Rifles > Semi-Auto

The Specs of MilSpec (Page 2)

How closely do civilian AR specifications resemble those of the military?

Receiver Considerations
The lower receiver holds the fire control group, otherwise known as the trigger, hammer and sear, as well as all the other controls for the rifle: pivot pins, magazine release, safety, bolt release and receiver extension. The upper receiver is not all that crucial and is not even considered in Sloyer’s component-by-component comparison. It should have a proper M1913 specification Picatinny rail, but that’s about it.

The receiver extension is the round tube that sticks out the back of the rifle onto which a collapsible stock is attached and inside of which is the spring and buffer that returns the bolt carrier group into battery. If this part fails, you’ve got an expensive black club.

The receiver extension—often called a buffer tube—comes in two sizes: 1.14 inches and 1.17 inches. The 1.14 size is Military Standard, but it’s really inconsequential aside from the fact that we agreed to judge by the MilSpec criteria, and 1.14 is MilSpec. The only difference is that some after-market stocks don’t fit on a MilSpec receiver extension, although most makers offer both sizes.

It’s a good idea to have a heavy buffer, known as an H-buffer, in the buffer tube. The extra weight slows unlocking of the bolt and retards the cyclic rate of full-auto guns. It is MilSpec, so it’s our basis of comparison.

MilSpec also requires the use of .154 inch diameter pins to hold the fire control group (trigger, hammer, etc.) in place. This is important if you’re going to drop in an after-market trigger from Timney, Jewel or Giselle trigger.

Now according to this compilation of MilSpec with the Sloyer’s data comparing commercial M4s component-by-component, Colt’s 6920 is the only commercial AR-style rifle that hits all of the key indicators for military standards. What does this mean? Nothing really, only that the military’s main supplier of MilSpec rifles is following all of the military standards for their civilian rifles.

For more, check out Customizing an AR Rifle, AR Operating Systems: Gas Impingement vs. Piston, AR-15 Tactical Accessories and The MilSpec Definition.

 

<< PREV   1   2  

Share |

Comments

ADD YOUR COMMENT

Enter your comments below, they will appear within 24 hours


Your Name


Your Email


Your Comment

7 Responses to The Specs of MilSpec (Page 2)

Patrick wrote:
January 20, 2013

Great write up in understanding the platform and functionally for a AR15 owner.

theprof wrote:
December 20, 2012

what have you found for specific MIL specs regarding the performance tests a military rifle must pass?

Zach wrote:
November 21, 2012

The bcm website states that their bcg and barrels are mp inspected and hp tested. FYI

Wayne wrote:
November 17, 2012

Ok, I am by no means sexist but Loretta, unless you're referring to the first 5 years or so of the war you're full of it. The reality of it is a very high percentage of troops sit on comfortable FOBs and air force bases and never leave go outside the wire. They have air conditioner, wifi, phones, even stores and fast food restaurants. The closest thing they experience to combat is a poorly placed mortar round or uncontrollably shot 'Chinese rocket'. Women were only just allowed to have a combat MOS which is a very very bad idea, not because men are better than women but because of different muscle structure and menstrual cycle. At one point my company went about a month without the availability of a shower, I'm pretty sure that would've caused some form of infection or such if a woman was present. As an infantryman, my lifeline was the trucks (MRAP cougar), my gear including my weapon and everybody doing their job while I did mine with good communication. For the 'GI comment', I too have had times where a 'field strip cleaning' was not possible and just squirted CLP on the bolt through the dust cover and cocked the bolt to spread it around inside. For the most part though I took very very good care of my weapon. Headlamp, qtips, old shirt for rags, leatherman, CLP and a boresnake is all I ever needed to make mine spotless and flawless in function. The mechanics and cooks on our COP never maintained their weapons. They were pretty bad... Luckily the COP was never attacked after it was built and they arrived or it could have got them hurt or killed. It is not my intention to offend or belittle, that's just my opinion based on my experience.

Bret Stevenson wrote:
October 05, 2012

Mr. Hopkins remark about GI maintainance is not to offend, but to point out a common fact. I know this firsthand as a former GI at the 'tip of the spear'. I did not always have the luxury of a 'proper' maintainence during deployment. A common cleaning during these conditions consisted of locking the bolt back, a quick swab of the bore, use supplied 'toothbrush' to scrub chamber/lug area & bolt face and apply small amount of CLP to boltface enough to moisten ejector and extractor. Closed bolt and continued to drive on. Much to Colt's credit, my issued M16 ran just fine under these conditions.

SFC Loretta Sipes wrote:
September 21, 2012

"given that we clean our guns more carefully and treat them better than GIs in the sandbox." I find this generalization offensive. After spending 12 years in the military, I know that our weapons are our life. Don't make generalizations that you know nothing about. I have shown civilains how to clean their rifles to military standards.

John N wrote:
July 06, 2012

Comments. A good read for any AR builder. Good info for any AR fan.