Rifles > Semi-Auto

The MilSpec Definition

Can a civilian AR rifle be classified as MilSpec?

Like a starlet who acted in scores of B-movies before being “discovered” years after her debut, the AR rifle has suddenly become the darling of shooters nationwide. I don’t have to tell you what “AR” stands for, that it’s a generic moniker for any modern sporting rifle copied from Colt’s original AR-15 semi-automatic version of the M16 developed for the U.S. military.

What might help, though, is to explain what distinguishes one brand of AR from another. Beginning with this exclusive first installment for AmericanRifleman.org, I’m going to cover ARs from muzzle crown to buttstock and everything in between. My first topic is the term “MilSpec” and what it means.

Because the AR has become a generic product, like the 1911 pistol, manufacturers have tried to set themselves apart with advertising claims and counter-claims, each of them trumpeting that their brand is better than the others. But how can that be? It would be as if Ford, Chevy, Honda and Volkswagen all decided to make exactly the same pickup truck with different hood ornaments.

How would you tell one truck from another? You’d have to look under the hood. So let’s look under the hood of an AR, starting with what it’s not.

MilSpec Criteria
Here’s the deal, and it’s very simple: Only rifles made for the U.S. military are MilSpec. For more than 50 years and through numerous iterations, experimental models and improved variations, the U.S. military has developed a detailed list of specifications for its service rifle. These “military specifications” are iron-clad.

MilSpec criteria include every aspect of the rifle, from the materials it’s made from to the treatment of those materials, the dimensions of components made from those materials, testing of these parts, wear and durability, accuracy, service life—every excruciating detail is specified.

Finally, and most importantly, a MilSpec rifle is approved by a U.S. government inspector. The inspection process assures that all rifles bought on a government contract meet the MilSpec and a related criteria called “military standard” or MilStd.

Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, I present you with the first piece of irrefutable evidence in the case of the falsely advertised AR. A manufacturer cannot claim that its AR is “MilSpec.” By definition, a MilSpec rifle must be tested and inspected by the government.

If that’s not proof enough, consider this: There’s no such thing as a civilian-legal MilSpec rifle. A MilSpec rifle is a rifle made to fulfill a government contract and, as of now, there are only three such “animals” walking around: the M16A4, which has a three-round burst-fire selector; the M4, which also is equipped with a three-round burst-fire selector; and the M4A1, which is a fully automatic rifle. These are all classified as machine guns and no civilian transfers can take place for any machine gun manufactured after 1986. You cannot legally own a MilSpec AR.

What About Parts?
So if it’s impossible to own a MilSpec AR, what about an AR made of MilSpec parts? Well, if there were such a thing, the first place to look would be one of the companies that make MilSpec rifles for the government. Perhaps they might have some extra parts lying around that they could use to build a civilian-legal AR?

Colt and FN are the only two government contract holders building the M4 and M4A1, which is the latest, most “tacti-cool” version of the AR. According to Colt, who ought to know, there is no such thing as a commercial AR that is MilSpec, even if most of the parts are identical to MilSpec parts being used in Colt’s M4s and M4A1s that are delivered to the government.

Now if anyone has a vested interest in making you believe that their ARs are MilSpec, it would be Colt. After all, the M16 and M4 are built used Colt’s Technical Data Package (TDP) which is a complex combination of know-how, proprietary techniques, fixtures and proprietary information that the historic manufacturer developed over decades of production. Even FN, their competitor, is required by contract to use Colt’s TDP.

Yet Colt is the first to admit that their commercial ARs are not MilSpec! I submit to you, ladies and gentlemen of the jury, that you now have your second and final piece of conclusive evidence that there is no such thing as a MilSpec AR.

However, don’t despair. It may be true that there’s no such thing as a MilSpec AR or even MilSpec components, but there are indeed ARs made of components that meet the same MilStd or MilSpec criteria as a genuine U.S. military rifle, excluding of course machinge gun parts, illegally short barrels and no government inspection.

To delve into the MilSpec criteria for all the components, sub-components, springs, parts and even the finish of an AR is beyond the scope of this story. However, that information is easily available online. The best sources of such technical information on the AR are the forums over at M4carbine.net.

Rob Sloyer, a member of the site, has put together an extremely useful chart that details each and every part in an AR and shows which manufacturers are complying and which are not.

Too Much Information
After you delve into the minutia of bolt carrier groups, magnetic particle inspections, H-buffers, staked gas keys and all the other indicators of a quality-made AR that, theoretically, meets most of the MilSpec criteria, your brain is going to explode. It’s just too much information.

Here, let me make it real easy for you: If your heart is set on making sure your not-possible-to-be MilSpec rifle as close as possible, my advice is to buy a Colt 6920. The 6920 is Colt's semi-auto-only Law Enforcement Carbine with a 16-inch M4-configured barrel, rather than the MilSpec 14.5-inch barrel, and a flat-top receiver.

The street price of a Colt 6920 is about $1,350, but I Googled “Colt 6920 for sale” and found them at Impact Guns new-in-the-box for $1,199.

You need to comply with all federal and state laws for ordering a gun online, going through your local dealer to handle the FFL paperwork and NICS background check, so add $50 for your dealer to perform this service.

If a Colt 6920 is out of your budget, there are other great ARs out there. We’ll take a look at some of them in my next installment.

For more, check out AR-15 Tactical Accessories, Customizing an AR, AR Operating Systems: Gas Impingement vs. Piston and The Specs of MilSpec.

 

Share |

Comments

ADD YOUR COMMENT

Enter your comments below, they will appear within 24 hours


Your Name


Your Email


Your Comment

20 Responses to The MilSpec Definition

Michael wrote:
June 10, 2013

Good article,the author is right about full auto weapons built after 1986 being banned.

Brian Woodruff wrote:
May 02, 2013

The AR in both the AR-15 AR-10 AR-18 Comes from the original comapany to Produce the Rifle that being the Armalite company the company that Eugrnr Stoner worked for, the design was later sold to Colt

jim wrote:
May 02, 2013

eugene stoner produced the first ar10

Jim wrote:
April 02, 2013

For all you that call MGs class 3 they are not, class 3 is the FFL & they are title 2 or NFA weapons

Jim wrote:
April 02, 2013

It should have been called the SR for Stoner rifle, thank you Eugrnr Stoner.

GeoJames wrote:
March 17, 2013

In defense of the author, the comments about legally owning a full-auto by posters here are just contributing to the misinformation of yhe idiota in Wash, DC , and the media. Never did the author say you can't own a full-auto firearm. What he CORRECTLY stated is that civilians CANNOT legally own full-autos manufactured after 1986. Look up the '86 weapons ban and check for yourself, and please stop adding bad information to the outright lies used to infringe on my rights !!

James wrote:
November 11, 2012

I love how no matte what someone tries to have pissing match in the comments about technical information. But its a good article, buy from a reputable brand shoot it a lot and see for yourself if its up to "spec"

Rx7doyle wrote:
October 26, 2012

This guy is so wrong i don't even know where to start.. Mil-Spec: A document that describes the essential technical requirements for purchased materiel that is military unique or substantially modified commercial items. MIL-STD-961 covers the content and format for defense specifications. Mil-Std: A document that establishes uniform engineering and technical requirements for military-unique or substantially modified commercial processes, procedures, practices, and methods. There are five types of defense standards: interface standards, design criteria standards, manufacturing process standards, standard practices, and test method standards. MIL-STD-962 covers the content and format for defense standards. As mechanical engineer who has delt with MilSpec when I've designed for rockets and also ASTM and ISO Standards. I can assure you if you make a part and it meets all the requirements of said spec, it is that spec. It doesn't matter who inspects the part as long as you follow the specifications outlined and it conforms, it passes.

michael hayden wrote:
October 24, 2012

According to the 1986 nfa law a machine gun manufactured after 1986 can only be transferred to a class lll dealer or manufacture.The machine guns available to individuals who have a class lll licence are those guns built before 1986.The full auto weapons that you see civilians with are pre 1986 lowers and modern uppers.

E. Shultz wrote:
October 23, 2012

Quote: "I don’t have to tell you what “AR” stands for, that it’s a generic moniker for any modern sporting rifle..." I hope that the author is not implying that AR stands for "Assault Rifle", because that is what it sounds like to me... Perhaps you should clarify for those that DON'T know what it actually stands for... AR stands for ArmaLite Rifle. Just for all you Call of Doody types.

Bret Stevenson wrote:
October 05, 2012

THANK YOU for setting things straight! The term mil-spec is thrown about by so many 'experts' who get upset when I task them to define the term and fail to do so. Either buy a Colt or simply enjoy what you do own/shoot and get on with your life. Thanks again for putting that out there!

CLR wrote:
October 02, 2012

You CAN leagally own a fully automatic weapon if you aquire a class three license through the ATF. Very misleading for this article and D.D. to say otherwise. Do a little research first next time.

D.D. wrote:
August 09, 2012

This article is the most accurate and comprehensive that I have seen. BP, you may want to read the info in the link that you posted or get someone to explain it to you. You CANNOT legally own a fully automatic weapon manufactured after May 19, 1986. Period! So if you can find a M16 made before that then it is the only way. I believe the author was speaking to the larger audience of those unable to find such a weapon available on the market. I believe the gist was for more recently manufactured guns.

Josh wrote:
July 29, 2012

This article is pretty much all junk written by someone that thinks they know it all. Sorry :/

Jesse wrote:
July 13, 2012

Colt was the original manufacturer of the AR-15 civilian 5.56/223 version of the copied U.S. military M16. Armalite made the AR10 which was a 308 version of the rifle. Colt "edged", to put it politely, Armalite out of the military contract for the 5.56/223 government version. Read "American Rifle" by Alexander Rose to get the full story. Armalite countered with the AR18, a piston-driven gas system rifle that was never accepted by the American shooter ignorant as they are.

PEC wrote:
March 12, 2012

Colt was not the original manufacturer. It was ArmaLite.

Rob wrote:
December 08, 2011

Great article. All of your information is true and correct. I work for a Gov agency that deals with this type of thing. Thank you for the ggod read..

Mark wrote:
March 27, 2011

I was interested in trying to affirm my hope that MILSPEC be it weapons or electronis are all USA made with no 'wafers' from Japan etc. Am a NRA member myself.

BP wrote:
February 13, 2011

This is false, it is perfectly legal for a Civilian to own a Class 3 or "Mil spec" AR. Please edit this material so as to not further mislead others! http://www.atf.gov/firearms/faq/national-firearms-act-firearms.html#legally-acquire-nfa

W.L wrote:
October 26, 2010

Exactly what are "illegally short barrels"? Short barrels are perfectly legal if you have completed the appropriate paperwork, paid your $200.00 tax to the BATFE and live in a locale that does not prohibit them.