Rifles > Semi-Auto

Safety Advisory for .17 HMR Semi-Autos

Ammunition manufacturers caution that the .17 HMR is unsafe for use in semi-auto firearms.

Major ammunition manufacturers have issued safety notices concerning the use of .17 HMR ammunition in semi-auto firearms. According to the manufacturers, firing .17 HMR ammo in semi-auto firearms could result in property damage or serious personal injury and should be immediately discontinued.


CCI, Federal, Hornady, Remington and Winchester have all issued statements warning consumers not to use .17 HMR ammunition in semi-auto firearms until contacting the manufacturer to determine if the specific type of firearm is safe to handle .17 HMR ammunition.


Press releases concerning the safety notices state: "17 HMR ammunition is manufactured in accordance with standards issued by the Sporting Arms and Ammunition Manufacturers' Institute (SAAMI). Subsequent to the design and introduction of 17 HMR ammunition in the market, 17 HMR semi-automatic firearms were introduced by various firearm manufacturers. Those firearms have proven to be incompatible with 17 HMR ammunition. 17 HMR ammunition is suitable for use in quality firearms in good condition that are not semi-automatic."


Remington has issued a recall of its .17 HMR ammunition, as well as its Model 597 .17 HMR semi-auto rifle as there is no safe .17 HMR ammunition available for the rifle.


Remington is providing free shipping to return Model 597 .17 HMR semi-auto rifles to Remington along with coupons to replace the rifle with another Remington firearm. Consumers will receive a $200 coupon for synthetic stock Model 597 rifles, and a $250 coupon for laminate stock Model 597 rifles.


Remington is also providing $10 coupons to purchase Remington ammunition for every 50 round box of Remington .17 HMR ammunition returned to Remington.


For instructions on returning a Remington Model 597 .17 HMR semi-auto rifle or .17 HMR ammunition, contact the Remington Consumer Service Department at (800) 243-9700, prompt No. 3.


Share |

Comments

ADD YOUR COMMENT

Enter your comments below, they will appear within 24 hours


Your Name


Your Email


Your Comment

34 Responses to Safety Advisory for .17 HMR Semi-Autos

Russ wrote:
July 15, 2013

"Bought a 770 because gander couldn't release my Ruger GScout in time for my flight out to hunt even though it was a week later and the stupid 5 day rule here in PB County..." Why would anyone try to buy the rifle for their hunt only 5 days before the hunt?

Russ wrote:
July 15, 2013

Why would anyone try to buy the rifle for their hunt only 5 days before the hunt?

harold wrote:
March 20, 2013

I have a savage 17 hmr I have killed at the least 30 squirrels at 50 to 75 yards the basest rifle I own by far set my scope at 100 on a dime never failed me yet Go savage please don't sell out to Chine endless I'm to late an take your kids squirrel hunting America

marksman wrote:
March 11, 2013

J-rod, You must live in one of those infringement states lol j/king. You are probably in Florida where the law says you have to wait unless you have CPP (if you got a true CWP then you should carry a SBR in Your truck :). Where I'm at you go in buy and then walk out with a pistol or rifle. Even if you don't have a CPP.

Rich wrote:
March 04, 2013

I purchased a stainless laminat 597 in a .17 hmr for $570 before tax so yes $600

Rich wrote:
March 04, 2013

I purchased a stainless laminat 597 in a .17 hmr for $570 before tax so yes $600

J-rod wrote:
February 15, 2013

You could have left the store with the rifle that day if you had Concealed Weapons Permit. I just bought a Savage 93r17 on Tuesday night. I've left Dicks Sporting Goods in Boynton Beach with every rifle I've ever purchased the same day b/c I have my CWP.

Eric wrote:
February 12, 2013

Bought a 770 because gander couldn't release my Ruger GScout in time for my flight out to hunt even though it was a week later and the stupid 5 day rule here in PB County , Fl even on long guns for hunting were in effect ... Bought a 770 Rem at Wally World in SC and what a junk... Never again for ammo or a gun purchase Remington ... Learn from your mistakes and come out of the jerk the one that puts you in continued business around mentality and I will possibly look at your products again ... So long ...

jos wrote:
January 11, 2013

i have a CZ 452-2E ZKM .17HMR bolt action, and its the most accurate rifle i have ever fired! i shoot at penny coins at 50 to 70 yards and i can knock all them down! its a bery good rifle! too bad remington had that problem with its rifles and they dont want to give a full refund, i dont buy nothing from remington anymore, no mamo no guns!!!

icicicles wrote:
November 29, 2012

To bad for Remington, after reading these reviews, I did my homework and setteled on two new Savage .17HMR Model 93 R17 BTVS Rimfire Rifles @ $419 each threw Gander Mtn. I have a Remington 308 but I'll never buy another Remington gun or ammo again. Sorry to those that lost from this back stabing American Co. American Corp's better wake up or they LOOSE!

cornmeal wrote:
October 29, 2012

I am an member of the Savage 17 hmr club. It has been a great gun especially after it was scoped out. I enjoy it a lot. I just shoot cans and such. Great caliber.

sean wrote:
September 10, 2012

yea i had a the same with my savage. a squib round. got a fair fright man it desintegrated the back of the casing blew the magazine out and bent it. i never realised it was such a problem until i started checking up on it. ive put the bones of 1000 rnds through it and no squibs until now.. thought it might have been a bad batch but i check the all the bullets now and there is always two or three dodgy ones.. they would wanna sort it out.

bob wrote:
September 03, 2012

hi yes ive had the same problem with ammo getting stuck and back firing really quite scarey now found the cause if you open a brand new box of ammo and check around the neck for splits, its were the bullet has been made and was pressed to tightly together causing a split. all of my ammo was returned to edger bros were i got a "new batch" of qualtiy checked ammo sent out

Harry wrote:
August 06, 2012

The problem is bad .17 HMR ammo which causes squibs. My Marlin .17 HMR blew up on me three weeks ago (no injury)because a bad load stuck inthe gun. The ammo? Hornady .17 cal 17 gr VMax. Anyone else have this problem?

Matt wrote:
July 23, 2012

The 597 in .22lr is 180-200$, was the .17hmr really 3x that? I doubt it..

Brad wrote:
May 26, 2012

I have a single shot, heavy barrelled H & R rifle in 17 hmr. Very accurate, especially for 140 bucks!

nicgormly wrote:
April 12, 2012

this is a bit of a blow for me. i have been waiting for a .17 hmr semi to come out at a reasonable overall package (weight, handling, price) to tryout over here in australia and they've gone and recalled it. glad i didnt lash out and buy an early one to have to give it back. i reckon it would have been a bit hard

Justin wrote:
March 22, 2012

Ah the henry golden lever action! This thing is a tack driver, me and my bro were popping pill bottles tops off at 50 yards with not but the iron sights! After putting a small 10x scope on her, I don't think I've missed a single varmet in he past year :D

lapinebob wrote:
March 14, 2012

I have a .17 HMR and .17 Mach 2. Both rifles. The biggest issue I can see for semi-autos is a dirty barrel. I clean my barrels at <10 rounds. After 7 rounds a bore snake will not drop through the barrel. I love the .17's, they are very accurate and fun to shoot, but the barrel must be cleaned frequently

Bthomas wrote:
February 28, 2012

Ive got a Henry Varmint .17hmr. Great rifle, very accurate even with iron sites only.

Big Al wrote:
February 27, 2012

I had a remi .17 hmr semi and it was the best turkey rifle I've ever had. The recall was a kick in the junk. I took the buyout and bought a .22 wmr 597 semi since it could only be applied towards another rifle It's a decent turkey gun. Because of the crappy way remington treated us this will be my last.

Roger wrote:
February 16, 2012

I too own a Savage, 93R17, and love it. Shame on Remington for not giving a better refund. Ruger made a 17 HMR on the 10/22 frame, took it off the market 2 years later. Frankly spoeaking, 17 HMR isn't safe in a semi-auto, though it's great in a bolt gun.

Allen wrote:
January 19, 2012

I have a savage 17 hmr also and I've fired close to 500 rounds through it, and every time I take it out I love it even more. Its great for popping crows and groundhogs easily out to 150 yards.I cant understand the deal about Remington not giving the consumer a full refund, maybe thats why I dont buy Remington.

BILL wrote:
January 12, 2012

I have fired thousands of rounds thru my many Volquartsen autos with no problems. I clean the chamber area every 150-200 rounds.The pocket where the rim seats in the bolt needs to be cleaned at the same time. It seems that the blow by tends to accumulate there and fails to let the cartridge seat fully causing the cartridge to fail where the firing pin strikes the rim.

Keith wrote:
December 23, 2011

If this is true Remington is way out there on this. Comparing apples and oranges, my son bought a Browning Buckmark after 3 days and 500 rds it blew up in his face , with no injury to him. It looked to be an ammo issue (Remington bulk ammo) and Browning sent him a new pistol no question ask. With that said this deal with Remington and their recall doesn't make a heck of a lot of sense.

Gordy wrote:
December 08, 2011

Remington exchanged my 597 .17 for a 597 22 WMR. Has anyone have information on the Volquartsen automatic rifle in the .17 HMR?

David Fowler wrote:
December 05, 2011

I have a Marlin Model 917VS .17 HMR bolt action that I actually took to Africa for a three month trip this year. I used the gun to take out monkeys & baboons for a friend of mine that allows me to hunt for free if I cull the monkeys and baboons. I was out one day and a beautiful bushbuck walked out and I could not resist when it got to 40 yards I shot it behind the ear it jumped 3 feet in the air came down with blood going everywhere and I put another one in the head and it dropped. I have shot them with a .325 WSM and .50 Cal. muzzle loader and .300 WSM and none have ever dropped as fast. I went to the shooting range every week while in Africa and could hit their metal gongs 4" dia. every shot at 200 meters if the wind was not blowing. I love this gun and everyone that shoots it wants it. I shoot the CCI 17 grain hollow points and 20 grain solid points. It is a blast in Africa taking out the monkeys and baboons and it is free.

liftstation wrote:
October 28, 2011

What is wrong with gun manufactors, okay a problem lets give back to the consumer 1/3rd of what they paid for our product,and we get to keep the rest. Well guess what wherever the gun was bought the manufactor has the owner's address, if the gun owners are not notified and someone gets hurt I hope that $200 is worth the savings for remington.

Mike Bender wrote:
April 22, 2011

I see a complimentary remark on the Henry Golden boy. I too have one and I can say with conviction Henry backs their firearms. The rifle worked flawlessly but the tube from the ammo filler was so tight my grandson could not refill the rifle. I took it back to Gander Mountain, they removed the too tight parts and sent them back to Henry. Henry mailed the correct fitting new parts and paid the gunsmith for the whole cost. What more could a happy hunter ask for?

Mike Bender wrote:
April 22, 2011

I bought a savage .17 HMR from Gander mountain for $250 about one year ago. It has exceeded my expectations. It has been completely reliable. I think I have fired about 500 rounds through at this point. I caught a sale at Gander Mountain on the .17ammo. They had a whole oversize box marked down so they were about 1/3 off. That little round is a zinger. With a big scope it can swat gophers at 300 feet with ease. Out to 500 feet it starts to lose a bit of accuracy. Hits that far out on gophers are maybe 3 out of 5. It can still knock down ground hogs with one shot though, bigger target. As I heard it rumored, the .17 in semi auto was having problems getting fully into the chamber on second or following rounds. That left the possibility of a discharge while not seated which would result in a flash back to the users face. Rimfires are not forgiving of a hit to the rim. That is the best I can tell you. It would be bad if someone spent 600+ on a Remington and then they only offer $250 for a return. I would keep mine and hold it against them as proof they don't back their gear. The $250 price on the Savage was the big draw for me. I can't imagine a rifle working smoother or being any more accurate at any price. If you still have some of that sweet, flat shooting .17 left, get out there and find a Savage like mine and enjoy it. Gander has them on sale now for $230!

gregg wrote:
March 06, 2011

I love that Henry stands behind it's rifles. Get a golden boy .17HMR like I did and fall in love/ I did have one problem. They fixed oit no questions asked

Bog Rat wrote:
March 01, 2011

Nick, Good question, I'd like to know too. I am assuming that there is the possibilty of a slam fire in the chambering cycle due to the resistance of the shoulder on the feed ramp (something that won't happen on a straight sided case like LR or WMR perhaps). Couple this with the moderately heavy powder charge and the corresponding recoil spring that you need to counteract the rearward force of the breech, when its cycling forward it has a good ole shunt against a fragile rim if the shoulder encounters any resistance....or maybe I'm talking Cahunas!

Nick Hess wrote:
February 05, 2011

Why the recall?What makes them unsafe?Nobody said what the problems are.Please explain.

Pat Edwards wrote:
December 30, 2010

Remington has lost more customers due to their policy of 200.00 or 250.00 buy back program for the 597, .17HMR. If the gun cost 600.00 how does it lose value to us the consumer. My family were Remington customers for years, never again. The new American way, screw the consumer.