first and last taurus i will buy timing was off was only hitting 2 out of 5 so sent it in and was told up to 6 weeks after a month i called customer service and was told that it will be at least six weeks ,so on top of buying a lousy gun im getting lousy service plus my wife cant pull trigger back so its going to cost me another 150 dollars for a trigger job.im a stupid man could have bought a smith and wesson or anything else
Robert Keahey wrote: March 23, 2013
I bought a brand new 380 revolver ,to everyone and Taraus . This gun is not worth a plug nickel whoever thought of this gun art to be fired!!!! It will not fire and taraus gun company will not answer telephone or email or fax! Don't nobody buy taraus guns they are not worth a plug nickel. And I am going to do free advertisement on the back of my pickup truck to warn everybody not to buy taraus firearms!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Eldon Whitaker wrote: January 31, 2013
Just purchased a m380 for 240 new amazing what is avaible when all the popular guns get bought up. Love it can consistly hit a pop can at 7 yards.
jim wrote: January 27, 2013
say what you want and beleave , but with the right belt and holster you can carry concealed 95% of all handguns .
Pat wrote: January 18, 2013
I just purchased the M380 mini Taurus. Yea, the trigger takes 2 fingers to pull BUT I won't accidentally shoot myself! I am 57 year old female and never owned or shot a gun in my life. I love this little gun. It fits my hand perfectly and with little recoil, it is fun to shoot. I wanted something that I would not be afraid of or afraid to use and this is it! I really like it alot.
Pete wrote: December 31, 2012
I purchased the M380 mini. I made the mistake of not dry firing it at the dealers. When I got home I was amazed at the very high trigger pull. I contacted Taurus. I was informed the pull was 11 pounds!!! Try holding the Mini on target while overcomming 11 pounds of pull on the ball of you finger. Rapid fire is not possible. I bought it in late November. Anybody want to buy a gun????
Greg wrote: December 09, 2012
I think your Final Comments sum Taurus as a company. They seem to think of everything. Taurus is easily the most forward thinking LARGE firearms manufacture in the world today.
Charles wrote: July 25, 2012
Taurus offered and may still offer a revolver for the 9mm round. Very similar to this except my example does not have a bobbed hammer. FWIW I carried a Taurus 5-shot hammer less lightweight .38 Special for several years and now carry the Ruger LCR in .38 Special.
Mobius wrote: May 08, 2012
Got a SW Airlight wheelgun for my wife but even after some gunsmithing the trigger is too stiff for her. Looking into the 380 here as an option because I have a Ruger LCP 380. By the way, forget those expensive belt pouches for concealed carry and check out some of the ones made for Smartphones. I bought a Proporta Universal Cordura belt holster for less than $10. Fits my LCP nicely and even has extra pockets for spare magazines or whatever.
AutogunNY wrote: April 29, 2012
...the best self defense piece, is the one you have with you...my better half is 5'2" and 110lbs, she shies away from the .38spl. recoil. I think the .380 Mini is a great idea, (so far). I can't wait to try one out.
Joseph Longo wrote: April 25, 2012
What is a good iwb tuckable holster for the m380 revolver. I love this gun just need a holster
Joseph Longo wrote: April 25, 2012
What is a good iwb tuckable holster for the m380 revolver. I love this gun just need a holster
Bolweevil wrote: March 26, 2012
The .380 out of a 4"+- barrel has the same muzle energy as a .38spcl out of a snubbie. So this thing is less, if you're counting. This one would go bang every time tho, unlike some .380 autos.
I would think Fed. Exp. FMJ +p would be the way to go here. Yes alloy frame would be nice, but
you could'nt wear this thing out running a box a week thru it, and your woman would appreciate the help of the stl frame w/the recoil. Somebody here remarked on the accuracy of the .380 as wanting. I don't think so. Superb accuracy in fact. I'd take this in a heartbeat over some silly little rimfire. Having said that, we all know that nothing beats a 230gr. FMJ .45 moving anywhere above 750FPS for reliability and effect, aye? A 180gr. .40 anywhere over 900FPS works almost every time as well. At any rate, I'm gonna check one of these out for summer casual. ~:-)
walkin' trails wrote: March 04, 2012
I never had much use for the. 380 because bullets were a lot more expensive clmpare to. 38 or 9mm, and accuracy sucked in anything I ever shot. It should be noted that the military didn't get into any large scale,long term CQB engagements until years after adopting the 9MM so its shortcomings in FMJ configuration didn't appear until this past decade. I don't imagine 40 ball is alm that much better. Modern HP ammo in 9 and. 38 have made them perform so much better, but everything I've read about. 380 is that HP expansion is still not that reliable. If a .380 worked for someone trying to lawfully defend themselves, that is great. I'll still stick with something bigger.
Iraqivet wrote: February 26, 2012
Taurus is my carry piece most days.I have Two N.A.A.minis in .22LR and .22Mag for very conceled carry,but I prefer the Taurus 709 Slim.The polymer/stainless 709 has adjustable sights and a manual safety.My Glock in an inside the pants holster has me wondering !! The 709 Slim has not hiccuped with factory ammo,or reloads both mild and hot.The 9mm may not be the best defense round but that 1911 in the safe doesn't help in tough times.Besides the military is forced to use FMJ rounds,not the quality Hollowpoint +P or Hydrashocks available to the public.It all comes down to practice with your carry gun,with flashlights,no lights and low light.Shoot often,feel confident,and help suport the ammo manufacturers in this tough economy.
Howard M. Kjos wrote: February 17, 2012
What barrel lengths does the 380 c0me with? I would like about a 4 inch barrel
Mack Missiletoe wrote: February 14, 2012
No no no! I want a revolver in .32 H&R Magnum sporting adjustable iron sights. It should have a very small frame since the cartridge is smaller than .38 and also no under barrel lug as it is ugly to me, unless it is a heavy-recoiling revolver. Make one in SA and another in DA. I'd love a Ruger Bearcat in .32 H&R Magnum (5-shot) and also a Ruger Single six (6-shot). Thanks! :D
Gary wrote: February 09, 2012
SSG Rock asks a very important question: How does barrel length affect velocity? Shortening a .357 Magnum barrel can quickly turn it into a .38 Special. Shortening a .38 Special barrel can turn it into, well, wishful thinking. Reloaders, with chronographs, can fine-tune their loads and come up with the best combination available. Others are at the mercy of the ammunition manufacturers and their optimistic advertising. If you have access to a chronograph, you owe it to yourself to check out your real-world velocity and see if your defensive choice is still credible. Here is a site that will keep you entertained for quite a while. It is called Ballistics by the Inch and will give you an education about the relationship of barrel length and velocity, cylinder gap, and actual ballistics from a wide sampling of guns. Enjoy! http://www.ballisticsbytheinch.com/index.html
Pat B wrote: February 08, 2012
The one draw back to the jag wear-like conceals is that some target such protuberances on ones belt for theft since, as you point out, most carry some form of costly electronics within similar belt-mounted cases - such thefts are common within shopping malls here in sunny, scenic Detroit. And they'll put up quite a fight to get it off of you. Tough to draw your defensive piece while the perp's hanging off of it :o)
SSG Rock wrote: February 08, 2012
I am befuddled as tio why they didn't go with an alloy or scadium frame if they were looking for light/compact. That would really help sell the trade-off of using a puny round. has anyone done ballistics comparisons w/.38 snubbies? A lot of the .38 advantage is lost with a short barrel.
Gary wrote: February 07, 2012
If recoil is a problem, then a .380 or a 9mm certainly beats throwing rocks. But what I am hearing is that "It is so small and cute and it fits in my pocket." These small guns, et al., have become a fashion accessory rather than a serious problem solver! Now I know that concealment, without a shirt or coat covering a holster, is the problem here and if you could make a .40 or .45 disappear you would gladly opt for more power. So here is how you hide your weapon in plain sight. http://www.jagwear.com/jagwr2-3.htm The only "catch" is that they have a pull cord but if you attach a key ring to the cord it looks like that is what it is for. I have used one of these for years with my Kahr P40 and nobody has ever given it a look. Like the ad says, everybody has a phone or some electronic device on their belt these days. Another option is this: http://www.tommysgunpack.com/PhotoGallery.asp?ProductCode=1 Where I live (Colorado) tummy packs are so common you look naked with out one. And notice that these, unlike most others, do not have a tattle-tale draw string. I have two of these, one for my Ruger Alaskan .454 and another for my Taurus .41 Titanium Tracker. So now you have two choices for carrying an adult weapon: a "formal" leather Jagwear or a "casual" nylon Tommy's.
James P wrote: February 07, 2012
Its true like the 5.56 the 9mm for combat is not any good(the wars in Iraq and afgan has taught us that) but any gun is better than no gun, and options are nice. That being said the price is high comparable to an auto, again its an Option. Just cause you wouldnt carry it, would you want to be shot by it? Not I.
Gary wrote: February 07, 2012
For information on the military replacing the 9mm: http://www.armytimes.com/news/2011/08/army-pistols-with-a-shot-at-replacing-m9-82811w/ For information on the FBI replacing the 9mm: http://www.firearmstactical.com/pdf/fbi_10mm_notes.pdf For the straight skinny on stopping power: http://www.gunthorp.com/Terminal%20Ballistics%20as%20viewed%20in%20a%20morgue.htm
Ed wrote: February 07, 2012
@Gary
Check out North American Arms.
http://www.northamericanarms.com/
I have one and it is very reliable and inexpensive.
MattO wrote: February 07, 2012
I had a Taurus .38 special I really liked. I traded it for a Taurus PT 24/7 I enjoy. I also carry a Taurus .380 and was looking at getting a Bond Arms .45. I am rethinking mow. I like the looks of this gun.
LuAnn Smith wrote: February 07, 2012
I owned the Taurus Snub nose chrome plated in 1985 it was great I may buy another !Love Taurus !
Reason wrote: February 07, 2012
The 380 isnt the worst thing you can carry but I agree with people saying to much money for to little gun. I own a taurus judge with 3 inch barrel and cylinder that shoots either 45 lc or 410 ga and only paid about twenty bucks more for it brand new.
Cymond wrote: February 06, 2012
15.5 ounces is disappointing for a gun this size. Seriously Taurus, you can shave an ounce or two from that.
Northman wrote: February 06, 2012
As one of the previous commenters stated, Taurus already makes a small revolver that shoots 32 Hornady Magnums. They also make a 6-shot 327 Magnum small frame revolver that is quite snappy and more powferful IMHO than a 380.
John wrote: February 06, 2012
GREAT DEFENEIVE ROUND. Uh huh. Even after spellcheck it's still underpowered.
Sacorbi wrote: February 06, 2012
Everyone listen to Gary. Only big guns can wound or kill people. Too many people buy and try to use more fun than they need or can safely handle because of that kind of ignorant advise.
Isaac Arnold wrote: February 06, 2012
I would have liked to have seen some muzzle velocities. Given the barrel/cylinder gap and the short barrel length, I bet the bullets are moving slow. I say .38 "Mo Bettah."
Jim wrote: February 06, 2012
My wife cannot handle or will even shoot a caliber above 9mm. So if I can find a wheelie than is not a 22 I'm game. I carry the Ruger LCR 357. I used 38+P for target practice and she will not shoot it. So I commend Taurus for this wheelie if it can hold up. We own two of their 9mm's and are happy with them except they are to heavy to carry as a ccw.
james wrote: February 06, 2012
I am in firm belief bigger is better. But no matter how big the weapon is if you can't shoot it then get something smaller. Yes the military is unhappy with the 9mm but you are talking about shooting against people with gear on and hardball ammo. I don't care the caliber as long as you are proficient with it. Dead is still dead wether its a 22 or a 500 s&w magnum. Learn to hit your target. I think this revolver is good for a women just learning to shoot.
zoics wrote: February 06, 2012
ammo is expensive - why bother!
Eric wrote: February 06, 2012
its not a "J" frame beceause it isnt a smith J is a designation of size from smith and wesson. The price is suggested actual gun store sales price is usualy less.
Steven wrote: February 06, 2012
to Gary, what military ever declared that the 9mm was a disappointment? The US Armed forces adopted the Beretta M9 nearly 30 years ago. I know the feds work slow, but 27 years is a long time to continue using a caliber that is such a huge disappointment.
John wrote: February 06, 2012
Why .380? Ammo is hard to get, and there are vastly better cartridges far more suited to use in a revolver. Silly idea! Why not another .38, or .32 H&R? Personally I'd opt for a .327 Federal in a revolver. Keep the .380 for small autos. Better yet, 9mm for a small auto. Guess the .380 fad just escapes me.
Joe wrote: February 06, 2012
For any confused gun snobs out there, Taurus guns are made with Beretta tooling. So its basically a beretta with a different name. Google it if you dont believe me. Taurus provides great firearms!
jim wrote: February 06, 2012
as an ex-LA County Paramedic, I have seen more people killed by a 22 caliber than any other
Karl wrote: February 06, 2012
"Anyone want to bet this won't be in the Taurus catlog for more than a year or two...?"
I'll take that bet! I've already seen one in the display case at my local gun shop!
Snarky357 wrote: February 05, 2012
Not exactly my first choice, but remember Taurus is a Brazilian company. Many South American countries (and maybe European?) limit civilians to .380/9mm Browning.
Wayne wrote: February 03, 2012
I paid much less for a Taurus 357 revolver. I think it's too high.
Jake wrote: February 03, 2012
Adjustable sights, Why? how about no sights 1.75 inch barrel. Who uses sights in close combat?
Jake wrote: February 03, 2012
It would appear a lot of development effort went into a round already formatted in other concealed 'weapons' .380?
I think it's a bit pricey for what it offers the shooter ....I KNOW! how about a .38 'J' frame?
mitch wrote: February 02, 2012
I am one of those revolver guys. I own autos, but tend to enjoy wheelies more. I'm always glad to see more options on the market.
John wrote: February 02, 2012
No matter how small the gun, or "weak" the cartridge - the gun you are carrying when you need it is far better than the heavier, more "powerful" gun you left in the safe at home.
At the distances most self-defense shootings occur, accuracy and rapidity of repeat shots are far more important than individual bullet effect, so the small gun that one can shoot well and quickly is better than the large gun one may fumble with, or be unable to recover adequately from the first shot's recoil/blast. Most defensive civilian defensive gun carriers are NOT "gun people", just like most cops are not, and they don't worship at the altar of John Browning. Any new gun on the market that gets more good people carrying is a good thing.
ED650 wrote: February 02, 2012
THE 380 IS A GREAT DEFENEIVE ROUND. MY PERSONAL FAV IS THE EXTREME SHOCK ENHANCED PENETRATION ROUND (EPR). IT WIL STOP A 400LB BOAR WITH ONE SHOT,DRT,A SHOULDER SHOT @ 15 YDS. I KNOW FROM AN UNWANTED EXPERIENCE. MOST DEFENSIVE SHOTS ARE FIRED AT LESS THAN 7 FT AND IF IT WILL STOP A BOAR @ 15 YDS ...I KNOW IT WILL STOP A BAD GUY
Norm wrote: February 02, 2012
Taurus sells another small revolver that has considerably more punch, without moving up to the 38 special. It is the model 731 in 32 Hornady magnum, and it is a six shot.
Jim wrote: February 02, 2012
I'm at a loss to understand why the ejector system developed by S&W for the 9mm model 547 has not been more widely used for shooting auto-ammo in revolvers. This design does not require moon/star clips and seems very reliable. You can load from a speed-loader and eject with one push on the rod. Would appreciate comments on this question.
Jerry in AZ wrote: February 02, 2012
I'm not familuar with the Taurus Security System, but ANY non-removable security is a turn off for me. I hate paying for the R&D and manufacturing of someting that I don't want. Second, the bobbed hammer is also a turn off.
Gary wrote: February 02, 2012
My problem with the glorification of small-caliber handguns for self defense is that the less educated might buy one simply because some "expert" wrote "The Taurus M380 IB Mini .380 is a light, compact, reliable defensive revolver" and "A snub-nosed revolver in .380 may not be a defensive option you would have thought of, but Taurus did." Do you notice a pattern when it comes to the word "defensive?" There should be a warning at the bottom of the article stating: the FBI gave up on the .38 Special +P and 9mm and the military has declared the 9mm a huge disappointment. And to be aware that the .380 is even less powerful.
ecovelli wrote: February 02, 2012
I once got a lecture from an NYPD officer about how stupid the department was for going with the 9mm and how the .45 1911 is the ONLY defensive handgun. When I asked him how he carries it during certain situations off-duty, he said he has a little .32.
The lesson is, you carry the biggest caliber you can shoot and carry comfortably at a particular time. That might be a .22 one day or it might be a .45.
I have elderly patients who would have trouble shooting a .38 special, so this might be a good alternative for them. Some people don't like the imprint of a J-Frame, so they might like this.
Also, don't dismiss the .380 with a good load, it is a very decent round.
Reader wrote: February 02, 2012
I don't think Taurus or the writer is saying this is the best way to go. They're trying to provide EVERYONE with a carry option. Not everyone can handle large calibers, and a small gun is better than no gun.
Gary wrote: February 01, 2012
The cheerleaders at all the gun zines are doing their best to brain wash their readers into believing that any gun capable of making a sound resembling "bang" is suitable for self defense. Power no longer matters. Assuming that is true, why would anybody go to all the trouble of lugging around a .380 and putting up with all that recoil when a shirt-pocket-sized .22 short rim fire would blow away any bad guy that ever tried to ruin your day? After all, more people have been killed with the .22 than everything else and they do go bang. Now, if only some manufacturer would come out with a .22 micro rim fire in a weapon that fits into the watch pocket of my jeans, I could trade off that over-sized, over-powered .22 short. And to think that we once believed in some guy named Jeff Cooper.
Pete wrote: February 01, 2012
Anyone want to bet this won't be in the Taurus catlog for more than a year or two...?
Comments
ADD YOUR COMMENT
Enter your comments below, they will appear within 24 hours
56 Responses to Taurus M380 IB Mini Revolver (Page 2)