Handguns > Revolver

Anything But Ordinary: The Chiappa Rhino (Page 2)

The new Chiappa Rhino has turned the revolver world upside down.

There’s no doubt that the lower barrel axis of the Rhino reduces muzzle rise and contributes to a more controllable revolver. The recoil is still there but is driven straight back into the palm of the hand. You’ll feel a bite with full-power .357 Mag. loads, but muzzle rise is so minimal you’ll first think you’ve had a misfire or even a squib load. The speed at which you can aim follow-up shots with this revolver is nothing short of astounding.

Final Thoughts
If your firearm purchases are driven by aesthetics, you likely won’t give the Rhino a second look. It is not sexy or graceful. On the other hand, if you’re a revolver aficionado and like the idea of a very controllable, powerful handgun for self-defense or even competition, the Rhino deserves some consideration.

I dare not speculate on its durability. My wife and I fired 200 rounds through the test gun, however, and we experienced only three malfunctions. These were with the Remington 125-grain Golden Saber .38 Spl. +P loads. On three separate occasions, when attempting to eject the cases from the cylinder, the ejector star jumped the rim of a case and left them only partially extracted.

Chiappa is offering 2-, 4-, 5- and 6-inch versions of the Rhino. Obviously, the 2-inch version is intended for the defensive-handgun market. It is indeed a bit heavy by today’s compact revolver standards, but is far more comfortable and controllable than revolvers twice as large. The longer-barrel versions might find a home with competition-revolver shooters because their recoil-reducing benefits are comparable to those of a compensated revolver. Also, S&W L-frame speedloaders work with the Rhino.

Maybe, the most important thing to keep in mind about the Rhino is that it is the first incarnation of the new millennium revolver. For more than 100 years we have not seen a significant advancement in revolver design. Now, with the Rhino, what we have is a small, lightweight revolver in a powerful chambering that is very controllable. That is indeed something. And, while Sam Colt may not approve, remember, about 30 years ago a lot of folks believed polymer-frame pistols were too weird to be successful, too.

Manufacturer: Armi Sport di Chiappa Silvia
Importer: Chiappa Firearms; (937) 835-5000; www.chiappafirearms.com  
Action: double-action, center-fire revolver
Caliber: .357 Mag. (.38 Spl.)
Cylinder Capacity: six
Frame: black-anodized aluminum alloy
Cylinder: steel
Barrel: 2"(tested), 4", 5" and 6", 
six grooves, 1:19" RH twist
Stock: black synthetic, one-piece
Sights: non-adjustable ramp front and notch rear
Trigger Pull: double-action, 10 lbs., 8 ozs.; single-action, 5 lbs.
Length: 6½"
Width: 17⁄16"
Height: 415⁄16"
Weight: 25 ozs.
Accessories: leather pancake holster, cleaning rod, owner’s manual and hard case.
Suggested Retail Price: $749

<< PREV   1   2  

Share |

Comments

ADD YOUR COMMENT

Enter your comments below, they will appear within 24 hours


Your Name


Your Email


Your Comment

20 Responses to Anything But Ordinary: The Chiappa Rhino (Page 2)

Sue wrote:
September 07, 2013

I don't understand those who think the Rhino is ugly. I think it is the sexiest revolver ever and sexier than most autos. I researched it because it looked cool, but bought it because of its engineering.

Frank wrote:
December 09, 2012

Lark Mason wrote " both the Chiappa Rhino and the Mateba Unica are automatic". This is incorrect. The Mateba Unica 6 was a recoil operated semi-auto revolver. The Chiapa Rhino is not. No part of the Chiappa Rhino action is operated by recoil or gas from the fired rounds 'automatically'. In single action mode, the cocking lever compresses the hammer/striker spring. In double-action mode, the trigger pull alone does that. The Chiappa is not the first low barrel revolver, nor is the DA/SA action revolutionary. It is just unique on the market right now.

Wendy wrote:
November 21, 2012

I went to purchase a semi automatic for defense, I didn't have the strength to work it quickly/properly. The Rhino was a dream, easy to use and the recoil was not bad! Recommend this to any female who needs a revolver for protection!

RAH wrote:
October 27, 2012

I own a Chiappa Rhino 200DS and fire it regularly. It has been a joy when it works. I have only a few issues since mine was replaced, yes replaced, under warranty. It still misfires rounds after about 900 rounds through the gun. Most of the problems are related to DA not single action. During its last repair, I mentioned the types of ammunition I was using, to the technicians and was told that i should try European ammunition as the American primers are more touchy. Is that even likely? I am wondering if the Rhino will be dependable enough for a carry gun in the future. Mine has been repaired 3 times before it was replaced and 3 since. Warranty service has had the gun as much as i have in the last year. Does anyone else have better results? Is it me or the design? RAH

wonderwheel wrote:
September 19, 2012

This is the revolver used by Annie Walker in the TV series Covert Affairs.

Daniel R wrote:
September 06, 2012

I have been researching since i heard about it. the barrels placement is sound in my mind because i can fire my break action 12 ga. one handed, while i wouldn't dare to with

Lark mason wrote:
August 09, 2012

To Shaun the Nosorog AEK 906 is only a double or single action revolver; both the Chiappa Rhino and the Mateba Unica 6 are automatic decreasing the trigger pull. That is why they are called revolutionary.

Shaun wrote:
April 16, 2012

LOVE my Rhino. Accurate, comfortable, and user-friendly. One note: If you own the 4" barrel version, you will have to have a custom holster made. Even Chiappa doesn't make one. I had a canvas shoulder holster I bought for a large S&W that fit it pretty well, but I'm going to have a leathersmith make a hip holster for it.

Stan M wrote:
March 11, 2012

This firearm looks like it's full of innovations that were done just because they were different, not because they improve functionality. I am skeptical of the fact that the decocking process is counter-intuitive for a revolver.

Sal wrote:
January 22, 2012

Sounds like a good idea. However, the smart play is to wait a few years as the inevitable improvements will be made.

Shaun Ludwick wrote:
November 29, 2011

I have been following the progress of the Rhino and have a question.... Why does every article tout the Rhino as "revolutionary" or "ground breaking" while consistently ignoring the Russian AEK-906 and AEK-906-1 revolver developed and built two decades ago? I've also scoured the net for info on the AEK-906 and have found very little in the way of details. Can someone please do an article about the original "revolutionary" revolver and give credit where credit is due?

D.Bloomquist Sr wrote:
November 04, 2011

Where di I purchase one of these and what outlet handles this pistol

Charley wrote:
October 09, 2011

Just bought the 200DS and could not be happier. Very accurate and little if any recoil. My wife has arthritis in her shoot hand and she says the Rhino 200DS is delightfull to shoot. We both could not he happier with the 200DS.

The Doctor wrote:
August 13, 2011

20.Recently purchased the 60DS in black. Shots very well and is easy to control. Recoil is very managable. The 60DS weighs in at just over two pounds, it is lighter than it looks. Have fired about 400 rounds so far with no problems. As much as I like the Rhino, my wife (at 5’4″ and 100 lbs) likes it even more. She can handle the 357 recoil. She likes it so much that she’s taking my 60DS and buying me a nickel-plated 60DS. What’s not to love about that!

Anders wrote:
June 29, 2011

@Shaun Ludwick: The full name of the revolver you mention is Nosorog AEK 906. And "nosorog" means "rhino". Coincidence?

The Skipper wrote:
April 28, 2011

As large and heavy as my Model 64, but without a track record of proven reliability. What is the point? A .357 round, fired from a 2" barrel, is no better than a .38 Special +P. If you need more than a J-frame, just go to either a 9mm or .45 autoloader.

Shaun Ludwick wrote:
April 25, 2011

I have been following the progress of the Rhino and have a question.... Why does every article tout the Rhino as "revolutionary" or "ground breaking" while consistently ignoring the Russian AEK-906 and AEK-906-1 revolver developed and built two decades ago? I've also scoured the net for info on the AEK-906 and have found very little in the way of details. Can someone please do an article about the original "revolutionary" revolver and give credit where credit is due?

Christopher Schultheiss wrote:
April 25, 2011

I purchased a 4 " and 6" Chiappa Rhino and finally got to try out the 4". My personal view of the revolver is 1) I like the unusual appearance that some call "ugly 2) I like innovation (I own 3 Matebas 's 3) The lower barrel alignment makes perfect physical sense however the jury is out as to whether the mechanical complexities will warrant the unusual barrel alignment. 4) Although I can't speak for the actual accuracy because the sight adjustment was off 6" at 25 yds, I didn't have my tool kit with me to adjust the sights. I can say that the grouping was good and I think that ultimately, it will be quite good. 5) I found the recoil and muzzle lift very reasonable for a .357 Mag -certainly much less than a Ruger Redhawk. 6) My wife. a very experienced shooter had difficulty pulling the "hammer" back as she has a bit of Arthritis. 7) Double action function was surprisingly smooth. 8) I felt that the quality of the engineering and manufacturing was very good. Overall In the short term, I am very pleased with the revolver and look forward to shooting it a lot more along with its 6" brother. .

Matt S wrote:
April 24, 2011

If you search for videos on youtube for this revolver you'll see just how controllable the recoil is. It's amazing to witness it! Fast follow up shots like a semi-auto but in a revolver package packing .357 magnum.

Keith wrote:
April 22, 2011

Very intriguing! If I were a revolver buff, I would get one right away, however, I will wait to see that all of the kinks (if any) are worked out first. I do like the idea of low recoil in a revolver. Now that I am thinking about it…I will recommend the Rhino as an option to my students who do not prefer a semi-auto or the recoil of a .38/.357.