Rifles > Exploded View

Lee-Enfield No. 4 Rifle

The Lee-Enfield No. 4 Rifle served the British Army during World War II and beyond.

In 1939, the British soldier was still armed with the same rifle his father, or perhaps even his grandfather, carried. The Short, Magazine Lee Enfield (SMLE) delivered sterling service from the mud of Flanders to the farthest reaches of the Empire. With Hitler’s war machine on the move, the British needed an accurate, mass-production rifle. Thanks to inter-war development, an improved and simplified design was waiting in the wings, and the No. 4 Mark I rifle was adopted on November 15, 1939.

The No. 4 Mk I, chambered in the same .303 British cartridge as the SMLE, retained the better features of the SMLE (in 1926 the SMLE was renamed the No. 1 rifle), but changes were made to the receiver, bolt, stock, sights, barrel, nose cap and bayonet. While being similar in appearance and features, very few parts were completely interchangeable between the No. 4 and No. 1. The No. 4’s receiver was strengthened and squared off; requiring less milling and simplifying manufacture. A simple one-piece charger bridge to accept five-round stripper clips was fitted into grooves on the top of the receiver, as opposed to the No. 1’s rounded bridge. The SMLE’s complex-to-manufacture nose cap was discarded in favor of a milled, and later stamped, front reinforcing band and a simplified sight guard. The No. 4 also had a heavier free-floating barrel, which protruded from the fore-end and eliminated the need for precision full-length bedding.

No. 4s had four types of aperture backsights. The Mk I micrometer backsight was made of milled steel with a battle sight set for 300 yards, which when flipped up was adjustable for elevation out to 1,300 yards. The Mk II had a simple, stamped, two-setting aperture sight. The Mks III and IV were also made from stampings, but, like the Mk I, had provisions for sighting from 300 to 1,300 yards.

New government ordnance factories set up to produce the No. 4 were Royal Ordnance Factory (ROF) Fazakerley in Lancashire and ROF Maltby in Yorkshire. Birmingham Small Arms (B.S.A.) Gun, a private company, also established B.S.A. Shirley in Birmingham to turn out the No. 4. All three began producing No. 4s in 1941. Despite its role in developing the design, the Royal Small Arms Factory Enfield did not produce any of the 2 million-plus No. 4 Mk Is made in England during the war.

In early 1941, while America was still officially neutral, the British Government contracted with Savage Arms Corp. to build 200,000 No. 4 rifles at the former J. Stevens Arms Co. factory in Chicopee Falls, Mass. After the entry of the U.S. into the war, Savage continued to make the No. 4 under the auspices of lend-lease agreements. The lend-lease Savage-made rifles were marked “U.S. Property.” Long Branch Arsenal, located near Toronto in Ontario, Canada, produced about 330,000 No. 4 Mk I and I* rifles. In sum total not only did North American orders bolster British production, but actually exceeded it during the war. The No.4 Mk I* was not actually adopted until 1946, despite being produced at the North American factories as early as 1941. The principal variation was in the method of bolt release. The bolt ribway had a new slot cut for the bolt head to be pivoted upward, out of the ribway. The machining at the rear of the ribway, the bolt-head catch, spring and plate were then no longer necessary.

Disassembly
Disassembly of the unloaded No. 4 Mk I begins with depressing the magazine catch (28) and removing the magazine (35). Open the bolt (10) and move it partially rearward, then depress the bolt release (25) and allow the breechbolt head (6) to ride on its rail over the release. Rotate the breechbolt head upward and draw the bolt assembly rearward and out of the receiver (31). For the No. 4 Mk I*, open the bolt and ease it backward until the breechbolt head lines up with the recess in the bolt guide rail, rotate the bolt head upward and remove the bolt to the rear. It may be necessary to flip the backsight (18) to allow the bolt head to clear the receiver on both the Mk I and Mk I*.

Turn the breechbolt head counterclockwise and off the breechbolt body. Twist the cocking piece (2) until it moves to the lower of its two notches, taking most of the compression off the mainspring (4). Turn out the slotted striker screw (1) on the rear of the cocking piece. The striker (5) is screwed into the cocking piece. There are two notches on either side of the striker’s shoulder about 1 inch down from the striker’s tip. To remove the striker, insert a takedown tool from the front until the projections on either side of its point engage the notches. Then, simply turn out the striker.

Fore-end (38) removal begins with unscrewing the front band swivel screws (41 & 43) and removing the two front barrel bands (40 & 44) and the front sling swivel (42). Next, turn out the front guard screw (36) and the rear guard screw (15), allowing the trigger guard (34) with the trigger (32) attached to be pulled off of the fore-end. The fore-end is now free to be pulled off the bottom of the barreled action. To remove the buttstock (53), flip up the buttplate’s (50) trap, insert a long-bladed screwdriver into the recess in the buttstock’s rear and turn out the stock bolt (48) and its washer (49). Reassembly is in the reverse order.

 

Share |

Comments

ADD YOUR COMMENT

Enter your comments below, they will appear within 24 hours


Your Name


Your Email


Your Comment

24 Responses to Lee-Enfield No. 4 Rifle

steve smith wrote:
March 04, 2013

well i got 1 of them just aquired it , but to my surprise, it was still packed in grease, and never shot.. date of manufacture , 9 1943.

j-rod wrote:
March 03, 2013

how do i no if this is the model i have it is kind of hard to read but i belive it says no4mk173(f)fti does this mean anything to anyone? i have a complete gun and clip any one no a value on this

Eddie Coughlin wrote:
February 02, 2013

Hi, I have a BSA mk4 smle rifle and I've stripped it down for cleaning, but can seem to reassemble, and one got and tip on how to put the trigger mech back together...? Regards ed

perryj wrote:
January 29, 2013

would like to id mfr of my smle #4 mk1/2. ser#38711A,mfrd 1944,ftrd 1948. has mic rear sight.BNP on receiver bridge and what appears to be Nl7 on r/s wristband. can you help?

Wayne wrote:
January 28, 2013

I have a 1942 British enfield and I need a magazine and a bolt for it. It is a no 4 mk1. Any clue where to get one. Thanks

Tyler wrote:
January 21, 2013

Yes, its an 's', and it DOES look blocky. I too have a, thankfully, lightly sporterized No.4 mk1* from Savage. It seems only to have a synthetic monte carlo stock, and the front sight gaurd missing. What is the proper furniture for a Savage? Ive seen slotted handguards, ect and just wanted to get it 'right'. Numrich has a complete wood set for 98 bucks, and LibertyTreeCollectors has the individual ones...

James wrote:
January 21, 2013

I am looking for a bolt for a Mk 2. Does anyone know where to get one? I have looked every where and my gun buddies don't know where to get one at.

GKING14 wrote:
January 19, 2013

If it is an S it's the blockiest S I have seen.

Mark in TX wrote:
January 11, 2013

Mine reads S No.4 Mk I* I think it is a S and not a 5. I read on another blog today that the S means Savage. Said it could be an S or an S inside a square.

JT wrote:
January 02, 2013

Comments...Just picked up a no 4 mk1. mine is actually marked as a 5 no4mk1 don't know the significance of the #5. mmine does have the property of the US mark and on the pistol grip bandit says made in the USA then serial#. The stock at the upper barrel end is marked 78 5 G 0925 any history?

Vern wrote:
December 28, 2012

Last summer I found a NOS magazine for No1 Mk3 Lithgow built Enfield on gunbroker.com for 45 bucks. This was to replace a magazine which was damaged. While searching I found several original Enfield magazines both No1 and No4 type for sale on ebay and gunbroker.com most in the $40 - $50 range. Be advised the No1 and No4 magazines may look the same being similar. They are different. I have both types but have never tried to swap them to see if they are interchangeable. When comparing the two types look closely at the lugs on the rear of the magazine.

Bart wrote:
December 23, 2012

Rich & WJMIV...I would try IMA or Numrich Gun Parts Corp both have web sites.

Rich wrote:
December 20, 2012

I have a Enfield No 4 MK1 and I need to get a magazine for it. Does anyone know where I can get one? Thank you Rich

WJMIV wrote:
December 17, 2012

I am looking for a mag for my father's MK4 can anyone help me?

mike wrote:
December 09, 2012

I picked up a brand new N0 4 mark 2 from a fellow that was 80 years old in 2011 ( 1955 production @ fazakerly- canceled irish contract )...he purchased it in 1968...its beautiful !....price: 150.00 !....Im trying to find a magazine for a sporterized No. 4 mark 1, just the standard mag as the rifle i acquired was missing the mag....dont want the promag one, too many complaints on that...saw one at gun show today 12-9, but it was pretty beat up and guy wanted 30.00 for it, so i passed...spring felt weak in it and no bluing / surface finish left on it.....any sources ?

Neal wrote:
November 08, 2012

Dylan, 275 USD is an excellent price for a Mk I. Just verify it is in good working order and is not rusting

Dylan wrote:
November 04, 2012

I'm looking to get a lee Enfield no.4 mk1 and there's a local shop that has one for 275 is that a decent price if not what is?

mike wrote:
September 16, 2012

I just picked up a sporterized No.4, mk. 1 and am looking for a 5 rd. mag also....anyone know where to get one ?...also the rear sight has been removed along with the pin and am looking for one of those.

eric pierce wrote:
August 08, 2012

i have a no.4 mk1/2 and am having trouble locating a five round magazine for it if anyone can help i appreciate it

gunner1 wrote:
July 21, 2012

I have a no4 mk1 but it is engraved like some 1 put it on there not stamped.I cannot find any other markings on the rifle except for a small silver coin looking piece on the pistol grip part of the stock under the rifle. I really don't have any idea what I have.I can send pics. If anybody can help me. Thanks Gunner

Paul Anderson wrote:
July 14, 2012

Without seeing pictures I cannot be certain, but the only thing that sounds strange about what you've described is the lack of designation on the action body. That is somewhat unique, but it is possible to remove those marks (although why one would want to do that is beyond me.) The smooth-sided cocking piece is much less common than its ribbed counterpart, to be sure, but it's a legitimate variation. The flip sight you described is known as the Mark II, and was put in place as a wartime expedient. One can replace that sight with a micrometer / ladder sight easily. As for the grooved hand guard - it was not proprietary to Savage. The grooves were implemented as an improvement. All things considered, I suspect your friend may have a very early model No.4 that may or may not have undergone a rear sight replacement. I'd love to see pictures, especially of the left side of the wrist. With that I could very likely tell you when and where I was manufactured.

Eric wrote:
June 29, 2012

My buddy has a No4 that has some "odd" attributes (for a MkI as I know them...). What is this beast? The cocking piece of the bolt assembly is not serrated at all (completely smooth on both sides). The rear sight is just the flip sight, no latter sight and no provision for ever having had one (no pivot pin holes). The rear handguard is striated, like a Savage, but there are NO markings on the receiver but a serial number at the stock wrist... no "US Property," no "No4MkI," no nada... there are no other marks at the wrist either. It is not 'new,' but rather appears to have seen some significant amount of dirt and rocks and sand... and use. Thanks!

Mike wrote:
January 07, 2012

What would you like to know?

Rob Manson wrote:
November 20, 2011

I have a 1942 Enfield No4 Mk1 sniper with the scope, very nice condition. Can you advise someone I can email with pictures to get more info on this specific piece? Thank you.