Rifles

The .223 Remington

The .223 Rem. is a very versatile round with loading options for everything from varmints up to whitetails and even self-defense.

8/17/2011

If I could only have a rifle chambered for one cartridge it would be the .223 Remington. With it, I could shoot varmints and deer, I could participate in several forms of competition and just shoot for fun. It has minimal recoil, is affordable to shoot and easy to load for. In addition, it is a cartridge kids take to easily.

The .223 Remington cartridge is the commercial equivalent of the 5.56 X 45 NATO. Some don't understand that from a physical dimension standpoint these cartridges are indeed one in the same. Externally, there is no measurable difference between them. There are, however, two differences in other areas. The first deals with pressure.

Manufacturers load .223 Rem. to 55,000 psi, as established by SAAMI (Sporting Arms & Ammunition Institute). The maximum average pressure for the 5.56 NATO is about 61,600 psi, as established by the U.S. Military. This is 11 percent more than .223 Rem. pressures. Because the 5.56 NATO is a military cartridge, SAAMI hasn’t set pressure limits for it. This is why all handloading data published conforms to SAAMI .223 Rem. pressure limits.

The second difference deals with the way the chamber—more precisely the throat—is cut into the barrel. A barrel chambered for the 5.56 NATO has a longer lead than one chambered for the .223 Rem. This means the distance the rifling begins from the end of the case mouth in a 5.56 chamber is longer than it is in a .223 Rem. chamber. Erring on the side of safety, you can always shoot .223 Rem. ammo in a 5.56 NATO chambered rifle, but should only shoot 5.56 NATO ammo in modern, bolt-action .223 Rem. rifles—never in .223 semi-autos.

The .223 Rem. was actually an experimental cartridge adapted by the U.S. Military in 1964. It was first offered commercially chambered in a Remington model 760 pump-action rifle and announced to the public in December of 1963. It has since become a go-to cartridge for varmint hunters and 3-gun competitors as well as many deer hunters and AR rifle enthusiasts. There is without question more .223 Rem. ammunition fired every year than any other centerfire cartridge.

With 40- to 50-grain varmint bullets, the .223 Rem. is deadly on prairie dogs, ground squirrels and gophers out past 400 yards. For larger vermin like ground hogs and rock chucks, shooting them inside 300 yards provides a lot more bullet upset due to the higher impact velocities. Though some are quick to point out it's not legal everywhere, deer can cleanly and legally be taken with the .223 Rem. in most states. For deer, it’s best to keep shots inside 150 yards so impact velocities are high enough to cause the tough bullets to open wide.

Both my sons and I have taken many deer with the .223 Rem. using bullets like the Nosler 60-grain Partition, the 55-grain Barnes TSX and the 62-grain Fusion. Just last year I participated in a cull hunt where several other writers and I used Dynamic Research Technology's (DRT) 60-grain, powdered-metal bullet to take 22 whitetails with ARs chambered for the .223 Remington. Shots stretched out to 180 yards. We did not lose a single deer, and several of the bucks were near 200 pounds live weight.

On my second trip to Africa I took two rifles; a .300 Win. Mag. and a .223 Remington. I used the .223 to take my favorite African animal, the bushbuck. My PH's 7-year-old son collected a mature warthog with the same rifle. Both of these so called "tough" African animals were put down with a 60-grain Nosler Partition.

Early on, the .223 Rem. was considered a varmint cartridge. Accordingly, most barrels had a slow rifling twist rate of one turn in 12 inches (1 in 12). This worked fine with most common bullets weighing 55 grains or less. As new bullets emerged for the .223 Rem., shooters found the 1 in 12 twist was lacking in its ability to stabilize heavier bullets for good accuracy. In turn, faster twisted barrels for the .223 Rem. became more popular.

Obviously, heavier bullets are longer but the new breed of mono-metal (all copper) bullets are longer still because copper—by volume—weighs less than lead. Then there are the heavy for caliber match bullets, which can be really long. Berger's 75-grain VLD Target bullet is 1.066 inches long compared to Nosler's 40-grain Ballistic Tip bullet, which is almost a half-inch shorter. The Berger requires a minimum twist rate of 1 in 8 while the Nosler will work with twist rates as slow as 1 in 14.

With sporter-style, bolt-action rifles chambered for the .223 Rem., the most common twist rate is 1 in 12. Tactical style bolt action rifles generally have a twist rate of 1 in 9. Some ARs and other .223 Rem. rifles specially designed for target and long range applications have twist rates as fast as 1 in 7. This is very important because the last thing you want to do is find out your new .223 Rem. rifle will not accurately shoot the bullet you want to use.

As a rule of thumb, if the heaviest bullet you will be shooting is 50 grains or less, the 1 in 12 twist should provide good accuracy. If you want to be able to accurately shoot bullets that weigh at least 60 grains, go with the 1 in 9 twist. And finally, if you plan to shoot the really long and heavy bullets, like the Bergers, a twist rate of 1 in 8 or even 1 in 7 is a good idea. For most common use or hunting applications, the 1 in 9 twist is the way to go and will stabilize the light 35- to 40-grain bullets well enough for you to shoot little groups and hit little targets.

As popular as the .223 Rem. is, there are some subtle nuances about the cartridge that not everyone is aware of. Pay attention to twist rate and use robustly constructed bullets if you're after deer-sized game, and if you're handloading, stick with relatively fast powders with burn rates between Alliant's Reloader 7 and Hodgdon's Varget. Alliant also has a new powder called AR Comp, specifically designed for ARs and the .223 Rem.

The .223 Rem. is a great cartridge. If you understand its limitations and versatility it is indeed a great one-gun choice. I know it's what I would choose. If the situation arose where I needed a bigger gun, I'd just borrow one.

Check out the .223 Remington Photo Gallery

Share |

Comments

ADD YOUR COMMENT

Enter your comments below, they will appear within 24 hours


Your Name


Your Email


Your Comment

58 Responses to The .223 Remington

John Guzowski wrote:
March 26, 2012

I find the .30-06, .308, 7x57, and 6.5x55 all infinitely more versatile than the .223 Rem (5.56 Nato).

Bill wrote:
January 13, 2012

Seems anytime an article points out the many and varied capabilities of the 5.56/.223 the shoulder cannon guys go nuts about the limitations of the "mouse gun." The author did mention the many capabilities do have limitations. Let's face it, the caliber that is the best for every target at any range from 50 to 1000 yds is very short. In fact, it's blank. I also notice that those who claim the .556 is woefully inadequate in knockdown power volunteer to serve as test dummy to prove their theory. ;-)

Rick wrote:
August 25, 2011

I have a Colt AR 15A2, .223, Sporter II. How do I find the twist rate and what weight cartridge will work best for the rifle.

Mouser wrote:
August 23, 2011

Can't beat the 6.5 x 55 Swede Mauser for all around. Will accurately take out varmint rats, snakes, opossum, 'coons, coyote, etc. at distance, to game such as deer. Actually, my favorite Deer rifle. Although, .30-'06 is also one of my favorites, I don't see it to be as versatile.

Donald Conner wrote:
August 22, 2011

A .30-06 will do anything a mousegun can do, do it better, and farther. Loaded up with 220 grains or 250 grain custom bullets, there is nothing in the Western hemisphere it won't stop. I've got a mousgun too, lot's of goodies on it,and it's fun to play with. In urban warfare it's fine, but as the pro's in the far-off sandboxes have learned, a 7.62x51 is a whole lot better at 600 yards to 1000 yards, and are better stoppers up close. In addition, Mid Tompkins, Nancy Gallager Tompkins, and many others have set world records with the .308 which still stand today. Beware the one gun man is solid truism, but make mine a .30 or bigger. I have yet to see the 5.56AP that will penetrate an engine block of a car, let alone a truck. An'06AP will punch through like Joe Louis landing a Sunday haymaker. 'Nuff said.

John wrote:
August 20, 2011

Hard to beat 7.62x39. Cheap powerful reliable.

Larry Penn wrote:
August 20, 2011

This is the problem with 223/5.56. The difference is it the chamber and the chamber pressure. That is in the upper not the lower. The chamber is in the upper. The pressure is inside chamber the chamber is in the upper. It does not take brains to buy an AR only money. AR owners are in for a world of hurt for not knowing the facts. Be smart ask your local gunsmith.

Jared wrote:
August 19, 2011

Reply to Adam, it doesn't matter what the lower has stamped on it. It's your upper that matters. A lower can have 5.56 stamped on it and you can shoot 6.8 out of it if you have a 6.8 upper. Just because the lower states 5.56 doesn't mean the upper is a 5.56

Wizzo wrote:
August 19, 2011

Adam, what is on your lower has jack squat to do with what you can shoot. It's how your chamber is cut that matters. Shooting 5.56 in a .223 chamber can result in excess pressure because the shorter distance to the rifling increases pressures.

KDUB wrote:
August 19, 2011

I also agree that the 5.56 and 223 is the best alround tactical caliber round from 50 to 75 grain you cant beat it

J. Kou wrote:
August 19, 2011

The .223/5.56 was an unnecessary replacement for the .308/7.62 NATO. .223 is too light, can be deflected by even small twigs or leaves. I definitely, like others before me, prefer a 165-gr .308. Can shoot unto 1000 yards, depending on rifle, and is near impervious to and close range obstacles. As aforementioned, the .308 comes in almost every action invented. Also, you don't get an M1A/M14 or SA58 in .223.

CWW wrote:
August 19, 2011

.260 Remington. The most versatile and yet universally disregarded cartridge ever. A shame and complete waste. Does everything a .308 does, only significantly better because of the near ballistic perfection of the 6.5mm bullet. Easily available brass because it is basically a necked down .308. And all this with extremely light recoil. I'll never understand the American shooting public's ambivalence regarding this magnificent all around cartridge.

Sam Smith wrote:
August 19, 2011

The most versitle round is the old 30-06 in my opinion. Easy to load, many load components to choose from. Long range capability and accuracy. It can be used on all Texas game animals, including the exocits.

Adam wrote:
August 19, 2011

Regarding the part about not shooting a 5.56 round in .223 rifle (except modern bolt-action .223 rifles), you can shoot 5.56 rounds in a AR-15 as long as you have "5.56" stamped on the lower receiver. My Double Star lower is stamped with 5.56 and shoots both .223 and 5.56 (the American Eagle 100 round pack is a great deal) with no problems.

Tony wrote:
August 19, 2011

I would have to agree with Guido the 270 in my opinion is a very good all around caliber with that extra punch esp. beyond 150+ yards.

Bob M wrote:
August 19, 2011

Strongly prefer 25-06 factory loads or 7mm Rem Mag with 125 gr soft nose charged for target use. With the latter, I can go up or down as the situation dictates. there

dave wrote:
August 19, 2011

had to beat a 7mm rem mag

Larry Penn wrote:
August 19, 2011

I load Barnes solids in my 6.8mm SPC Better than AP's. Silver State Ammo make some nice 6.8mm SPC specII rounds. Yes, there are spec I&II chambers for the 6.8mm. What do yo have??

Kevin wrote:
August 19, 2011

Call me old school but I still favor the 30-06 as best all around round.

Dennis wrote:
August 19, 2011

There is no doubt the .223 is a great caliber and has many uses. It is also relatively inexpensive to shoot. However, I believe the .243 is a better all-around cartridge. It is certainly accurate enough for varmints and is a better deer caliber, with greater knock-down power and more margin for error (as in quick shots) I believe it is also legal everywhere.

Ray wrote:
August 19, 2011

I belive that the 6.5 would have been a better round for the military instead of the 5.56 or the .223. Politicains are the people who dictate what,why,where and who the benifactors well be.Its to bad that our country runs on politicans pockets and not on the peoples needs.

Dale Bailey wrote:
August 19, 2011

One size fits all!Yeah right. "Fast and Furious" Is a successful program of controlling gun smuggling to drug cartels too,I guess. The .223 is...was.. and will always be... a great varmint round.

Jon Weiss wrote:
August 18, 2011

Oregon used to have the state hunting reg that allowed deer hunting with the .223 Rem provided that the round used was loaded to a point of developing at least 900ft/lbs of energy at 100 yards. I used them quite effectively for hunting white tails in Western Oregon. It is indeed a good and effective round.

Gordon wrote:
August 18, 2011

My choice is the 7X57 Mauser cartridge. The .223 is not legal for deer in this State anyhow. I guess it's all right for coyote and small game, like rabbit.

JW wrote:
August 18, 2011

i have witinesed a 223 go end over end.I carried a m16 in Vietnam and i have seen it on paper....just a thought.

Lawrence Moore wrote:
August 18, 2011

.308 Would be my choice. Handload mild with 100 grain or hot with 180 grain or buy with 110-200 grain. All types of firearms are chambered for .308 - lever, bolt, pump, handgun (bolt), single shot, drilling, semi-auto.

Guido wrote:
August 18, 2011

I do not disagree with this, however, for myself, I would have to choose the .270 caliber. It has virtually all the attributes given to the .223, plus more profound punch, range, and versatility!

Jim Mosher wrote:
August 18, 2011

Interesting article. Regarding .223 Remington use in semi-autos, AR-15/M-4 models and Ruger Mini-14s are throated for 5.56mm NATO. My Mini-14 Ranch Rifle easily digests 5.56mm.

Rand K wrote:
August 18, 2011

If I only had one rifle, it would be a .30-30. Buy ammo anywhere, shoot anything, always goes bang, no magazine to lose or jam. Cheap, reliable and functional.

david case wrote:
August 18, 2011

.30 cal

Meindert Z. wrote:
August 18, 2011

I love the .223 but it would not be my one gun choice. I would go with the 6.5x55 Swedish Mauser round.Not well known in the States but large enough to do all the above except some of the large animals in the African savanna, although even the writer admits he took a .300 Win mag along with him to Africa. Good idea with all those dangerous predators, elephants, rhinos, and water buffalo around. A .223 would be suicidal, even against an American grizzly, moose or polar bear. Of course, if you stay local, at least in Southern California, the .223 will keep the local predators at bay, both the two and four legged variety.:) Cheers!!!

Robert Munsey wrote:
August 18, 2011

Good article. Much info new to me. I have a Savage 222 rechambered to 223 and have used it for deer, with fine success. I really like it. I have saved the story in print.

Don Crawford wrote:
August 18, 2011

While the .223 is a fine round (I have multiple rifles chambered in this caliber), my own choice for one cartridge would be the .308 Winchester. With outstanding performance in all mentioned fields, along with much better terminal ballistics than the .223--especially on larger game--and being available in any action type that suits you, it should be a serious contender for the "one round".

T L Wier wrote:
August 18, 2011

223 may be all that, but the one gun is the 308. With it you would never have to borrow another gun and could take every critter in North America. The 223 is too wind sensitive and too light to be my one gun.

Dennis Larson wrote:
August 18, 2011

I agree that the 5.56/.223 is a good comprimise bullet but I would definitely go with the 1 in 7 twist rate to be able to use the heavier weight to give it more energy on target for self defense and hunting bigger game.

Frank Garfield wrote:
August 18, 2011

The .223 might do in some cases but stay out of Alaska because you might run into a big brown bear and wish you had nothing less than a .338 magnum

Richard S wrote:
August 18, 2011

Been in the miltary and a civilian Police agency as well as a handloader for bench and varmint. I Respect the .223 but think Remington nailed it with their 6.8 SPC. a .270 bullet traveling at 2600+fps carrying 110 grains of weight. The round has more punch at 200 yards than the .223 at the muzzle, only a modest increase in recoil. This cartridge is also big game legal in almost all game jurisdictions. The whole package also fits nicely in the Bushmaster M-4 carbine. Ask some of the returning troops from the middle east. The enemy became aloof when they thought that they were being shot at with a 5.56(.223) until the round blasted thru cement block walls from 300 yds. away and sent them to their awaiting "virgins".

Rick wrote:
August 18, 2011

.308, enough said.

Leslie Hall wrote:
August 18, 2011

If I had only one Rifle it would be in .270 Win.

Thomas L. Allen wrote:
August 18, 2011

WHOOOOOP! HA-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha. No, wait--you're not really serious? The .223? Ridiculous.

Retired military wrote:
August 18, 2011

Yes ! by all means the 223. I wish I had the financial resources to afford a 223 and 10k rounds of ammo. I really miss that sweet M16A2

Andrew wrote:
August 18, 2011

Seen too many deer run away after being hit by a .223 and other .22 CF rounds so I say baloney. I would go with a the 30-06 delivered via my Garand.

van wrote:
August 18, 2011

Ummmm. I hate this caliber personally. Its a rocket propelled .22, get a .308 if you want versatility

Larry Penn wrote:
August 18, 2011

Nice job on 223 and 5.56 but 5.56 NATO have harden primers. I would never shoot 223's in an AR because the AR has a floating firing pin. The primers in 223's use soft primers that will cause a slamfire. I use CCI No.41 primers in all my 5.56 NATO handloads.

Gman wrote:
August 18, 2011

I like the .223 and enjoy running several mags thru my Ruger SR556. I don't hunt deer with it and have no dought that it can't take one down. I have a .270 WIN. for that. If I had only one cartridge to have, I would choose the .243 caliber for my all around rifle. I have seen deer easily downed at 250+yds. and bob cats shot at close range and not tear the animal up for great looking mounts. Recoil is minimal like the .223 with a little heavier bullet weight than the .223. With a fine scope and rifle set up, I don't think you can beat a .243 shooting deer to varmints.

Charles G Miller wrote:
August 18, 2011

I find this article well thought out. However, I have a different preference based on my experience in Vietnam. I find the .223 to have no shock effect under 100 yards. It seems to have no punch and be easily deflected beyond 250 yards. I prefer the .308 or .338 which is effective out to 1000 yards and very useful to 500. Little hunting is done at those ranges but I want that ability in my bag of tricks. Cpt., US Army, Americal, Vietnam.

rick wrote:
August 18, 2011

borrow one? more like take out the'zombie'then procure his AK hah;)

Bob wrote:
August 18, 2011

While the,223 is a fine cartridge, my preference is the good old .30-06. 110gr to 220 gr bullets and velocities of a wide range that allow little kids to big kids to enjoy. It has served me well since the 1950's. A good all around cartridge even after all these years!

Grant wrote:
August 18, 2011

I have a 223 & shoot it a lot & enjoy it. As for deer in our area it is not enough for a lot of the ranges we shoot in open fields. It is also not a legal deer rifle here in Ks. Anything much less than deer is is very adequate & a lot of fun to shoot. I handload for mine & use Hornady 50 grain bullets for impressive kills on coyotes & crows. Back to deer, I enjoy shooting my 300 Win. Mag. loaded w/ 150 grain bullets on 400+ yd. deer shots across open fields.

john B 223 wrote:
August 18, 2011

A million kudos to Mr Mann for his fantastic article on the 223 Rem. Since Vietnam,I have favored this caliber above all others(30-06 and 308 are close seconds).The USAF was the first to adopt the M16 and that's what I carried when I was attached to the 1st Cav in'Nam in 68/69. Since then,the 223 Rem has been my first coice above all other calibers.

HeyWino wrote:
August 18, 2011

.260 Remington. Ballistically perfect and with a variety of bullet weights is fully capable of taking any animal in NA at long distances with virtually no recoil.

kmohror wrote:
August 18, 2011

It would have to be the .308. soft shooting, hard hitting and available just about any place. It takes small game to elk.

Miguel wrote:
August 18, 2011

Personally I like the 7.62mm NATO because it will do everything the .223in or 5.56mm can do and has a bigger punch and range beyond 400yds.

Dale Gant wrote:
August 18, 2011

I have a Ruger Mini-14 and am very fond of the rifle and the .223 round as well. But if pressed to have only one caliber, I may go with the .257 as I own one and it is more effective for deer size game.

Dale Johnson wrote:
August 18, 2011

My one caliber would be a 25-08. Have had one for years and it stops anything I've shot at. A lot of flex in reloading depending on what you need to stop. Uses 308 cases which there are billions of floating around. We are doing a disservice to our troops by sticking them with it.

Bill Miller wrote:
August 18, 2011

While I've long been a fan of the .223 Rem / 5.56x45 NATO cartridge, if I could have only one rifle chambered in one caliber it would be in 6.5 Grendel. While the 5.56 is effective out to 300m (from a 20" barrel), the Grendel exceeds even 7.62 NATO out at 500m and beyond.

Marshall Burp wrote:
August 18, 2011

.223 without a doubt.

Dave wrote:
August 18, 2011

Like the .308 Win... better versatility....Ultimate survival gun though is the 12 gauge shotgun