them and fired a shot at their legs..." In one tiny phrase, two very bad mistakes are described, and should not be held up as an example of a good use of a firearm for self defense. First, she pursued the robbers after the incident was over. Second, she shot at the legs of the bad guys. The description makes it sound like both the perpetrators and the victim are running. This is not a type of shot that has much success in hitting its mark, and has a high percentage of hitting innocent bystanders. This example should be pulled from this "extra" edition of the "armed Citizen."

Kim wrote:
August 20, 2010

They don't put this in the news.