Experts in the Field
FacebookTwitter
YouTubeRSS Feed
The M14 Enhanced Battle Rifle (page 2)

The M14 Enhanced Battle Rifle (page 2)

The changing nature of the war in Afghanistan led to the re-issue of the 7.62x51 mm NATO M14 rifle.

By Maj. John Plaster, U.S. Army (Ret.)

  • Comment
  • Send to Friend
  • Share This

The EBR & EMR
When the U.S. Army and Marine Corps later sought modernized M14s, Armstrong merely switched the Navy’s Mk. 14 Mod 0 rifle’s short barrel for a full-length 22-inch version to create the Army’s Enhanced Battle Rifle (EBR) and the Marine’s M39 Enhanced Marksman’s Rifle (EMR). These versions measure 38.5 inches overall, with the stocks collapsed, and 45 inches when fully extended.

Although 3 pounds heavier than the standard M14, the EBR and EMR compare favorably to America’s current 7.62 mm sniping platforms, such as the Army’s M24 and M110, and the Marine Corps’ M40A3. The Army is issuing two EBRs per infantry squad, while the Marines have placed the EMR at platoon-level.

The Army EBR is fitted with a Leupold 3.5–10X scope, and the USMC’s EMR optic is the Schmidt & Bender M8541 Scout Sniper Day Scope, the same scope used by Marine snipers. Thus equipped, these designated riflemen have the ability to engage enemy personnel to 800 meters.

Each service is now building its own rifles, with Navy Mk. 14 Model 0’s being produced at the Crane facility, while Army rifles are assembled at Rock Island Arsenal, Ill., and the USMC version at Marine Corps Base Quantico, Va.

Some 5,000 EBRs have been produced at Rock Island Arsenal, with funding for another 1,200. A further 2,000 Sage stocks have reportedly been sold directly to military units and individuals for conversion of M14s. Still more rifles issued to Marines and SEALs suggest that perhaps 10,000 of these modernized M14s are now in service.

Firing The EBR
Thanks to Fulton Armory of Savage, Md., I was able to test fire a platform nearly identical to the EBR. Available to civilian shooters, this semi-automatic-only rifle incorporates Fulton’s own M14 Receiver, installed on the same Sage Int’l chassis stock that David Armstrong designed.

Examining the rifle in my shop, I found that its military two-stage trigger broke cleanly at 3 pounds, 7.5 ounces—about perfect for me. For test-firing, I mounted a Bushnell Elite 6500 4.5–30X Tactical Scope, which was a simple task with the rifle’s Picatinny rails.

Ergonomics had concerned me because of the stock’s square edges. Nonetheless, I found its balance and heft surprisingly good with the center-of-balance at the magazine well. Having trained on the M14 in the 1960s, I already appreciated the reliability of its gas piston and operating rod system, and the action’s resistance to sand and carbon buildup. Of course, I experienced no stoppages or malfunctions of any kind.

Weighing 14 pounds with a scope, a bipod and a loaded 20-round magazine, this weight plus the straight-line stock resulted in a mild recoil “push,” making it very comfortable to fire. This also assisted target reacquisition for follow-up shots.

The basic difference between the military EBR and Fulton Armory’s version is a National Match barrel—and that really showed on the range. Accuracy with the Fulton Armory EBR was impressive. Firing off sandbags at 100 yards, my Federal Gold Medal Match, .308 Win., 168-grain ammunition punched a three-round group measuring 0.721 inches. Switching to the U.S. military’s load specifically designed for sniping—the 175-grain, M118 Long Range round—the rifle fired even better, scoring a 0.50-inch three-round group.

In the hands of a trained marksman, the EBR—especially with a National Match barrel—is more than capable of dealing with insurgents to 800 meters and beyond. Perhaps the Taliban and its allies have proven adaptable; but, as demonstrated by these 21st century M14s, so have we.

  • Comment
  • Send to Friend
  • Share This

Comments

  • John

    5/19/2013 4:22:45 PM

    I was trained on the M-14 & M-16 , and others - in late 1969 I served with NATO and we were issued a small carbine - had a 30 round banana clip - do you know this weapon and specifics ? thanks

  • Joe Bob

    3/27/2013 5:40:11 PM

    I got excited about getting oneof these till I che ked the price and accuracy gurantee. My Remy R25 will shoot sub moa with match ammo for 1/3 the price.

  • Jim

    3/6/2013 7:27:17 PM

    What a perfect end to the story of the M-14 - its a great rifle with a tough start and a very commendable final ending.

  • Pete

    12/31/2012 9:35:39 PM

    @Kevin, here is the link: http://www.fulton-armory.com/fultonarmoryusriflecal762mmm14-1-1-1-1-1-2.aspx

  • H

    12/21/2012 6:28:07 PM

    My favorite weapon to carry in Afghanistan. A pain in the butt to clean in dusty environments but very reliable even when it was dirty.

  • Kevin

    12/2/2012 9:46:53 PM

    Can anyone link me to where i can purchase this weapon?

  • TET

    7/17/2012 5:27:29 PM

    I hit Nam with a M14 an little fear. It never let me down and I was a very good shot. With a country boy training at home I could gust about hit anything I shot at. I was lease than happy about the M16 they gave me. Thats just the country boy that wants a real gun.

  • Kevin

    3/31/2012 7:14:32 AM

    The M14 EBR is made even better by adding the V2 EBR trigger shoe. The all steel V2 EBR trigger shoe is made with the correct angle required to direct the trigger pull more to the back than up. Why? Because the M14 trigger is designed to be pulled in more of an upward direction. The original trigger is not designed to work well with the angle of a pistol grip. The V2 EBR trigger shoe is wider and longer than a stock M-14 trigger. It is very comfortable and the tip of the trigger can no longer stab your finger tip.

  • Ken

    3/17/2012 12:41:09 PM

    Steve, Both Norinco and Polytech (both Chinese companies) offered Chinese built M14s in the past. Quality varied between individual rifles but the general consensus is they are decent, but not good, with the Polytechs generally being better than the Norincos.

  • Steve

    3/3/2012 9:28:32 AM

    My sons father inlaw has a M-14 and on the receiver it say's China. Did they ever make the M-14 with parts from China

  • Jared

    1/21/2012 11:55:16 PM

    Isn't the carbine a .308 x 37? Thats why we need the M14 frame .308 x 51. More pop!!

  • Jamezb

    10/9/2011 3:27:38 PM

    Remember the Newer..Superior...AR10, is only a tiny bit younger than the "old, outdated M14. Both rifles are around 50 years old. Just because a design is old, doesn't mean it's service life is over. Witness the continued success of the Ma Deuce and the B52! How old is the USMC combat knife? 70? When you reach the top, there is no point in attempting to climb higher.

  • 82nd

    9/23/2011 2:41:32 PM

    Allot of second-guessing by the arm-chair commandos. However, the SEALs can, and do, get whatever equipment they want, including super secret and expensive stealth helicopters. So, their decision to modify and use the M-14, rather than something new or different, speaks volumes.

  • Robert Taylor

    5/4/2011 6:17:47 AM

    I have a M-14 just like I had in the Army in 63-66. Where can I buy a stock like; EBR EmRin you article?

  • grendel361

    3/18/2011 12:39:05 PM

    I believe the arguement is moot with the fielding of the FN SCAR. Lighter, smoother, more accurate that ANY m-14 variant could ever hope to be. Only time and body count will tell

  • Pete

    3/8/2011 6:24:32 AM

    Would rather see an increased quantity of hi altitude bombs on those Afghan mountains. why let our guys go hunting at this point? However, was springfield's socom not even in the mix? Maybe it was a case of use up the m14's bc we have them already... @800 yards & expecting hits on bad guys, u better be squared away w/ the 308. Plus, how long do you expect those barrels to retain their Nat'l Match quality?? better yet to just go bigger as long as u are carrying a really heavy gun, add more m2's and 300 win mag's.

  • MarineSRT

    3/1/2011 8:01:44 PM

    @Wiggy, Obama may try and change things, but actual combat situations will always override politicians wants and or logic. Combat is a man's arena. Only because of technology do we see females do things they can't do naturally without technology. And yes that was discriminatory and was meant to be so. Not all discrimination is bad, we all do it every day on some level with something.

  • MarineSRT

    3/1/2011 7:57:14 PM

    I see the questions of why go with an older design. But the error is assuming that because something is older means it is outdated. Yes the AR-10 could be a viable option in gas-piston. But in reality the M1A has already proven itself in more theaters than than the AR platform has been around. Does that mean we don't use the AR? Of course not, but the M1A works like a horse and does not foul or break down, much like an AK-47. The EBR is not just a restocked M1A, it is an evolution of a great design made even better. Since AR-10's are not in service they would need years of testing and submissions from contractors for evaluation. The SEALS who requested the EBR new this and the expedient option was to upgrade the M1A to their needs. The guns WORK! They work so well that the Marines, Army and Coast Guard also use the format. It's cost effective and as I said expedient.

  • HwyPilot

    3/1/2011 4:46:34 PM

    It's typical that US armed forces would shell out piles of cash to resurrect an old weapon (just try to find parts for it in the field). I'll be that aluminum stock feels outstanding on your cheek during a cold desert morning! If my armorer ever tried to hand me a piece of junk like this I'd do what I did back in the mid-90's, sign out an M60 and a starlight scope and head to the zeroing range. Our troops deserve better equipment than the M16/M4, and we've known that since they went into service in the Vietnam "conflict" - "police action" or whatever they're calling it these days.

  • Steadyeddy

    2/28/2011 10:33:15 PM

    I don't understand what is wrong with not using a DPMS LAR-308, AR-10, both based on the proven design, comes in at 8.1 lbs. and a simple job to convert to burst or auto, why try to design a whole new rifle?

  • B Curtiss

    2/28/2011 9:07:41 PM

    Ok it's a given...our fighters need something more than a .22...but consider the smoothness and modern features of an AR10 .308, or other gas operated auto like an FNAR. I had a .308 M14 for a while and it felt and ran like a 1950's hay baler. We need a 308, but a modern one, not a 50 year old one with a fancy stock. thanks for listening. bdc

  • Cooleemee Edd

    2/28/2011 6:12:53 PM

    I had an M14 in Vietnam and swore by it. I have an M1A now and don't swear anymore, but it is still a fine weapon. Good Going, Army! You've made a good choice and I'm still in good company!!

  • j wads

    2/28/2011 4:45:19 PM

    to RR wake up & smell the coffer, try m1a not m1

  • lst Sgt Mike

    2/28/2011 4:19:05 PM

    Hey, RR, would love to be humpinthe boonies with you, but at 68 they won't let me do it any more.

  • Scotty

    2/28/2011 3:51:59 PM

    The M-14 is the pratical choice for a longer range combat rifle, while the M-16(M-4)is the practical choice for urban CQB. The M-4 is still an fine support rifle in a long range firefight with the M203 grenade launcher a big plus.

  • RR

    2/28/2011 2:21:16 PM

    Please - will you people stop with the "M1" worshiping? With an 8 round capacity and its weight without scope, aiming lights, etc. only a fool would consider issuing it out to our forces. Feel free to come down and trade places - I'll be glad to give you 35 lbs of IOTV, ACH, 280 rds., M9 and ammo, med kit, water, assault pack, etc. and then expect you to hump radio batteries, three days of food, a box of SAW ammo, etc. at 10,000 FT altitude - by all means, let me double the weight of your weapon as well.

  • Thamuz

    2/28/2011 1:44:35 PM

    The M14 was re-issued to fill a void the FN SCAR 17 / Mk17 will now fill.

  • Wiggy

    2/28/2011 1:34:24 PM

    Larry - Unfortunately, a great number of our troops are women and I know very few females that can carry a 14 pound battle rifle, let alone the dozens of extra pounds of ammo, etc. that the M-14 requires. Like it or not, women are becoming a larger component of our non-combat forces and will soon (thanks to President O.)be serving as combat troops as well. I love the M14/M1-A, but it is not realistic to think our current and future average soldier can handle a large battle rifle. The M14 will live on, but it will be in the hands of designated marksman and snipers, who are and will remain to be (for a long time anyway) men.

  • Chuck L

    2/28/2011 1:28:19 PM

    If you really want to reach out and touch someone, an M1 Garand works pretty good. We still have a few of those left too.

  • Larry Johnson

    2/28/2011 1:16:55 PM

    Only a fool would voluntarily go into combat with a .22 rifle. Now get rid of them and equip our forces with competent firearms, including a .45 1911.

  • pki1955

    2/28/2011 1:08:43 PM

    Why is the M14 being utilized when there a plenty of AR .308 Cal. available? Why is not the Army, Marine exploring the 6.8 SPC round in the AR platform?

  • Jim

    2/28/2011 8:31:49 AM

    Using this calber makes a lot more sense then "inventing" another one that is rumored to be halfway between the .223 and the .308.. After all - how many millions of .308 caliber rounds are there in existance, and there is also a plethora of excellent .308 rifles..

  • Jay

    2/28/2011 8:09:08 AM

    Too bad Bill Clinton had thousands of them destroyed to keep us all safe.

  • Steve

    2/28/2011 7:56:08 AM

    Why doesn't the US use the LMT 7.62mm they supply to the British? http://www.janes.com/news/defence/jdw/jdw091229_1_n.shtml

  • Woody

    2/27/2011 8:02:51 PM

    The M-14 is a much more capable rifle, yes it is heavier but the lethality would make the extra weight a moot point...IMO..

  • uzidoit

    2/27/2011 5:46:09 PM

    i see a sage EBR in my future, glad w finally got something under 30 lbs to engage the bad guys at 800 meters effectively

  • bdsoper

    2/27/2011 12:03:28 PM

    Finally.... Thank GOD