Handguns > Semi-Auto

Top 10 Challenge

Did the Beretta Model 92FS/M9 deserve inclusion in our Top 10 Handguns list?

When American Rifleman published its feature on the “Top 10” handguns (September 2009, p. 60), the editors knew they’d raise the ire of many readers who would feel that their own pet sidearms had received short shrift. Those who have come to appreciate the Beretta 92FS, a.k.a. the U.S. military M9 service pistol, were among the first in line to express such sentiments.


The Beretta 92 traces its genesis to 1970, when Giusseppe Mazzetti and Vittorio Valle—reporting directly to CEO Carlo Beretta—led a design team of up to 15 engineers tasked with creating the ideal high-capacity, double-action 9 mm service pistol. The new gun incorporated Beretta’s own open-slide design of the Model 1934, a locking block system inspired by the Walther P.38 and, at first, a double-action mechanism with similarities to both the Walther and the contemporary Czech CZ-75. The first prototypes, with frame-mounted thumb safeties, were complete by 1975.


When the House Appropriations Committee gave the nod for a new U.S. military service handgun that would comply with NATO specs, the Beretta 92 was in the right place at the right time. Beretta unstintingly sent engineers back and forth across the Atlantic to ensure that the family gunmaker’s entry would absolutely conform with what the Joint Services Small Arms Project (JSSAP) mandated. The safety lever was moved to the slide to double as a de-cocker, an M1911-style magazine release button was placed in the “American position” behind the trigger guard, and an internal firing pin lock was incorporated. The original 92 morphed into what we now know as the 92F, which the U.S. military adopted as the M9.


That adoption in the mid-1980s created a firestorm of complaints from M1911 fans, .45-cal. fans and, especially, rival gun manufacturers and their congressional delegations. A commotion was raised, and ultimately a second exhaustive comparison test was undertaken, circa 1989. This one also resulted in the Beretta being selected and, ever since, it has been the primary standard U.S. military pistol.


All the other classics in American Rifleman’s original Top 10 had their detractors, then and now, and certainly the Beretta 92 is no exception. Its shortcomings have just been more thoroughly and publicly addressed and, usually, more decisively set aside. Did some guns exhibit separated slides? Yes, as few as 14 cases were documented, out of more than 3 million such pistols, and generally they were attributed to overly hot ammunition. There seems to have been none since the 92FS design change. Did some locking blocks crack? Yes, until a design change dramatically improved their durability.


Questions about the 92FS/M9’s shootability have gone by the wayside. Through the years at Camp Perry, Berettas accurized in the style of David Sams and the military marksmanship training units have surpassed the best accurized M1911s in the winners’ circles in Distinguished and President’s Hundred events. IDPA and IPSC national championships have been won with Beretta 92s “street-tuned” by such ’smiths as Ernest Langdon.


A batch of Check-Mate low-bid magazines with rough interiors caused Beretta jams in “the sandbox.” Check-Mate apologized and changed its design; the Marines bought Beretta magazines; and Beretta itself came out with a special “sand magazine.” These improvements seem to have fixed the problems, but the rumors continue. The facts contradict the rumors. Circa 1984, Beretta beat all comers in the military reliability contest, with a rate of one malfunction per 1,750 rounds. The most recent government test shows a malfunction rate of only one in every 20,500 rounds, Beretta executive Jeff Reh has proudly announced.


Yes, 9 mm NATO ball is not the best choice as a man-stopper, but this can’t be construed as a Beretta defect. Police officers in DeKalb County, Ga., laid waste to bad guys with the tremendously effective Federal 115-gr. +P+ hollow points out of their Beretta 92s … Los Angeles County and LAPD stopped worrying about the 9 mm stopping power of their Beretta 92s when they were issued high-tech Winchester Ranger hollow points … and FMJ-LP (low penetration) loads have improved the effectiveness of U.S. military units who’ve been issued this Federal 9 mm round, which is a modification of the company’s Expanding Full Metal Jacket design by Tom Burczynski.


Despite annual rumors of change, the U.S. military buys thousands—some years, tens of thousands—more M9 pistols, manufactured in Maryland by Beretta USA. Ironically, the Beretta 92’s vocal critics were the ones who forced the intensive testing that made the 92FS/M9 perhaps the most thoroughly evaluated—and thoroughly combat proven—fighting handgun of our time. “With enemies like these,” fans of the Beretta 92 might well ask, “who needs friends?”


Share |

Comments

ADD YOUR COMMENT

Enter your comments below, they will appear within 24 hours


Your Name


Your Email


Your Comment

12 Responses to Top 10 Challenge

C.W.Douillard wrote:
November 14, 2012

I recently purchased a used[20rds.] 92fs, the previous owner had issues with ownership. The front and rear sights are marked with round white marks. Is this stock, or special addition?

C.W.Douillard wrote:
November 14, 2012

Another Gunner at my work was discussing the stopping power of the 92FS 9mm. His friend had just purchased a .40 cal. barrel to replace the original. I can imagine that would be a sufficient round.

Gator Weiss wrote:
November 08, 2012

I carried one in the military. I carry one in law enforcement. Easy to hit with. Safe pistol to work with. But the slide mounted safety will sometimes get pulled into the safe position when shooters hastily work the slide. Personally I think it is a very good pistol. Many officers prefer the Glocks and other plastics. I have some plastics. But I really prefer my Beretta 92fs because I can shoot it well. The factory sights are just fine. 9mm is plenty. The pistol is good enough for what I do.

Kenberg wrote:
September 29, 2012

I am still waiting for a 'Beretta 92 type' gun in .45 caliber...it's would arguably be the ultimate handgun.

JM Nicol wrote:
July 24, 2012

I bought an Italian made Beretta 92SB Compact in the early 1980's. I am having trouble finding information about it and even the US Beretta website does not recognize it's serial number. Can anyone provide sources for reference?

carl Isgrigg wrote:
July 23, 2012

I served twenty yearsin the Marine Corps and carried both ..1911 and Baretta. Qualified expert with both.At first I preferred the 1911 but as time went by I fell in love with the Baretta,it feels comfortable in my hand and is very accurate. I've carried glocks in law enforcement as well, they are good guns,but if you look at all the testing the military did to determine the reliability of a weapon nothing beats a Baretta 92..I carry one today...

A. Giroux wrote:
July 18, 2012

Your Beretta 92fs piece stated that the safety was changed from the frame to the slide. I have a Taurus pt92 that has a frame mounted safety/decocker. Does this mean that my Taurus is 2nd rate? A.Giroux Sonoma, Ca.

Mack Missiletoe wrote:
July 05, 2012

It's a very interesting design with the open top. Nothing wrong with great test results. I notice a lot of people will push their new gun without realizing it has not been tested and refined like the Beretta. I've been wanting to shoot one for a while now. Maybe the gun range has one for rent. As far as 1911's go... well they cost more. Perhaps that's why the military prefers the M9. More cartridges for less. 2 rounds of 9 is more powerful than 1 round of .45, no?

Huge 1325 wrote:
April 12, 2012

Because they don't make a .46 and deader is better!

Nicholas Preble wrote:
September 20, 2011

LEO's and Swat choose 1911's for a few reasons.Reason one is that a .45 is a much bigger round . It has a lower FPS which decreases the chance of the round going through walls or the suspect. Another big reason they choose 1911's is because 1911's are the most accurate .45 on the market, Full size 1911's have a longer site radius then any other full size pistol.

Norm Cook wrote:
June 01, 2011

Because they are making up for a deficiency in another area? Kind of like guys that drive big trucks or corvettes, y'know? I haven't had a Beretta fail me yet, or a 9mm for that matter. Carry what you want, but don't hate on a design that has proven to work just because the "elite" think they need a bigger gun.

Charles Kempton wrote:
February 12, 2011

Why do so many of our special forces operatives and police swat units choose 1911's and the .45 acp?