Rifles > Bolt-Action

Sniper War in Afghanistan (Page 2)

Today’s generation of snipers is the finest and most capable we’ve ever fielded.

Some enemy sniper teams have proven themselves dangerously effective. Two sniper teams—thought to be foreign mercenaries—roamed Hellmand Province for five months last year, killing and wounding British and American troops. Operating as two-man teams, they killed soldiers as far as 650 yards away, including four U.S. Marines and 10 Brits. The enemy snipers’ most amazing shot placed a round into a 9-inch parapet loophole to kill British soldier Darren Foster, aged 20. Another victim, a British sniper, was killed by a single shot to the head. During an 11-day period, elite British Special Air Service and U.S. Army Special Forces partnered to track down the two teams, finally cornering them in Hellmand Province’s Sangin Valley. In an anti-climatic finish, the barricaded enemy sniper teams were eliminated by precision bombs dropped by U.S. Air Force F-16s.

New Rifles, New Ammunition
It is with Afghanistan in mind that the U.S. is making significant advances in sniper rifles and long-range sniper ammunition. The Army’s 25-year-old M24 Sniper Weapon System, a .308-Win. rifle based on the Remington 700 action, is being replaced by a dramatically updated version, the XM2010, a Remington-built chassis rifle chambered for a new .300 Win. Mag. load. The new load, developed by Black Hills ammunition, pushes a 220-grain Sierra MatchKing bullet at 2,860 fps. Army tests found that the new load approximates the energy and accuracy of a .250-grain .338 Lapua Mag. load out to 1,500 yards, which is considered the new effective range for U.S. Army snipers.

This new .300 Win. Mag. load, the MK 248 MOD 1, also features a new propellant with an additive to reduce muzzle flash and a stabilized burn rate across a wide temperature range—from 25 below zero to 65 degrees F—a significant consideration for Afghanistan’s harsh climate and dramatic elevation variances. I’ve found that muzzle velocity can vary up to 300 fps due to the effect of extreme temperature changes on gunpowder.

However, the trusty old 7.62x51 mm NATO sniper round has not been forgotten. Its new load, developed at the Navy’s Crane Surface Warfare Center, incorporates a similar temperature-stabilized propellant and a muzzle-flash-reducing additive. Dubbed the Mk 316 MOD 0, the 175-grain load is being produced on contract by Federal Cartridge.

These new rifles and ammunition already are reaching the hands of American snipers in Afghanistan, where they’re being employed to regularly take out enemy forces at distances that were unheard of in World War II, Korea or Vietnam. Supported by state-of-the-art training and combat-experienced instructors, as demonstrated in Afghanistan, today’s generation of snipers is the finest and most capable we’ve ever fielded.

<< PREV   1   2  

Share |

Comments

ADD YOUR COMMENT

Enter your comments below, they will appear within 24 hours


Your Name


Your Email


Your Comment

35 Responses to Sniper War in Afghanistan (Page 2)

secret squirell wrote:
December 23, 2012

hathcock was nothing but a showboat in need of attention and a POG by trade when he first enlisted ....the real vietnam sniper to be recognized is chuck mohenny.... they both did great ,this comment was refrence to the over praise of hathcock ,as a school trained 8541/0321 we dont want to be recoginzed or put on a pedestal......semper gumby

arizona98tj wrote:
February 19, 2012

300 Win Mag....read page two.

southern cross wrote:
February 17, 2012

nobody said anything about 300 win mag why?

James Savanella wrote:
January 19, 2012

They could use some M 200 Interventions.

Doug Dunn wrote:
January 04, 2012

The M14 is a fine weapon as is, acurized it's great! Finally some thought and common sense. Very good folks! 1000 meters? make em duck.

B Zobisch wrote:
January 01, 2012

Great article... I think we need more analysis in the field about what weapons and loads all units should be deployed with. The cost of these guns and ammo is so low compared to all of our other options that we should probably be spending even more on better scopes, trainings and advanced ammo.

davehood784@gmail.com wrote:
December 18, 2011

Larry, sorry to put you on the spot but it is "The right to BEAR arms", not "the right to BARE arms." To bare your arms means to wear a tank top.

AFG Joe wrote:
November 24, 2011

"Why m14s why not LR8s with 20in barrels, scoped" Same reason why to ditch the M16: Anemic round. I have seen the Germans with some HK G3 topped with scopes out here. The Germans have G36 as well.

Fred Friedman wrote:
November 23, 2011

I agree with Larry Belcher! We must stay very vigilant that our 2nd amendment rights are maintained, no matter which party is in power.

Nelson Fox wrote:
November 23, 2011

As a Vietnam Veteran, and trained sniper,it is good to see the Army is still making use of the M-14 rifle. The modified M-14 is still the best sniper rifle to have when being attacked by a determined enemy unit. The bolt actions have better range, but the nothing beats the M-14 when faced with multiple enemy rushing you.

Jon wrote:
November 23, 2011

See one-kill one.

AFG Joe wrote:
November 22, 2011

Greetings from AFG. The military needs to go with one round: 7.62NATO. Solve the logistics issues, give an effective round out to range, with more energy, higher BC, then some anemic varmint round. Please dont tell me about the weight issue. We are loaded up with 45lbs+ in body armor, first aid, ammo, hydration, etc. The more weight and recoil of the M14 argument, man up and get to the gym. And even if I can carry more rounds of 5.56, does me no good if I cannot reach out and touch Haji at range or AFG winds (full value).

modrid wrote:
November 22, 2011

Why m14s why not LR8s with 20in barrels, scoped

Thomas wrote:
November 21, 2011

Military needs 2 rifles. One for short range urban, jungle, armored infantry ues. One for open , desert, plains use.

Rusty wrote:
November 21, 2011

God bless and keep you safe as you defend our freedom.

Copperhead wrote:
November 21, 2011

Too bad the SDM's are only given de-linked 7.62 ball ammo!

Dave Gowan wrote:
November 21, 2011

I compete with an AR-15 A2NM out to 600 yards with 80-gr Sierras. Have any of the soldiers or marines tried this combination?

Sam Longwell, MSG US Army [(]ret[)] wrote:
November 21, 2011

We used the M-14 as a long range rifle in marksmanship competition to 600 meters. Put a scope on it and you could easily do 1000 meters.

Mark Guest wrote:
November 20, 2011

Great reading.

dave summer wrote:
November 20, 2011

'white feather' hathcock would be proud.

neal churchill wrote:
November 20, 2011

When committed to a war, our nation must give our troops the best there is and allow them to defeat the enemy!

John Brincefield wrote:
November 20, 2011

USA!USA!USA!USA! GOD BLESSES AMERICA!

roger wrote:
November 20, 2011

Barrett makes a lovely sniper .50 caliber sniper rifle that can reach out to 3/4 of a mile and touch the Taliban

Jake wrote:
November 20, 2011

"Nearly the size of Texas" Read "smaller than Texas."

Larry Belcher wrote:
November 20, 2011

I just wanted to say something about our rights to bare arms. It is because of these right's this nation came to be, also it is because of these right's that I beleive other countries are afraid to try to try to invade this nation because thay will have to fight our people as well as our millitary. So if thay take our rights to bare arm's it my put this nation in danger that is my beleif!!!!!!!!

Mike White wrote:
November 20, 2011

Very Informative. Are any Snipers using a .50 Barrett? One of my favorite quotes was when a CNN reporter asked a Marine Sniper if he felt anything when firing on the enemy. The Marine said, 'Yes Ma'am, recoil.'

Big Dave wrote:
November 20, 2011

Plaster forgot to mention the upgraded ammo now being used in the m4/m16 which is helping to extend the fighting range of the regular infantryman. Optics are being used by most infantrymen as well.

Lyn Parrott wrote:
November 20, 2011

I had the pleasure to meet a Sniper School "associate." He is one of the finest, patriotic American's I've ever met. He came to my aid in an AZ bar during a discussion I was having with a anti war, "defense contractor" (there's a paradox or a Liar-- either way, he was a liberal).

H.B wrote:
November 20, 2011

its its about time they nrought in the M-14, cant beleave it took them so long, should of put it in actipn like the did the M16, but with better resuts,

MERLINTH wrote:
November 20, 2011

Conventional process? play "open house" no rules, treat as treated, these people will hopefully, in my wildest dreams, just revert to being "normal" members of the planet before it gets turned it into a car park...God, whoever folks think he/she is thanks the US, Russian et. al. arms industries for taking up the torch on this....... Withdraw all personnel an' Drone em'?

Ben wrote:
November 20, 2011

Nice article, good to see that technological is supporting our troops but it can not replace good training and dedication that the US military always has.

John wrote:
November 20, 2011

Just gotta love love it...

AJ wrote:
November 18, 2011

Nice job boys.

MilitaryDaD wrote:
November 18, 2011

God Bless all the 'Ghost's' out there for their 'oneshot onekill' abilities, but lest we forget what drives fear into the heart of Taliban fighter. They call it the 'MONSTER', we know it as the AH-64D 'Apache' come on out and GET SOME!

Clay Cooper USAF Ret wrote:
November 18, 2011

Long overdue! M14, if you can see them, you can hit them! 1200 yards, NO PROBLEM! Keep the target hot and full of holes! TARGETS UP!