Can't wait to someday own one. I love all my Ruger firearms I have so far and I bet this wouldn't be an exception.
David wrote: December 02, 2013
Shot mine for the first time yesterday, love it! With a new trigger I was very impressed with the accuracy!
Constance wrote: December 02, 2013
Thu would have been a great birthday present
Robert East wrote: December 01, 2013
FYI, one M.O.A. refers to One Minute of ARC not one minute of angle. At 100 yards it equals approximately 1 inch.
Larry Nutter wrote: December 01, 2013
Wish list: SR-762 Rifle in .260 Remington with a 20' barrel. This is the chambering the military should be using. The 6.5mm has been battle tested for 100 years. Less recoil, much higher ballistic coefficient, more down range energy, better accuracy. FMJ military ammo is still a man stopper.
Frank wrote: December 01, 2013
I purchased my SR 7.62 last month and am very pleased with the firearms performance shooting Winchester 147 grain .308 rounds. The Carbine's Iron Sights are perfect for 100 - 200 yards and the firearm has very little recoil. It feeds ammo and extracts empty casings in a heart beat. Nice balance and easy to clean. I'm satisfied.
Bill wrote: December 01, 2013
I wish 2 things, One, is that I had this in Viet Nam instead of the M-16. Two, that I had enough money to afford one now. I'd love to own one of these. I'd probably retire my old 8mm Mauser for deer hunting and use this fine rifle.
jim wrote: December 01, 2013
When will they have a version that can be bought in Colorado, since Hickenlooper banned large capacity magazines
DutchUncle wrote: December 01, 2013
I NEVER could understand why they chambered a .223 (5.56) in the original M-16. I had NO knock down and the range sucked. Granted the recoil was light but so was the impact while our troops,,myself included, face the 308 (7.62) AK-47 from which there was NO hiding. But then again, it was selected by people who would NOT have to use it in battle to defend themselves either...Typical Gov't buy. I would loved to have seen a .243,,now THAT is a round.
Jake wrote: December 01, 2013
I have had one for a week just won't shoot with my FN-AR has a long way to go it has be weighed measured and found wanting
Barry Simmons wrote: December 01, 2013
How about a decent single shot version for us poor old Brits!
Mark Priebe wrote: December 01, 2013
Nice looking specs look forward to get one in my hands
Greg Pitts wrote: December 01, 2013
With a suggested retail at $2,000+ they can keep it. I wouldn't give $600.
Mark wrote: December 01, 2013
Based on the comments so far, there are a lot of Dumb people out there. Good job Ruger on a good rifle. The s&w m&p10 is still going to be tough to beat though
Jim g wrote: November 30, 2013
I realize it has a factory trigger, but groups over 1 inch+ are not something I'm looking for.
jeff rogers wrote: November 28, 2013
I picked this up this week from my local shop 1,795. It felt extremely nice with little recoil, I am very plesed with my purchase and am confident that any one purchasing will be happy.
Ce`arr wrote: November 26, 2013
7/08, 6.5 Lapua, 6.5.Grendel, - of all the things that could stoke an FN inColt's clothing - honestly you Yanks are so set on justifying the mistakes of yesterday you're a curse to the future.
hunter wrote: November 26, 2013
A longer barrel and 243 260 358 options would be nice
R6600DH wrote: November 26, 2013
This seems like a lot of money for a rifle that will not change to a 5.56 NATO upper. Granted it is a piston upper vs a DGI but it looks like my Colt LE901 with adapter is a better buy for the money.
emkay wrote: November 26, 2013
Talyn, why would you want a 20 foot barrel???
LongbowTap wrote: November 26, 2013
I just received two of these rifles and am very pleased that it is compatible with both the .308 and the 7.62 chamber pressures. I also plan using the Nikon M-308 scope on it. Put the M-223 scope on the SR-556 and it is an excellent combination. Ruger really came through with the piston rifles - much better than the early M-16s we used in the mid-60s.
Talyn wrote: November 26, 2013
Would like to see a 20' barrel version.
7sniper3 wrote: November 26, 2013
Have a M1A, yes it's heavy but gadgets won't win it. Good for you AR guys to get a better round.
normmm wrote: November 26, 2013
accuracy looks good but would be interesting to have the velocities also since it's such a short barrel
Mike Nelson wrote: November 26, 2013
Thank you Ruger!
I've been waiting for this for YEARS!
Bob E wrote: November 25, 2013
I've owned numerous Ruger rifles and all were excellent. This one should just good as always.
Bob E.
Comments
ADD YOUR COMMENT
Enter your comments below, they will appear within 24 hours
26 Responses to Ruger SR-762 Rifle (Page 2)