Iain Harrison: Get Rid of the Politics

So, did anyone notice the connection between the firearms on last night's show? I had the opportunity to choose just about any firearm in the inventory of the the biggest prop house on the west coast, but went with a few familiar friends in the AR15, the FN-FAL, Browning Hi-Power and SIG, figuring that most firearms aficionados had shot at least one of them. They'd also been mostly absent from the show so far. In case you were wondering, they're all variants of guns that have shown up in British service over the years. If only I could have snuck in a WG revolver and an Enfield...

Going back to the Top Shot set was a little strange at first. As a competitor, your every move is controlled according to the shooting schedule (cameras, not guns), and you're allowed very little insight as to what's going on outside of the house or range. As part of the crew, you get a birds-eye view of the process and how all the little cogs and springs interact to create the final product. It was an eye-opener, not in the least because of the amount of planning and scheduling involved in creating the challenges, most of which are planned months in advance and involve special effects guys, carpenters, painters, a firecrew and, of course, the armorers and expert.

I also got to see some of the technology involved in capturing images of a bullet in flight, which for a fan of technology is worth the price of admission alone. If you'd like to see more of what a camera capable of 40,000 frames per second is capable of, go to Google.com and search "Phantom Camera." As an aside, firearms manufacturers are finding high speed cameras to be very useful in product development - according to my sources, Ruger has been using one for some time now and utilized it extensively in research and development on the new LC9 pistol.

Last night's first challenge proved difficult for some of the shooters that have been dominating the field so far. The difference between Jamie and Brian's time was over a minute, which must have seemed like an eternity when he was returning to the bench. Most of the shooters smoked the pistol stage, which was to be expected as long guns are actually more difficult to shoot under those conditions - the handgun allows the shooter much more opportunity to isolate motion from the platform as there are three more joints between it and the gun. Those 100-yard targets are awfully small when the front sight is dancing all over the California landscape.

I'm still not convinced that the producers made the right choice when it came to the process of selecting who would go to elimination. Although it made for good TV and no doubt caused a good deal of controversy, at this stage in the game during Season 1, all the eliminations were performance based and I believe a lot of viewers prefer that format. We'll see what changes are made in Season 3 - hopefully the politics get factored out of the equation. Next week sees the contestants hoisted to the top of a crane, then dropped with a Glock in their hands. I got to try this out while on set  and I guarantee it's as much fun as it sounds.

Share |

Comments

ADD YOUR COMMENT

Enter your comments below, they will appear within 24 hours


Your Name


Your Email


Your Comment

8 Responses to Iain Harrison: Get Rid of the Politics

edd j wrote:
April 25, 2011

i agree with paul r about the guys backstabbing the sailor (jamie) i beleive. need to take politics out, good example is the last 5 guys against jamie. make it some way peformance based. total points of all contests to date, last two go against each other. you will still have a favorite to root for out of those two.

paul r wrote:
April 15, 2011

the backstabing by the marines against the sailor are not needed. the marines just prove that some of them are full of junk.

Steve T. wrote:
April 14, 2011

Iain, since you were able to choose the firearms out of "the biggest prop house on the west coast" can you let us in on why the TZ99 was chosen last season instead of the Sig P226?

Jake Gutierrez wrote:
April 14, 2011

I always wondered if they put the cameras away and just " shoot " as they say. Totally agree about the politics too

John wrote:
April 14, 2011

Frankly, if it was performance based, Ashley would have been gone long ago. He got smoked by Kent more than once, but they kept nominating him and Jay, even though they were supposed to be doing it "fair" on the Blue team.

Eddie wrote:
April 13, 2011

Unfortunately, I doubt that the producers of Top Shot will take the politics out since that is what these types of shows go for. This is not the wide world of sports, it is a reality show, those thrive on drama, not sprtsmanship. I would be really suprised if the producers of Top Shot take the politics out of it since to them, that is the show, not the shooting.

Dennis Santiago wrote:
April 13, 2011

Totally with you on going performance based in the individual phase of the series. I wasn't comfortable with it either. It detracted from enjoying some truly excellent shooting trying to adjust to a format of competition alien to the shooting community. P.S. I enjoyed the heck out of testing that selection of firearms for the show. It was good to see you as one of the black shirts.

Jamie Franks wrote:
April 13, 2011

You got to do the Crane? I didn't know that! I couldn't agree with you more, and I can not begin to tell you how disappointed / upset / stressed I was to find out that we were still going to be having Nomination Range in the Green jerseys. I did not / do not agree with that format. I would much prefer the Season-1 method.