Enough Gun?

It’s fun to play off the title of a great book by Robert Ruark—“Use Enough Gun.” Ruark was writing about Africa and dangerous game hunting, and when you are facing some humongous beast that can kill you in an instant, it is wise to use all the gun you can manage. Most people never get to fire one of those big .470 doubles, so they nod wisely at the title and agree. The key element in the equation is “all the gun you can manage.” I believe that most defense shooters never really determine what they can handle. Further, I’m guessing that they can probably use a lot more gun than they realize. Guns are mysterious things to most people, having been formed by the chronic mis-use of firearms on TV and in the movies. Most new shooters choose a firearm for personal defense on the basis of a brief conversation with an enthusiastic young man at a gun store counter. While it is logistically difficult to pull off, a beginner really needs to shoot a variety of calibers, styles and models of guns before choosing. Unfortunately, this is probably not going to happen.


In the sense of terminal effectiveness, it should be obvious that the gun that delivers the greater blow to the target is closest to achieving the mystical “enough gun” status. In spite of how well they are managed, some guns are inadequate in the sense that they don’t develop enough energy to stop a criminal attack quickly. I have strong personal beliefs about light cartridges and would not consider anything lighter than .38 Spl. in revolvers or 9 mm Luger in pistols. On the other hand, I have witnessed a wide variety of beginner handgunners of both sexes, as well as different sizes and shooting backgrounds, in the course of their training at Gunsite. With the quiet, systematic and well-organized training system in use there, complete neophytes acquire strong shooting skills very quickly. And that is really the major point. The firearm is only a part of the defensive system; the shooter’s skill and mindset are far more important. 


Training is the way to close the confidence gap in personal defense. You cannot buy some mystical ideal gun that will make all the boogey men go away. But in the process of developing serious shooting skills, you will find that you can handle a lot more gun than you thought you could.


Share |

Comments

ADD YOUR COMMENT

Enter your comments below, they will appear within 24 hours


Your Name


Your Email


Your Comment

6 Responses to Enough Gun?

Tom wrote:
July 03, 2012

As a LEO, I always carry a pistol. When off duty, I at least carry my Ruger 380 LCP which fits in the pocket of my shorts. When going into rough spots on and offduty, I carry both my Sig 9mm 228 and my little Ruger. I think having a pistol with you is still more important than caliber.

Chuck wrote:
July 03, 2012

Mark, I've been involved in too many cases where the perp, while unarmed, tried to attack the shooter armed with .45 acp, .44 magnum to .45LC. Of course, the end was always the same, the perp wound up face down in the dirt. It amazing how many times that has happened. Almost any LEO can tell you of people he has known where that has occurred, if not to him. Never count on the presentation of a weapon to deter a criminal.

Christopher Hill wrote:
July 02, 2012

I recently came across a handgun stopping power study that was conducted by a veteran law enforcement officer. Ohio-based Active Response Training President/Primary Instructor Greg Ellifritz analyzed 1,800 shootings over a 10-year period and found "there really isn't that much difference between most defensive handgun rounds and calibers." Definitely contrary to what I would have thought:

Rick wrote:
July 02, 2012

9 mil with milspec hardball? Not good. 9 moil with good hollow point defensive ammo? Good enough.

Gary wrote:
June 27, 2012

The .45 ACP was designed to duplicate the power of the great .45 Colt, the most powerful handgun cartridge ever used on the field of combat. The soldiers being trained on the M1911were unaware that they were shooting too much gun and should be afraid of it. They just knew that the .45 ACP was a life-saver on the battlefield and they were glad they carried it. And then NATO shoved the 9mm down our throat. Despite all the history of 35 caliber failures, from both the military and law enforcement, here we were again with an inadequate sidearm. But the equally appalling tragedy was the misinformation being sown that the 9mm was “enough gun” because it was our standard-issue sidearm. You have to believe Mr. Clapp when he tells you that there are meaningful differences in power between the minimum and preferable choices in self-defense cartridges. If you are physically able to handle a .45, why would you handicap yourself with a 9?

Mark A wrote:
June 26, 2012

I am a firm believer that a gun with a barrel big enough to stick your finger down it demands a certain level of respect, and is probbaly adequate for the job of personal defense. If nothing else, the intimidation factor for the perp staring down a barrel that size has a certain detrimental factor on his psyche.