Handguns > Historical

Dirty Harry's Model 29: America's Shooting Star (Page 2)

Out of production and somewhat obscure, the Smith & Wesson Model 29 was once well known only to serious big-bore handgunners. Then in 1971, it became one of the most famous and desirable handguns of all time. Do you know why? Well, do ya?

Leading the crusade for a “.44 Special Magnum,” as he called it, Keith proceeded to blow up numerous revolvers until at last he had the cartridge he wanted. He convinced Remington to manufacture it, but not before lengthening the .44 Spl. case one-tenth of an inch, to keep others from duplicating Keith’s cylinder-exploding exploits. The result was the .44 Rem. Mag. cartridge, which fired a 240-grain Keith-designed bullet at 1,400 fps. At 50 yards, it hit with more than 750 ft.-lbs. of energy, almost double that of the .357 Mag. cartridge.

All that was needed was a handgun capable of handling the cartridge. For that, S&W turned to its S-frame Triple Lock, which by then had evolved into the Hand Ejector Fourth Model, better known as the 1950 Target Model in .44 Spl. (later to become the Model 24) and the 1955 Target Model (basically the same gun but in .45 caliber and with a heavier barrel; later it became the Model 25). But first some tweaking had to be done, which included lengthening the cylinder to close up the barrel-cylinder gap and incorporating recessed chambers. When completed, the gun weighed 48 ounces, which helped tame the recoil. As that was before S&W started incorporating model numbers for its handguns, the behemoth six-shot revolver was simply called the “.44 Magnum,” which was rollmarked along the right side of the barrel.

“The first .44 Magnum built was in December 1955,” notes Jinks. “The serial numbers started at S131700 and were mixed up in the early production with some of the early production guns having serial numbers as high as S167124. The reason for this was that the factory was using frames that had already been built, but were for the .45 Target Model of 1955. That frame was already set up for the heavy barrel that was going on the .44 Magnums.”

On Dec. 29, .44 Magnum number S130806, the second gun to be produced, was presented to R.H. Coleman of Remington Arms Co. On Jan. 19, 1956, the revolver was officially announced to the public. The initial price was $135, but was almost immediately raised to $140. The gun was housed in a satin-lined black wooden case embossed with “.44 Magnum” and the S&W logo on the lid. Inside were a screwdriver, cleaning rod, and wire brush and cotton swab attachments. The .44 Magnum was available in either a 4-inch or 6½-inch barrel, fitted with Goncala Alves target stocks, and came in blue or nickel finish, with case hardened hammer and trigger and Micro Adjustable sights.

Of the guns produced in January 1956, serial number S147220, went to Keith and number S130942 was shipped to Maj. Gen. Julian S. Hatcher, Technical Editor of The American Rifleman. Other notable gunwriters also received 6½-inch-barreled versions. Hatcher’s review of the .44 Magnum appeared in this magazine’s March 1956 issue. Needless to say, the gun was an instant success, with about 3,100 made that year. The .44 Magnum appealed to hunters impressed with Keith’s tales of long-range kills made with it. The law enforcement community was equally enamored with the .44 Magnum’s potential for stopping cars at substantially closer distances. It soon became apparent, however, that shooting such a heavy-recoiling handgun wasn’t something to do for any length of time. Stoking it with milder .44 Spl. Loads—which also chambered in the .44 Magnum—soon became de rigueur.

I succumbed to Model 29 fever in 1979. Until then, as a gunwriter just starting out penning articles for this magazine and others, I couldn’t afford the inflated Model 29 prices. But that year, Abercrombie & Fitch, then a true outdoor outfitter, was opening a store in Beverly Hills and had an allocation of three Model 29s—one in each barrel length. And they were going to be sold at retail price, which at that time had climbed to $354.50, with the 83⁄8-inch barrel (which always brought a premium) at $366. When A&F’s doors opened that first day I sprinted up the steps two at a time to the mezzanine where the gun department was located and slapped my money down for the 83⁄8-inch model.

I still have it, along with a few others, including a 6½-inch version shipped as a test gun in 1957 to an unidentified gunwriter in New York who marked the frame with his distinctive six-dot punch pattern. He had fired so many full-house loads through it that I had to have the barrel turned back to 6¼ inches to reduce the cylinder gap.

Interestingly, the earliest guns had right-hand threads on the ejector rod screw, which caused it to back out and jam due to recoil. From Model variation 29-1 on, that was changed to left-hand threads, solving the problem. Reflecting a change in designation throughout the Smith & Wesson line, in late 1957, starting with serial number S179000, the .44 Magnum became the Model 29. As Jinks notes, however, the changeover was sporadic, and between 1957 and 1958 guns marked both .44 Magnum and Model 29 were shipped concurrently.

The 83⁄8-inch barrel was added in November 1958 and the black wooden case was changed to mahogany in 1960. The Gun Control Act of 1968 resulted in the S-frame designation being changed to an N-frame prefix, and in 1979 the 6½-inch barrel was shortened to 6 inches in order to standardize production, according to Jinks, who actually suggested the change. In 1981, the counterbored cylinder chambers and pinned barrel were eliminated as both were unnecessary. Later, the pivoting, hammer-mounted firing pin was changed to a frame-mounted version. Other internal modifications continued through the 1990s, including improved yoke retention and longer cylinder locking bolts.

Externally the Model 29 received many makeovers, including Model 629 stainless steel versions and Performance Center specials, plus barrel lengths ranging from an exclusive three-incher for distributor Lew Horton to a 105⁄8-inch factory Silhouette model. In addition, in chronological order, there were five-, four-, and three-screw models. In 1999 the Model 29 was discontinued, but, in 2006 it was brought back as a 50th Anniversary Commemorative (technically missing it by a year) with a 6½-inch barrel and engraved gold medallion on the frame. Today the Model 29 is still available as a limited-production Classic Model in nickel or blued finish (albeit with a key lock on the left side plate) with a 4- or 6½-inch barrel. Plus, handsome laser-etched versions of the gun were introduced in 2009 and 2010. Unfortunately, according to Paul Pluff, S&W’s director of marketing/customer service, “We do not have any new Model 29s that have been recently or [are] going to be released.”

Whether or not that situation continues remains to be seen. After all, in a 2008 survey, 20th Century Fox asked moviegoers to name their favorite on-screen arms. The Model 29 came in second only to Luke Skywalker’s lightsaber. Frankly, I’d take the Model 29 over the lightsaber any day. It has far greater range and doesn’t need special effects to make it work. I kind of think Dirty Harry would agree.

<< PREV   1   2  

Share |

Comments

ADD YOUR COMMENT

Enter your comments below, they will appear within 24 hours


Your Name


Your Email


Your Comment

12 Responses to Dirty Harry's Model 29: America's Shooting Star (Page 2)

Bernardo wrote:
August 25, 2013

I just got a s&w model 29-1 just curious what are they goin for? Its on original box

Bill Sparks wrote:
August 03, 2013

Hello: I have 2 Smith Wesson model 29-2 one in the 6 1/2' barrel and one in the 8 3/8' barrel with all of the paper work and box for each. I have fired both at the range using the .44 mag 240 Gr with no problem in recoil. The 1/2' extra on the 6 1/2' makes a big difference in the recoil. Then using the .44 special; give me the .44 mag 240 gr anytime. I also have the Smith Wesson model 27-2 in the 8 3/8 barrel chamber in the .357 mag but the .44 mag tops them all.

frank Hodge II wrote:
July 31, 2013

Just got S&W Dirty Harry,44, With 8 3/8 to go with my 357, 686, and my favorite S&W 41magnum with 8 3/8 barrel. Goin to my grand children one day.

Chris wrote:
July 31, 2013

My wife gave me a 629 for our 3rd anniversary ... what a woman! What a gun! Used it to take a nice 8pt buck that year. Easily kept 6 shots on a paper plate at 100 yards from 'field' rest. Helluva 'pillow talk' when I had to camp out in our business to prevent further looters following Hurricane Gustav.

Jay wrote:
July 31, 2013

I have a Model 29-3 with the 8 3/8 barrel,after shooting my brother's 29-2 with the 6 incher I had to have one.I only shoot factory loads and I haven't had any problems with it.I always read how bad the recoil is and I think after owning and shooting model 29's I think the recoil is exaggerated.Yes there is recoil,but if you death grip it you will feel it,I allow mine to rock a little,adding different grips helps too. I have no problem shooting it at the range,usually 50 rounds at a time alternating back and forth with my other hand guns.

Mike Hargreaves wrote:
July 30, 2013

Back in 1968 we (family of 4) moved from Australia to Toronto Canada (we originally hailed from Liverpool UK) my second job was a small engineering Company, as a purchasing agent. The storekeeper, Fred, was a 'Gun Nut' as we say, talked a mile a minute, you had trouble getting a word in edgeways. Fred invited me to his indoor gun club (Canada cold) he had brought a pair of safety glasses, and ear muffs for me. First order of the day, safety lecture, well covered by Fred. Bulls eye target sent down to 20yds, mod 29, 4'? in its wooden box came out, big crouch, 5 rounds of reloads (Mild) rapid fired double action sent after the target, one hit. That would keep their heads down said Fred. I had never mentioned I had been shooting pistols/revolvers, since I was 17. 'Your turn' said Fred. I asked him if he minded if I 'Dry fired his 29' I got an old fashioned look! One hand, target stance, cocked hammer with left hand, 5 carful shots! a big ragged hole, not in the middle, would have needed to have adjusted the sights, not my gun. No comment, packed up gear, no word spoken! Off to Tim Horton's, coffee shop. 'Why didn't you tell me you could shoot like this' wagging the target at me. 'You never gave me a chance' said I. Fred told that story often!

Jerry in Arizona wrote:
July 30, 2013

This is an excellent article. Very interesting and informative. I've wanted a model 29 for many years, preceding Dirty Harry. Finally invested in a 4' 29-3 about six months ago. The first six rounds out of it made a 1/2 dollar size hole at 15 yards. Wish I had jumped in years ago.

petru sova wrote:
July 30, 2013

The Model 29 had many problems as it was not designed to handle the recoil of the .44 magnum cartridge. It soon shot loose with a steady diet of heavy loads. I bought one many years ago and the recoil of even moderately heavy loads soon peened back the extractor rod putting a mushroom on the tip of it. This 'N' frame gun was designed for the much more anemic .44 special cartridge and the recoil of the .44 Mag was just too much for this gun. The crudely made cast iron Ruger double action .44 mag was and is actually the more rugged gun but it did not have the workmanship of the older Smith model 29's. The 29 survives as the 629 stainless version but it is now made with unreliable junk MIM cast parts that are known for high failure rates. Think of that before you buy one for a trail bear protection gun.

John wrote:
July 24, 2013

S frame? I could find nothing in the Std Catalog of S&W by Supica&Nahas about an S frame. I have an old 2d Model HE and thought it to be an N frame. I thought all M-29s were N frame as well.

MikeyO wrote:
July 24, 2013

Bought my 29-3, 8.3' barrel in the 80's. Still my favorite. Downloaded with 11gr Unique with 210gr XTP. If I just had to make one critical shot with a handgun, this is it.

larryashackleford wrote:
July 24, 2013

got two model 29's love them both

Tim Markham wrote:
July 23, 2013

Serial number N312190. I didn't NEED this revolver, but a sense that pride of ownership would prevail, led me to this handgun. And I'm glad that it did.