Rifles > News

Shooting with Today's Top Snipers

Learn how long-range warriors take the fight to the enemy.

4/25/2012

Peering across a wooded valley near Lake Superior, I strained my eyes to discern five metallic targets through early morning fog. The closest target laser-ranged at 744 yards through my Bushnell Fusion binocular, with the farthest nearly twice that distance. Most riflemen would stand little chance of scoring hits at such ranges. But with me were three of the finest combat snipers in the world, each a record-setting veteran of Iraq or Afghanistan. And each, like me, was firing a long-range precision rifle.

Beside me lay former U.S. Marine sniper Steve Reichert, credited with the longest kill in Iraq using a .50 BMG. Next to him was U.S. Army sniper Jim Gilliland, who bested an Iraqi insurgent sniper with the farthest confirmed 7.62x51 mm NATO kill in Iraq or Afghanistan. Our third sniper was the legendary Canadian, Robert Furlong, the .50 BMG world-record holder for his sniper work in Afghanistan.

As the first to fire, I started by lasing the range. I then consulted my 3x5-inch ballistic notecard, and mentally adjusted for wind drift, ambient temperature and up/down angle to fine-tune my target knobs. My first shot struck solidly, demonstrating that classic ballistic computations remain true and trustworthy.

Next to fire was Reichert, who, like me, had a bolt-action .338 Lapua Mag.—his a Desert Tactical Arm bullpup and mine a Savage Model 110 BA chassis rifle. Unlike me, however, Reichert noted the lased range, the ambient temperature, the wind’s direction and velocity, our elevation, the up/down angle to the target, and then his barrel length and his scope height above the bore, tapping all this data into a handheld computer, which instantly yielded target knob settings. His first shot was very close but a miss.

Had my ballistic notecard triumphed over Reichert’s computer? Hardly. Once the Marine sniper vet input a correction for that first shot, he was “on,” and he never missed thereafter, and I mean never, no matter the distance or up/down angle. His shooting was phenomenal.

As Reichert had demonstrated, and Gilliland and Furlong as well, today’s best snipers are scientifically minded as well as superb shooters, exploiting technology to the maximum to eliminate threats at ever-greater distances. This is what brought us together—their state-of-the-art techniques and knowledge—to film an instructional DVD for Paladin Press entitled “Ultimate Sniper III.” Not only were they a pleasure to work with, but they proved pure professionals, with no egos or false humility, just a shared enthusiasm for shooting and perfecting their craft.

Jim Gilliland’s insight on powder temperature is an excellent example. In Iraq he learned to “cook” his rounds—that is, to set cartridges in direct sunlight to raise the powder temperature and boost muzzle velocity, thereby stretching his range. But he learned that trick after his record 7.62 mm shot, which was recently recreated for a History Channel documentary. While his infantry unit advanced through Ramadi, an insurgent hotbed in Iraq’s Sunni Triangle, Gilliland’s sniper team covered them from a rooftop. Suddenly his radio crackled, reporting that an enemy sniper had just shot an American soldier. In a fourth-floor hospital window some 12 blocks away, his spotter detected the sniper—it was 1,375 yards, far beyond the typical range of Gilliland’s rifle. But there wasn’t time to rush down to the street, sprint three blocks and climb another building. It was a desperate situation; he had to fire immediately before another American was hit. Applying all the dope he knew about his 7.62 mm NATO cartridge’s 175-grain bullet, he cranked his Leupold M3A scope’s elevation to the maximum, then held over as best he could estimate, squeezed—and dropped the SVD-armed insurgent sniper. It was the longest-range 7.62 mm kill in Iraq or Afghanistan. Later, Gilliland learned that the insurgent sniper had killed a close friend of his, a fellow unit sergeant.

The new DVD includes enemy sniper ruses and ruthlessness, to which Gilliland can attest. “Enemy soldiers have no morality, no ethics,” he noted. “They have never heard of the Geneva Convention, they will never comply with its content.” He illustrated that, recalling a night his sniper team secretly surveilled an often used improvised explosive device (IED) site. Acting as the spotter, in the darkness he observed a burqa-clad woman loitering in a nearby alleyway. Eventually she left the shadows for the empty road and began digging where a previous IED had been concealed, obviously to plant a fresh one. While Gilliland spotted, his teammate ended her effort with one shot. With the coming of daylight Gilliland dreaded checking the woman’s body and the civilian outrage it might incite. Imagine his relief, then, when he found that the burqa-clad “woman” sported a full-length beard.

No less insightful is Canadian sniper veteran Robert Furlong. After taking turns firing my Savage .338 Lapua Mag. rifle, we talked about extreme-range applications of the .50 BMG and .338 Lapua Mag. cartridges. He emphasized, a sniper must not expect single-round kills at great range. “At extreme range,” he said, “your goal is to get enough [well-placed] rounds out there that you’re bound to hit something.” His observation reminded me of Carlos Hathcock, who once told me it required multiple shots to make his world-record 2,500-yard, .50-cal. kill. “Nobody records the misses,” he joked.


Hathcock’s record stood for 33 years, until early 2002, when Furlong’s Canadian sniper team was supporting U.S. Army Special Forces during Operation Anaconda. “A group of three al-Qaeda fighters were moving into a mountainside position in Afghanistan’s Shah-i-Kot Valley at about 9,000 feet above sea level,” Furlong recalled. He watched them through a spotting scope. “They were walking, maybe thinking this was their lucky day. It wasn’t.” His rifle was a .50 BMG McMillan TAC-50, designated the Long-Range Sniper Weapon, or LRSW, by the Canadian Army. Having expended his Canadian-issue ammo, he’d borrowed some hotter American rounds—Hornady .50 BMG ammunition with 750-grain A-MAX bullets. Furlong knew the maximum planning range for his .50 cal. was 2,190 yards—but this target was 2,700 yards, or one-and-a-half miles away. Furlong laid a half-dozen rounds in the sun, knowing hotter powder would boost his range. Settling behind his rifle, his first round missed an enemy fighter carrying an RPK light machinegun. The second round nicked the gunner’s rucksack, enough to fine-tune Furlong’s lead and hold. The third shot flipped over the al-Qaeda fighter. “I knew I hit him,” Furlong said. The rest, as they say, is history.

An interesting point, we agreed, was that both the .338 Lapua Mag. and .50 BMG cartridges go subsonic well before 2,700 yards—meaning an enemy could not hear a bullet’s “crack,” only perhaps an indistinct whistle. At extreme range, that enemy soldier also would not likely hear the sniper’s muzzle blast so he’d have no idea where the shot originated. This brought us to the subject of suppressors.

Not many years ago, it was believed that only by employing subsonic ammunition was it worth using a suppressed rifle. But low-velocity projectiles offered insufficient terminal ballistics—essentially, you would be firing a pistol round. So why use a suppressor?

Experiences in Iraq and Afghanistan have demonstrated that a sniper can employ normal loads and still benefit from a suppressor. At typical engagement distances, the enemy may hear your bullet’s “crack,” but he cannot connect it to a muffled muzzle blast. Thus, suppressors have become standard issue for Army and Marine snipers, and both Gilliland and Reichert employed suppressed rifles in our film. In fact, Gilliland told me he often used a suppressed 5.56x45 mm NATO rifle in Iraq, firing Mark 262, Black Hills 77-grain Open-Tipped Match (OTM) ammunition. With this combination, he recorded kills up to 750 meters away, a good 200 meters beyond that rifle’s range when firing standard 62-grain loads. During our filming, he used a suppressed Seekins Precision Custom 5.56x45 mm NATO rifle and fired the Black Hills ammunition with considerable accuracy. We also fired a DPMS 5.56x45 mm NATO Mini-SASS rifle, and Reichert fitted a suppressor on his Desert Tactical Arms .338 Lapua Mag. rifle.

1   2    NEXT >>

Share |

Comments

ADD YOUR COMMENT

Enter your comments below, they will appear within 24 hours


Your Name


Your Email


Your Comment

16 Responses to Shooting with Today's Top Snipers

Peter wrote:
July 10, 2012

Hi Courtenay I am also so proud of our fellow snipers and their abilities to save numerous Americans. Thanks for your comments. t

Joseph Harter wrote:
July 05, 2012

Every one sems t othink the only important factor to be concerned about is distance. I grant you that it is very imprtant , but WIND is also very important. Being able to read the wind and crrect for it is just asimportant. I have watched and coached shooters in strong cross winds. Winds strong enough to blow a shot completly off a regulation size teget at six hunded yards. don't frget the old rule ofthumb. "The angle of the dangle divided by four, gives you the wind speed in miles per hour."

Graham wrote:
May 17, 2012

I loved the article and applaud all these brave men. I am wondering why Maj.Plaster doesn't mention Cpl.Craig Harrison and his kill at 2707yds. in Afghanistan.It makes me believe the article was writen before Nov.2009.

Mack Missiletoe wrote:
May 10, 2012

Yah um... I'ma get me a scope next. A decent scope for the .22 Magnum. I gotta... never shot with a scope. It is 'Time'. The zombys our soldiers fight... well, they shoot back. So--much thanks to our soldiers! I often wonder how I'd do if I joined the Army meself. It could happen, y'know. Another war... An oh-fish-eee-yal 'Draft'. If it does, I hope America comes together. We are made of so many different people, and it sure would be beautiful if we worked together to destroy evil. Maybe it's not that simple, but basic. What about you? I heard some of them Alsqueakda don't like close-up fighting. As in they're cowards with cheap guns and no brains. I know there are some strong ones, but strapping a bomb to myself and pressing the big red button for a bunch of virgins (72) whose existence is proven only with illegal drugs... well that's got coward written all over it. And I lol@that... lol@ lol@ lol@ I'd rather die fighting honorably for the women of America than for these fake '72 virgins'. Them virgins wouldn't sleep with the fools anyways, they'd press their own buttons Just ain't honorable. Missiletoe OUT

Navy Flyer wrote:
May 03, 2012

With all due respect to MAJ Plaster and the Top Shots in his article (and taking nothing away from Furlong's or Reichert's accomplishments: I did see their exploits recounted in the History Channel episode mentioned -- it was awesome!), let us not forget that, according to Charles Henderson's account "Marine Sniper: 93 Confirmed Kills", Carlos Hathcock made his famous 2,500-yard, .50 BMG kill NOT with the modern bolt action or repeating action weapons being fielded by sniper teams today, such as the Barrett or McMillan; but rather, Hatchcock's kill was made with the only crew-served, portable weapon firing the .50 BMG of that day: the venerable M2 Browning .50 Caliber Machine Gun, or "Ma Deuce"! This weapon was NOT designed for "minute-of-angle" fire, but rather, to lay down an arching, cone of fire to interdict opposing forces, who perhaps were in defilade. NOR does the M2 have the precisely manufactured, let-off trigger of a target rifle; it's really more of an ON/OFF switch! A precise sniper weapon like those available today, it is NOT. So, for Plaster to say that GYSGT Hathcock's record "stood for 33 years", until bested by Furlong and Reichert, is certainly overstating the case, and compares apples to oranges. Indeed, "Hats Off" to Plaster's Top Shots and their accomplishments, but I say that Carlos Hathcock's record still stands, and cannot be broken until bested using the "Ma Deuce". I met the Gunny in '87 or '88 at the Navy East Coast Matches in Dam Neck, VA, and count myself blessed to have been able to shake his hand before his passing to thank him personally for his accomplishments in "The 'Nam". A great man, a great American, and still standing today, a great record!

Jimmy Young wrote:
May 02, 2012

My hat is off to all our Armed Forces that have gone in harmes way fo my freedom to own almost any firearm I want.

Paul McKeever wrote:
April 30, 2012

Why is GySgt. Hathcock's record considered broken? The reason I question is: GySgt. Hathcock made his famous shot using a M2 .50 caliber Heavy Machine Gun (HMG) with a comercial hunting scope using standard ball ammunition not a specifically designed, specially manufactured, precision machined, sniper rifle outfitted with most technologically advanced specialty optics, firing specialty ammunition currently used by military snipers. GySgt. Hathcock had to set the head space and timing, grip the spade handles and depress the butterfly trigger with both thumbs so carefully that the automatic weapon would only fire a single round at a time. Most LRSW's are either bolt action or semi automatic , have a fitted stock or pistol grip allowing a single finger to squeeze the trigger giving the shooter much more control. GySgt. Hathcock from a seated position fired a heavy machine gun mounted on a tripod with a T&E and a commercially produced hunting scope, preventing him from achieving any real weapon/body/sight-target alignment unlike the shoulder fired rifles with bipods,stock rests, shoulder/cheek rests and optics of todays weapon systems. Lastly, the M2 HMG that GySgt. Hathcock used, was a mass produced, Battalion stock weapon, most likely a WW II or Korean War era weapon, probably produced several decades before his shot. It was not specifically fitted or tuned to him. All the maintenance and cleaning of this weapon was performed by someone else, more than likely a PFC or LCpl, not the sniper, his spotter or a sniper specific armorer like todays LRSW's. Today's shooters Absolutely Deserve the credit they have so skillfully earned. Their proficiency and daring have definately earned them a place in the record books. However dismissing GySgt. Hathcock's accomplishment seems wrong. Shouldn't there be seperate record categories, one for rifles and another for HMG's? This way the comparison will be apples to apples not apples to oranges. Semper Fidelis

Dave wrote:
April 28, 2012

The most recent longest confirmed kill was by a Brittish sniper, however, the shot was made with a .338 LM and not 7.62

Alex wrote:
April 27, 2012

you forgot that the longest confirmed kill shot in Afghanistan was made by a British Sniper (using 7.62mm NATO) shortly after the Canadian made his .50 cal shot.

Lenny wrote:
April 27, 2012

Well-written and informative article. Thank you all for your service to our country, and to the cause of Freedom.

Robert McCabe wrote:
April 27, 2012

Awesome article!

Phil Conklin wrote:
April 27, 2012

Really great article! I teach long range hunting, out to 1000 yards and have shot farther than that, most everything goes south after 1000! It is great to watch the shows about snipers and I can truely appreciate the difficulty of those longer shots. Would love to shoot with those guys someday!

Captain Jack wrote:
April 27, 2012

Thankfully equipment has come a long way since my days in Viet Nam. Upon returning home I purchased a Rem 700 BDl-- same action used in my day. I still have it and these old eyes can still reach out and touch someone at 350 yards- far from what these heros can do! I'll keep it, my 12 ga, and carry weapons until I die. I'm a strong proponent of practice and stock LOTS of ammo!

robert hogue wrote:
April 27, 2012

Semper Fi

Chad wrote:
April 27, 2012

It is the man who carries and knows how to use a rifle whom has the greatest effect on morale- enemy and friendly.

Courtenay wrote:
April 26, 2012

Guys I am not from the US but I am glad and proud of men being men, practicing their craft with diligence and purpose. With knowing that with this commendable skill you have saved lives and defended freedom. May God bless you and bless your hands and eyes. I know nothing about firearms but I feel a lot safer to know that there guys like you out there.