Experts in the Field
FacebookTwitter
YouTubeRSS Feed
The .223 Remington

The .223 Remington

The .223 Rem. is a very versatile round with loading options for everything from varmints up to whitetails and even self-defense.

By Richard Mann

  • Comment
  • Send to Friend
  • Share This

8/17/2011

If I could only have a rifle chambered for one cartridge it would be the .223 Remington. With it, I could shoot varmints and deer, I could participate in several forms of competition and just shoot for fun. It has minimal recoil, is affordable to shoot and easy to load for. In addition, it is a cartridge kids take to easily.

The .223 Remington cartridge is the commercial equivalent of the 5.56 X 45 NATO. Some don't understand that from a physical dimension standpoint these cartridges are indeed one in the same. Externally, there is no measurable difference between them. There are, however, two differences in other areas. The first deals with pressure.

Manufacturers load .223 Rem. to 55,000 psi, as established by SAAMI (Sporting Arms & Ammunition Institute). The maximum average pressure for the 5.56 NATO is about 61,600 psi, as established by the U.S. Military. This is 11 percent more than .223 Rem. pressures. Because the 5.56 NATO is a military cartridge, SAAMI hasn’t set pressure limits for it. This is why all handloading data published conforms to SAAMI .223 Rem. pressure limits.

The second difference deals with the way the chamber—more precisely the throat—is cut into the barrel. A barrel chambered for the 5.56 NATO has a longer lead than one chambered for the .223 Rem. This means the distance the rifling begins from the end of the case mouth in a 5.56 chamber is longer than it is in a .223 Rem. chamber. Erring on the side of safety, you can always shoot .223 Rem. ammo in a 5.56 NATO chambered rifle, but should only shoot 5.56 NATO ammo in modern, bolt-action .223 Rem. rifles—never in .223 semi-autos.

The .223 Rem. was actually an experimental cartridge adapted by the U.S. Military in 1964. It was first offered commercially chambered in a Remington model 760 pump-action rifle and announced to the public in December of 1963. It has since become a go-to cartridge for varmint hunters and 3-gun competitors as well as many deer hunters and AR rifle enthusiasts. There is without question more .223 Rem. ammunition fired every year than any other centerfire cartridge.

With 40- to 50-grain varmint bullets, the .223 Rem. is deadly on prairie dogs, ground squirrels and gophers out past 400 yards. For larger vermin like ground hogs and rock chucks, shooting them inside 300 yards provides a lot more bullet upset due to the higher impact velocities. Though some are quick to point out it's not legal everywhere, deer can cleanly and legally be taken with the .223 Rem. in most states. For deer, it’s best to keep shots inside 150 yards so impact velocities are high enough to cause the tough bullets to open wide.

Both my sons and I have taken many deer with the .223 Rem. using bullets like the Nosler 60-grain Partition, the 55-grain Barnes TSX and the 62-grain Fusion. Just last year I participated in a cull hunt where several other writers and I used Dynamic Research Technology's (DRT) 60-grain, powdered-metal bullet to take 22 whitetails with ARs chambered for the .223 Remington. Shots stretched out to 180 yards. We did not lose a single deer, and several of the bucks were near 200 pounds live weight.

On my second trip to Africa I took two rifles; a .300 Win. Mag. and a .223 Remington. I used the .223 to take my favorite African animal, the bushbuck. My PH's 7-year-old son collected a mature warthog with the same rifle. Both of these so called "tough" African animals were put down with a 60-grain Nosler Partition.

Early on, the .223 Rem. was considered a varmint cartridge. Accordingly, most barrels had a slow rifling twist rate of one turn in 12 inches (1 in 12). This worked fine with most common bullets weighing 55 grains or less. As new bullets emerged for the .223 Rem., shooters found the 1 in 12 twist was lacking in its ability to stabilize heavier bullets for good accuracy. In turn, faster twisted barrels for the .223 Rem. became more popular.

Obviously, heavier bullets are longer but the new breed of mono-metal (all copper) bullets are longer still because copper—by volume—weighs less than lead. Then there are the heavy for caliber match bullets, which can be really long. Berger's 75-grain VLD Target bullet is 1.066 inches long compared to Nosler's 40-grain Ballistic Tip bullet, which is almost a half-inch shorter. The Berger requires a minimum twist rate of 1 in 8 while the Nosler will work with twist rates as slow as 1 in 14.

With sporter-style, bolt-action rifles chambered for the .223 Rem., the most common twist rate is 1 in 12. Tactical style bolt action rifles generally have a twist rate of 1 in 9. Some ARs and other .223 Rem. rifles specially designed for target and long range applications have twist rates as fast as 1 in 7. This is very important because the last thing you want to do is find out your new .223 Rem. rifle will not accurately shoot the bullet you want to use.

As a rule of thumb, if the heaviest bullet you will be shooting is 50 grains or less, the 1 in 12 twist should provide good accuracy. If you want to be able to accurately shoot bullets that weigh at least 60 grains, go with the 1 in 9 twist. And finally, if you plan to shoot the really long and heavy bullets, like the Bergers, a twist rate of 1 in 8 or even 1 in 7 is a good idea. For most common use or hunting applications, the 1 in 9 twist is the way to go and will stabilize the light 35- to 40-grain bullets well enough for you to shoot little groups and hit little targets.

As popular as the .223 Rem. is, there are some subtle nuances about the cartridge that not everyone is aware of. Pay attention to twist rate and use robustly constructed bullets if you're after deer-sized game, and if you're handloading, stick with relatively fast powders with burn rates between Alliant's Reloader 7 and Hodgdon's Varget. Alliant also has a new powder called AR Comp, specifically designed for ARs and the .223 Rem.

The .223 Rem. is a great cartridge. If you understand its limitations and versatility it is indeed a great one-gun choice. I know it's what I would choose. If the situation arose where I needed a bigger gun, I'd just borrow one.

Check out the .223 Remington Photo Gallery

  • Comment
  • Send to Friend
  • Share This

Comments

  • John Guzowski

    3/26/2012 10:45:41 PM

    I find the .30-06, .308, 7x57, and 6.5x55 all infinitely more versatile than the .223 Rem [(]5.56 Nato[)].

  • Bill

    1/13/2012 6:44:27 AM

    Seems anytime an article points out the many and varied capabilities of the 5.56/.223 the shoulder cannon guys go nuts about the limitations of the "mouse gun." The author did mention the many capabilities do have limitations. Let's face it, the caliber that is the best for every target at any range from 50 to 1000 yds is very short. In fact, it's blank. I also notice that those who claim the .556 is woefully inadequate in knockdown power volunteer to serve as test dummy to prove their theory. ;-)

  • Rick

    8/25/2011 5:39:22 PM

    I have a Colt AR 15A2, .223, Sporter II. How do I find the twist rate and what weight cartridge will work best for the rifle.

  • Mouser

    8/23/2011 8:33:33 PM

    Can't beat the 6.5 x 55 Swede Mauser for all around. Will accurately take out varmint rats, snakes, opossum, 'coons, coyote, etc. at distance, to game such as deer. Actually, my favorite Deer rifle. Although, .30-'06 is also one of my favorites, I don't see it to be as versatile.

  • Donald Conner

    8/22/2011 10:29:19 PM

    A .30-06 will do anything a mousegun can do, do it better, and farther. Loaded up with 220 grains or 250 grain custom bullets, there is nothing in the Western hemisphere it won't stop. I've got a mousgun too, lot's of goodies on it,and it's fun to play with. In urban warfare it's fine, but as the pro's in the far-off sandboxes have learned, a 7.62x51 is a whole lot better at 600 yards to 1000 yards, and are better stoppers up close. In addition, Mid Tompkins, Nancy Gallager Tompkins, and many others have set world records with the .308 which still stand today. Beware the one gun man is solid truism, but make mine a .30 or bigger. I have yet to see the 5.56AP that will penetrate an engine block of a car, let alone a truck. An'06AP will punch through like Joe Louis landing a Sunday haymaker. 'Nuff said.

  • John

    8/20/2011 9:56:07 PM

    Hard to beat 7.62x39. Cheap powerful reliable.

  • Larry Penn

    8/20/2011 5:55:12 PM

    This is the problem with 223/5.56. The difference is it the chamber and the chamber pressure. That is in the upper not the lower. The chamber is in the upper. The pressure is inside chamber the chamber is in the upper. It does not take brains to buy an AR only money. AR owners are in for a world of hurt for not knowing the facts. Be smart ask your local gunsmith.

  • Jared

    8/19/2011 5:12:25 PM

    Reply to Adam, it doesn't matter what the lower has stamped on it. It's your upper that matters. A lower can have 5.56 stamped on it and you can shoot 6.8 out of it if you have a 6.8 upper. Just because the lower states 5.56 doesn't mean the upper is a 5.56

  • Wizzo

    8/19/2011 5:03:21 PM

    Adam, what is on your lower has jack squat to do with what you can shoot. It's how your chamber is cut that matters. Shooting 5.56 in a .223 chamber can result in excess pressure because the shorter distance to the rifling increases pressures.

  • KDUB

    8/19/2011 12:49:01 PM

    I also agree that the 5.56 and 223 is the best alround tactical caliber round from 50 to 75 grain you cant beat it

  • J. Kou

    8/19/2011 12:15:24 PM

    The .223/5.56 was an unnecessary replacement for the .308/7.62 NATO. .223 is too light, can be deflected by even small twigs or leaves. I definitely, like others before me, prefer a 165-gr .308. Can shoot unto 1000 yards, depending on rifle, and is near impervious to and close range obstacles. As aforementioned, the .308 comes in almost every action invented. Also, you don't get an M1A/M14 or SA58 in .223.

  • CWW

    8/19/2011 11:40:55 AM

    .260 Remington. The most versatile and yet universally disregarded cartridge ever. A shame and complete waste. Does everything a .308 does, only significantly better because of the near ballistic perfection of the 6.5mm bullet. Easily available brass because it is basically a necked down .308. And all this with extremely light recoil. I'll never understand the American shooting public's ambivalence regarding this magnificent all around cartridge.

  • Sam Smith

    8/19/2011 11:00:51 AM

    The most versitle round is the old 30-06 in my opinion. Easy to load, many load components to choose from. Long range capability and accuracy. It can be used on all Texas game animals, including the exocits.

  • Adam

    8/19/2011 10:50:51 AM

    Regarding the part about not shooting a 5.56 round in .223 rifle (except modern bolt-action .223 rifles), you can shoot 5.56 rounds in a AR-15 as long as you have "5.56" stamped on the lower receiver. My Double Star lower is stamped with 5.56 and shoots both .223 and 5.56 (the American Eagle 100 round pack is a great deal) with no problems.

  • Tony

    8/19/2011 9:20:45 AM

    I would have to agree with Guido the 270 in my opinion is a very good all around caliber with that extra punch esp. beyond 150+ yards.