Handguns > Semi-Auto

The Browning 1911-22

The Browning 1911-22 is true to the lines of the original, and a lot of fun to shoot.

12/21/2011

Smaller incarnations of standard-size guns are not a recent phenomenon. As early as the 17th century, scaled-down sporting and military arms were being brandished by the sons of nobility and “cadet” versions of muskets and rifles were produced for youthful attendees of military academies.

Diminutive copies of existing handguns were also built, though those generally appeared somewhat later than the longarms. Examples include the German Erma .380 ACP and .22 Long Rifle Lugers that were popular in the late 1960s, and the Spanish Llamas, in .32 ACP and .380 ACP, made for a number of years on the lines of the Colt M1911 Government Model.

Too, rimfire versions of service revolvers and semi-automatics have always been popular for training and plinking. Conversion kits were available for M1911s pretty early on as were actual .22 Long Rifle versions of the gun, most famously seen in the Colt Ace which premiered in 1931.

Appropriately enough, considering the name of the company and John Moses’ invention of the masterpiece Government Model, Browning has taken the rimfire/miniaturization concept to a new plane with its 1911-22. Approximately 85 percent the size of a standard M1911A1 (whose lines it emulates) this spiffy little .22 Long Rifle blowback promises to be a top-notch training aid for shooters with smaller hands, as well as a fun plinker, and great companion piece to a full-size Government Model. Plus, it’s just plain cute (a term I apply very sparingly to any firearm). The 1911-22’s optimum dimensions were decided upon by some clever computer work, abetted by the acumen of Browning’s engineers and designers, and are not only pleasing to the eye, but comfortable in the hand.

They say first impressions can be quite telling, and in this case that was certainly true. When the little Browning was received and opened at my FFL, everyone who had a chance to look at it was captivated. It was hardly out of its zip-case before I heard, “Uh, are you thinking about buying it?” followed by, “If not, I’d sure be interested.” I explained it was an evaluation piece that was on-loan, and had to be returned, causing glum faces all around.

Made entirely in the United States, the little pistol’s slide and frame are constructed from aircraft-grade 7075 T6 aluminum alloy, which is both durable and keeps the gun’s weight down to an even one pound. For added strength and proper function, the slide is fitted with a steel block that encloses the firing pin and extractor. The stainless-steel barrel itself is target-crowned and button-rifled, terminating at the aft-end in a dual-pinned barrel block with a polished feed ramp. As the gun is a blowback, John Browning’s swinging link/dropping barrel arrangement is unnecessary, and the barrel is rigidly secured to the frame by means of the slide stop pin, which passes through a hole in a lump on the bottom of the barrel block. Other than that, with the exception of the magazine, which we will deal with later, and a couple of minor alterations necessary in the scaling-down process, the 1911-22 incorporates all of the features of the parent .45 ACP, including the original’s 17.5-degree grip angle. It has a conventional manual safety and grip safety.

The finish is anodized matte black, giving the gun a decidedly martial appearance reminiscent of World War II-period Parkerizing, and stocks are G.I.-style checkered brown polymer. Sights consist of a basic military blade front, here thoughtfully provided with a ribbed face to help reduce glare, and a drift-adjustable, square-notch rear. Not much one can do to alter the from-the-factory sight arrangement but, hey, the gun is certainly not intended to be a competition piece and as such, the sighting is adequate for its intended purpose—plus, anything else would simply spoil the pistol’s classic lines.

All controls, to include the slide stop, safety catch and behind-the-trigger button magazine release are faithful to the parent pistol. One takes down the piece in the original manner by first removing the magazine, pulling back the slide and ensuring that the gun is unloaded. Next, simply turn the barrel bushing 90 degrees clockwise while holding down on the recoil spring plug. After the bushing has been turned enough to clear the plug, it and the recoil spring can be eased out of the frame. The slide is moved slightly to the rear until the takedown notch is aligned with the rear of the slide stop. The stop can now be completely removed and the slide moved forward off the frame. Remove the polymer recoil spring guide. (Note that the guide has a small projection on the rear, which fits into a corresponding dimple in front of the barrel block to ensure correct alignment during reassembly.) Finally, rotate the bushing counterclockwise until it stops, withdraw it from the slide and extricate the barrel. Reassembly is in the reverse order—and given the lack of swinging link, which has to be jiggled for proper alignment in the .45 ACP, and the less puissant recoil spring, the thing goes back together in a trice.

The 1911-22 deviates from the original most in its magazine, which, given the difference in caliber, rimmed vs. rimless cases and overall sleeker silhouette of the .22 Long Rifle cartridge, should come as no surprise. It is of blued, heat-treated steel and features a polymer base pad and follower. Loading is made much easier by the presence of dual follower relief buttons, and by using the thumb and forefinger the follower can be pulled down against its extreme tension, allowing one to easily slide 10 cartridges beneath the feed lips.

Browning touts the 1911-22 as being able to digest all types of .22 Long Rifle ammunition, including subsonic, high velocity and hollow point varieties. With this in mind, we toted an assortment of loads along with our evaluation pistol to the local range for its obligatory run-through. I fed it all sorts of different Long Rifles and, true to Browning’s word, the gun dealt with them in a reliable manner. Functioning was 100 percent as it cycled everything from Eley Subsonic Hollow Xtras to CCI Velocitors. Offhand, potting at targets of opportunity, proved the gun was pretty much on-target at the various ranges at which it was called upon to perform. It fit my small-to-medium-sized hand beautifully and was simply a delight to shoot, abetted in no small measure by a crisp 4-pound, 12-ounce trigger pull.

For the pistol’s formal target shooting session, I chose three types of ammunition that I thought would represent a reasonable cross-section of what would or could be commonly encountered. They were chronographed using an RCBS AmmoMaster.

The accuracy of my results at 25 yards were somewhat disappointing, and while I was able to keep shots in the general area of where I was aiming, I was not comfortable with accuracy testing the piece at that range. Bringing the targets up to 15 yards made all the difference; groups tightened considerably and I was able to achieve some pretty good results for a 4¼-inch-barreled plinker. For the heck of it, I pulled the bulls forward even more to a “combat” range of 7 yards and was, not surprisingly, able to do better—in a couple of cases coming close to halving some 15-yard spreads. The gun did have a tendency to shoot a scosh high, but horizontally, it was right on.

General observations on the 1911-22: One heck of a lot of fun to shoot, well-built, comely and user-friendly—especially if one is familiar with the standard Government Model and its variations. As noted above, it would make a heck of a training pistol. Did I mention it was fun to shoot?

There is no question in my mind the 1911-22 is currently the plinker du jour—and probably for many more jours to come. To make things even more interesting, Browning is also introducing a “Commander”-style version of the same gun with a 35⁄8-inch barrel, 6½-inch overall length and weight of just 15 ounces Not surprisingly the duo will also be available as a boxed set. The whole deal just keeps getting better and better.

Manufacturer: Browning Arms Co.; (801) 876-2711; www.browning.com
Caliber: .22 Long Rifle
Action Type: single-action, blowback-operated semi-automatic pistol
Barrel: 4¼" steel, button-rifled, target-crowned
Magazine: detachable, 10-round-capacity box
Sights: fixed-blade front, drift-adjustable square-notch rear
Trigger: single-action, 4-lb., 12-oz. pull
Stocks: checkered polymer
Overall Length: 71⁄16"
Weight: 16 ozs.
Suggested Retail Price: $600

1   2    NEXT >>

Share |

Comments

ADD YOUR COMMENT

Enter your comments below, they will appear within 24 hours


Your Name


Your Email


Your Comment

17 Responses to The Browning 1911-22

chris byrns wrote:
February 25, 2013

I just bought a Browning 1911 22 and it works fine for me I didn't buy it to carry. I bought it for my SOn so he will become familiar with the 1911. When he's old enoughhe will B able to shoot of 45 ACP with no problem. Besides it's a Browning M 1911 miniature if you had a brain in your head youwould know that dust little guns is going to be a collector and I will keep mine and shoot it and be glad it wasn't Moreexpensive. expensive. ,

Bob wrote:
August 11, 2012

its a ok pistol for little folks. I have one for my boy 11 yrs old... after appx 200 rounds of federal bulk 22 long rifle the little pistol broke.. yep guide rod + slide spring bent... browning has NO PARTS for this pistol unless you send it in and pay for shipping both ways .. ol well its now just a look at... hopefully some day browning will send you parts if you pay for them.. thats ok by me

johnb wrote:
June 04, 2012

maybe mr james isn't a pistol target shooter...I certainley would've gotten someone else to print a target before bad mouthing it so bad. Can a pistol be that bad to spray a 25 yd target ?? I have a .22 Llama also...bought it new many tears ago....it misfires now..the firing pin just leaves a barely noticeable mark on the case....maybe a spring or the pin itself....don't know..and the backstrap safety never worked....but i still like it..

Larry wrote:
June 03, 2012

Six hundred bucks for something that shoots so poorly our reviewer studiously avoided mentioning group sizes, decribing accuracy only in terms ranging from "disappointing" to "pretty good for a..plinker". For Six Bills, I expect better. Aluminum frame? OK. Aluminum SLIDE? NO, THANK YOU! I had the Llama IIIa .22 that was considerably smaller, ALL STEEL and, reliably center-punching beer cans at 20 yds, a tack-driving wonder compared to this cheezy Wanna-Be. In spite of what Llama claimed, the magazine held 12 rds. With my 3 spare mags and one-up-the-spout, I had 49 rds on me. I wish I still had it. I had a Colt .22 conversion which everyone under-rates as 'just a plinker' that off a solid rest would, honest-to-God, GROUP INTO 6" AT 100 YARDS. With this pseudo-Colt thing you're paying dearly just for the name Browning, which quite clearly means less and less with every new release. Again, and I can't stress this enough... BEWARE ANY GUN A REVIEWER WON'T GIVE GROUP SIZES FOR. Don't kid yourself... this thing is NOT a 1911 ... it's Browning's latest marketing stunt.

Eddie C wrote:
February 06, 2012

The article described my Llama .22 which I purchased May 1966 for 49.95 + tax, almost exactly, but smaller. It is all steel. Recoil spring guide,all steel magazine. No plastic, polymer or any of that other stuff that should not be part of any firearm. It was on my hip when outdoors, fishing, hiking, camping. I really enjoy caring it. The only time it did not function as it should is when I put some rounds in it that I found in a dresser drawer. No tilling how long they were there. It is truly a joy to shoot. I can chamber a round without the magazine and fire the weapon, which I prefer. Magazine is 10 + 1 in the chamber. The barrel is 3 5/8 rather than the 4 1/4. That would make it somewhat smaller than the Browning 1911-22. I have several 380's, 9MM's and 357 mag. that I carry, but I still like my Llama. I can drop it in my back pocket, holster and all.

Ken Martin wrote:
February 06, 2012

Just walked into house a short while ago after running 50 rounds through the pistol I bought last week. Fun, fun, fun, this is something the wife will shoot and does not cost alot in ammo. Now I am wondering if anyone is making a little nicer grips. 562.50 out the door for this baby. Bought one for brother, wished now I had kept both.

Billy wrote:
January 20, 2012

Well put Clayton. I like the idea of this weapon for the 3 best things about firearms... You get a .22, you get a 1911 and you get some fun! As for defense, you can build a TREMENDOUS amount of skill and accuracy dollar for dollar compared to .45 acp. That translates to repeated follow up shots, and less danger to bystanders.

Kevin wrote:
January 20, 2012

I have an original Colt Ace .22 that I inherited from my grandmother. I also have 1911's in .45. I have shot many, many thousands of rounds through the .22 and have become a pretty good shot from all the practice but my wife and my young son have small hands and the Browning would be perfect for them. Sure, it is more expensive than your average .22 but it's a 1911. Not your average .22. If someone told me my grandmother over-paid for that old Ace

Eric Kane wrote:
January 20, 2012

In reading the article the author states that the trigger pull is a crisp 4 pounds twelve ounces yet every message board I read says the trigger is a heavy 8 pounds. I wonder if the guns submitted for review have been given special treatment by the manufacturer. That would be a major reason for me to be reluctant to buy one.

Clayton wrote:
January 18, 2012

I think some miss the reason for the existence of this pistol. Its got something to do with passion; I'll certainly be getting one.

LDG wrote:
January 15, 2012

A .22 is in no way inadequate for self defense. At a typical self defense range of 10 yards a 22 will do the job just as well as a 45 acp for cheaper and easier. "Stopping power" arguements are a joke. Not only is the concept subjective and relative, but it's just plain ignorant to assume that a person won't stop when shot with a lower caliber. I'm pretty sure that most people will stop when you shoot them, whether you're using a pellet gun or a 10mm. I got the opportunity to shoot the 1911-22 the other day and was very impressed with its ability to cycle subsonic and hollow point rounds without a single misfeed. I agree that it is ridiculously overpriced, but it is a browning and therefor that is to be expected. It doesn't take away from the fact that it is a sleek, lightweight gun built on the most universally efficient platform of any handgun to date. It is a super fun plinker, and a good choice for a self-defense gun

J Walker wrote:
January 06, 2012

I'm looking at mine right now and there is NO gap to see the spring. Here is my complaint: The recoil spring guide is made of nylon and is showing wear after only 50 rounds. I expect to have trouble with it later. If this was done to reduce weight then it's misplaced since this gun is too light already.

PeterC wrote:
January 06, 2012

Interesting. I haven't seen any in the retail gun stores yet. There are at least a dozen on gunbroker.com, with no bids. What's going on?

J. Pierce wrote:
December 28, 2011

I recently purchased this handgun. Mr. James failed to mention that there is a serious gap between the slide and the frame and the return spring is visiable. This gap is large enough to allow dirt to enter. One of the pictures on the interactive web site shows this gap. This is not a gun that J.M. Browning would have put his name on.

David Madden wrote:
December 23, 2011

What absurdity to charge so much for .22 based on tech so old! Have gun companies lost their minds?

JackR wrote:
December 21, 2011

With all due respects, but if you're looking for something to carry or something for home security with some stopping power, than I would recommend any of the "Compact" 1911's by Cold (Defender"), Kahr, Kimber. Unless you're a hit man for the Mob, a .22 won't do the job.

ukant_cme wrote:
December 21, 2011

why spend that kind of money for 22.. get the 1911 as it should be...