Rifles > Bolt-Action

Savage Arms Lightweight Hunter Rifles (Page 2)

This extremely light and accuracy rifle is also affordable.

Through his paring, Bordecki met the Lightweight Hunter design goals of a 5½-pound short-action (Model 11) and a 6-pound long-action (Model 111), yet sacrificed nothing in terms of aesthetics. In fact, it’s downright pleasing to the eye. But Savage also kept the end cost low with a suggested retail price of $875. How does the series compare price- and weight-wise to similiar bolt-action rifles?

Browning has two “lightweight” versions: the A-Bolt Micro Hunter and the Mountain Ti. Depending on chambering (.22 Hornet to .325 WSM), the wood-stocked, short-action Micro Hunter weighs either 6 pounds, 4 ounces or 6 pounds, 6 ounces, and costs from $739 to $870 (.22 Hornet). The Mountain Ti, also a short-action but featuring a synthetic stock, retails for $2,070 to $2,100 (WSM chamberings) and weighs 5 pounds, 6 ounces to 5 pounds, 12 ounces (WSMs). Sturm, Ruger & Co. has the 16½-inch-barreled, wood-stock Hawkeye Compact-series, which ranges in weight from 5 pounds, 12 ounces (7.62x39 mm, .308 Win.) to 6 pounds, 4 ounces (.223 Rem.), and in .243 Win., 6.8 SPC and 7 mm-08 Rem., the weight is 6 pounds. They are priced at $843. Kimber has three “lightweight” contenders: the 84M Montana, 84M Classic and 84 L. Weighing only 5 pounds, 6 ounces, the Kevlar-carbon-fiber-stocked, short-action 84M Montana is the company’s lightest offering, though it retails for $1,312. The long-action variant increases the weight by 4 ounces. The slightly heavier wood-stocked 84M Classic is 5 pounds, 13 ounces, and at $1,172, costs a bit less. Add 5 ounces for the long-action variant.


From custom gunmaker New Ultra Light Arms’ (NULA), the intermediate-length action (.308 Win. class) M20, designated “Ultimate Mountain Rifle,” weighs a mere 5 pounds but costs $3,000. The long-action M24 “Ultimate Plains Rifle,” available in the .30-’06 Sprg. range of cartridges, weighs 5 pounds, 12 ounces but cost increases to $3,100. H.S. Precision’s PHL is 5 pounds, 12 ounces, but it retails for $3,175. The aforementioned rifles provide only a glimpse into current “lightweight” offerings; however, it affords a means for comparison. To me, given their features and price, the Lightweight Hunter-series rifles stack-up nicely to the competition.

Savage offers the Model 11 Lightweight Hunter in .223 Rem., .243 Win., .260 Rem., 6.5 Creedmoor, 7 mm-08 Rem., and .308 Win., while the long-action Model 111 is available in 6.5 mm x .284 Norma, .270 Win. and .30-’06 Sprg.

Why 6.5 Creedmoor? “Obviously, in a 5½–pound rifle, recoil becomes an issue,” said Dermody. “At the same time, if it is going to be used in western mountains, it’s very likely that it will be shot at long range as well. What to do? The 6.5 Creedmoor actually recoils like a .243 Win. and has the long-range trajectory of a .300 Win. Mag. We didn’t have to think to hard about that one. We like cake. We like to eat it, too.”

Testing
Mid-summer I had the chance to evaluate a .243 Win.-chambered Model 11 Lightweight Hunter while hunting with SOE Hunts outside of Sonora, Texas. During the sight-in and familiarization process, the rifle—combined with Winchester’s 100-grain Power-Max Bonded ammunition—proved remarkably accurate, as sub-m.o.a. groups, and some substantially smaller, were common. The rifle’s fine accuracy was untested in the field, though, as a mature axis buck failed to appear before I had to hand over the rifle to another outdoor writer. As a result, field-testing took the form of “carry a lot and shoot … well … none.” Still, the experience enabled me to evaluate the Lightweight Hunter’s “lightness.” Even when topped with a Bushnell 3-10X 40 mm Elite-series scope, and with a Shooter’s Ridge bipod and a sling attached, the rifle was a welcome reprieve from similarly equipped, standard-weight models. It was a joy to carry.

At the range, the 6.5 Creedmoor-chambered Lightweight Hunter, with a Bushnell Elite 3-9X 40 mm scope, proved as accurate, if not more so, than the .243 Win. used on the Texas hunt. But, know that the same abbreviated, “ultra-light” contour barrel that makes it a pleasure to tote also negatively affects accuracy to an extent. Almost without exception three shots were close, often linear, and invariably the remaining two produced “stringing.” Group size could have been reduced if the barrel were given time to cool between shots; however, I chose not to in keeping with its design purpose—hunting—wherein extra time between follow-up shots is seldom afforded.

Of the three loads tested, all of which were Hornady since it’s the sole manufacturer of 6.5 Creedmoor ammunition, the standout was the 140-grain A-Max match load, averaging 1.04 inches for five consecutive, five-shot groups at 100 yards. Not far behind, though, was the 120-grain GMX, which averaged 1.19 inches.

With conventional loads one can expect velocity loss due to the short barrel, especially in the long-action chamberings. By using ammunition with progressive propellants, such as Hornady Superformance, the loss will be minimized. For example, through an RCBS AmmoMaster chronograph, the two 6.5 Creedmoor Superformance loads—120-grain GMX and 129-grain SST—were within 27 fps and 16 f.ps, respectively, of their published numbers The sole standard load, the 140-grain A-Max, bested the published number by 2 fps, but this was due to cartridge efficiency. In larger capacity cases, and especially traditional loads, the numbers won’t be as close.

By providing the hunter desiring a lightweight rifle that’s affordable and capable of excellent downrange performance, Savage Arms has accomplished what few have. Considering the company’s history, though, it’s no surprise. It has successfully performed many balancing acts before.

Manufacturer: Savage Arms; (866) 233-4776; www.savagearms.com.
Action Type: bolt-action, center-fire rifle
Receiver: carbon steel
Caliber: Model 11: 6.5 Creedmoor (tested), .223 Rem., .243 Win., .260 Rem., 7 mm-08 Rem., .308 Win.; Model 111: 6.5 mm x .284 Norma, .270 Win., .30-’06 Sprg.
Barrel: carbon steel; 20"
Magazine: detachable, four-round box
Sights: none; drilled and tapped for optic
Trigger Pull: single-stage ; 3 lbs., 2.1 ozs.
Stock: oil-finished walnut; Model 11/111: length of pull, 131⁄2"; drop at comb, 13⁄8”; drop at heel, 15⁄8"
Weight: 5 lbs., 8 ozs. (Model 11); 6 lbs. (Model 111)
Accessories: Weaver-style bases, cable lock, owner’s manual
Suggested Retail Price: $875

<< PREV   1   2  

Share |

Comments

ADD YOUR COMMENT

Enter your comments below, they will appear within 24 hours


Your Name


Your Email


Your Comment

8 Responses to Savage Arms Lightweight Hunter Rifles (Page 2)

jeff paige wrote:
November 17, 2013

I have one in .308. Even tho lightweight, its very well balanced. A dream to shoot. Beats the hell out of the model 7 in accuracy dept. ...and looks. A real winner.

Brian Wilson wrote:
April 28, 2013

I'm surprised at the glittering generalites (and condemnations) of some posting here. I came to investigate the Savage Lightweight Hunter because I have lost 90% use of my left arm making it virtually impossible to support the front end weight of any rife beyonf M1 carbines, 10-22's and similar. I even had to sell my Win Mod 40 Featherweight - too heavy now. Hope to handle the Savage soon. Suggestion: remember there are many other shooters who, due to military service, auto accidents, debilitating muscular diseases are not able to shoulder the full range of models/calibers/weights some of you can. Not "physically fit" does not accurately describe those of us with various issues. I'll walk the woods, hills, canyons with anyone, all day, any condition. But carrying more gun weight than I have to or can accurately fire is unnecessary and not smart.

Cool Breeze wrote:
June 13, 2012

I can also carry a 7.5 pound rifle and choose to go with a light savage instead for elk and deer. If you can walk, you are physically fit enough for a 7.5 pound rifle......that sounds terribly naive and I question the integrity of any sort that would say that. this new gun is indeed a very serious hunting rifle.....so there

Thomas C. Rhino wrote:
March 05, 2012

Looks like a great rifle, Savage still an inovative company with great new ideas for the modern hunter, teaming this ultra light with the 7mm-08 (a premier modern deer cartridge)makes it a real winner!

styer_ssg69 wrote:
January 25, 2012

Sorry, but I can not agree with the statement that a 5.5lb 6.5mm is going to have to much recoil and cause bad shooting or that if you can't carry a 7.5lb rifle that you are not physically fit. I can carry that weight but chooose not to. I carry a custom 338 Ultra Mag shooting custom loads at 3050fps that weights 7.75lbs with it's Leupold Mark 4 Sniper scope. I weigh 160lbs and handle that recoil fine and I shoot a 0.452" group. I live and hunt in Alaska. When you hike 15 miles a day climbing 45-60 degree inclines with a 35-40lb pack for up to 10 days at a time in places that you will never see another human getting as light as possible is all you think about. That's serious hunting and serious hunters use seriously light gear.

KC wrote:
December 28, 2011

The velocity results noted in the test do not give any reason for concern about the barrel length. The rifle is obviously capable of more accuracy than a hunter can manage under normal field conditions. Thanks to Savage for offering this excellent firearm in more than one 6.5 mm chambering. Anyone that has not tried a 260 Rem. or similar cartridge should do themselves a fovour and try one.

iNOCENCIO SANTINO SANTILLAN CAYO wrote:
December 23, 2011

I AM A OLD NOT-RESIDENT MEMBBER WITH OLD ADRESPARAMONGA PERU 1964 TO 1969, THE W. GRACE & CIA AND WITH THE REVOLUTION END, AND NOW I WISH A MERRY CHRISTIAMS AND HAPHY NEW YEAR 2012. SINCERLI YOURS.

bhp9 wrote:
November 01, 2011

When a rifle weighs less than 7 1/2 lbs it becomes to light to hold for steady shooting in field conditions. The 6.5 mm's being built today do not have a fast enough twist for the 160 grain bullets which by the way are not being made by most ammo makers or bullet makers either. The short barrel creates excess muzzle blast and results in a lot of lost velocity to boot. Recoil will be excessive too resulting in poor shooting. Although the Savage rifles are very good quality guns, this new gun is not a serious hunting rifle. If you cannot carry a 7 1/2 lb rifle, you are not physically fit for hunting.