Rifles > Accessories

The Real Scoop on Sound Suppression (Page 2)

Hollywood has done a terrific job at placing suppressors in a negative context.

How Do I Purchase One?
Along with intentional, and politically motivated, distortions about the use of sound suppressors, there is an enormous amount of bad information in circulation regarding their legalities. Under Federal law they are perfectly legal. They are purchased by a lawful owner or dealer in National Firearms Act firearms and, if you live in a state that allows their possession and use, it is a simple and straightforward process that will test your patience more than it will affect your wallet. (Since we are only discussing Federal law, please research the laws in your state for specifics.)

A good comparison to use in the process of buying and owning any NFA firearm, sound suppressor included, is the purchase of an automobile. When you buy a new car or truck you fill out a title application that is submitted, and a new title is generated reflecting you as the lawful owner. There is a one-time title fee and it is never due again (unless you sell the item and the new owner pays to have the title changed to his or her name.)

There is no “Federal Silencer License” or “Annual Silencer Permit” but only this single-time transfer of title to you. The title fee (transfer fee) is $200. The price of the suppressor itself can vary from $150 to $2,000 depending on the caliber, materials and manufacturer. There are sound suppressors for every budget.

The application for purchase of a sound suppressor is referred to in the firearm industry as a “Form 4.” This form has information about the current owner and the device you are purchasing, among other things. It must be signed by your local Chief Law Enforcement Officer (CLEO) stating that you are breaking no state or local law by taking possession of the device you are buying, and it is accompanied by a few fingerprint cards and a check to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms & Explosives (BATFE) in the amount of $200.

The FBI will check your fingerprints to make sure you are eligible to own the device, the BATFE will research the device making sure it is legal and you are buying something acceptable for you to own. Upon completion the new title will be issued in your name, and the suppressor belongs to you. There are no unannounced 4 a.m. visits by federal agents demanding to see it, and no further paperwork to complete. It is just a title and nothing else.

Also, thanks to standardized threading and/or different adapters, one suppressor may be moved from one firearm to another within the owner’s possession. Depending on the model and the manufacturer’s recommendations, suppressors may also be used on a gun chambered in a different, smaller caliber.

So there you have it, far from their infamous Hollywood image. Once you sort through the misinformation out there, sound suppressors can be a real asset to responsible shooting and are actually reasonably economical to own given their advantages.

Suppressor Exploded View

<< PREV   1   2  

Share |

Comments

ADD YOUR COMMENT

Enter your comments below, they will appear within 24 hours


Your Name


Your Email


Your Comment

19 Responses to The Real Scoop on Sound Suppression (Page 2)

Gary wrote:
December 20, 2012

I really hate California :( Quit Complaining

Daniel Boone wrote:
November 16, 2012

Of course I live far far outside my city limits. I've spent many a early morning getting rid of fruit rats and gophers on my estate. My sound suppressed 22 cal. firearms are more quiet than my hunting air rifles.

Mack Missiletoe wrote:
October 15, 2012

I think the tax stamp price should be adjusted to $25.00 that way we all are happy. When I think of having to pay $200 plus the cost of the suppressor I am often turned off. I was planning on getting a suppressor for my .308 but ...I had to sell it :( I don't think it would have been 'quiet' but I know it would have been more pleasant to shoot--not just for me but also my neighbors. Funny thing, the gun shop is selling my rifle for more $$$ now than I originally paid for it! What a fail on my part... haha Good day!

Paul Atlanta wrote:
October 10, 2012

Also, I would love to have one but not at the expense of govt. fee or having my name and address in a database. We all recall what happened to the database of gun owners in Germany in 1933-34

Paul in Atlanta wrote:
October 10, 2012

Excellent article, Jeff, but I have a better reason why your suppressed groups are tighter then unsuppressed on P76: it's called "barrel mass and length." Muzzle flip is the result of torque applied by the equal and opposite force down the barrel.. which translates into twisting moment because the barrel axis is not the same as the axis of hold. The more mass in the barrel,the further it is from the pivot point close to the top of the wrist, the less "flip". Even my 3.5 inch barrel Kahr P9 covert 3.5 inch barrel and one ounce more of weight shoots tighter groups than 3 inch barreled PM9. The moment arm of an 8 inch suppressor way out there is controlling your barrel nicely. Not vibrations in the barrel.

Dabe wrote:
October 06, 2012

Wisco is correct, there are actually two other ways to buy a silencer. 1. Living Trust, 2. Corporation. Either way there is no Law Enforcement approval needed. In addition, any "trustee" in the trust or "officer" of the Corporation can use/posses the silencer. The way this article describes, only the person on the Tax Stamp can technically use/posses the silencer.

Sage wrote:
September 28, 2012

This is a good article. I have formed a facebook group to support the idea of completely deregulating firearm suppressors. It likely won't happen soon, but it would be nice to get more people talking about it. Feel free to join the group if you are interested.

Al wrote:
September 27, 2012

If you have a CCW license, do you need to pay the $200 background check fee?

Wisco wrote:
September 26, 2012

If you set up an NFA Trust (around $300) a person cam avoid any notification of local law enforcement, as well as avoiding the FBI fingerprint requirement for individuals. The current wait is approximately 6 months - due to the Obama Administration's intentional delay tactics. Buy them now; if Obama is re-elected, he WILL go after items like these

BigKid wrote:
September 26, 2012

In Europe, you have a hard time getting a firearm, but not a suppressor. In the USA it is just the opposite. The high cost and hoops to get a suppressor in the USA is just another form of Gun Control. Just Not Necessary.

MD Willington wrote:
September 25, 2012

The Following States Allow Private Ownership Of Suppressors: AL, AR, AK, AZ, CO, CT, FL, GA, ID, IN, KS, KY, LA, ME, MD,MI, MS, MT, ND, NE, NV, NH, NM, NC, OH, OK, OR, PA, SC, SD, TN, TX, UT, VA, WA, WI, WV, And WY. They require a tax stamp and background check that takes quite some time at present.

roadie wrote:
September 25, 2012

I was reading they are legal for hunting in Texas, but you have to go through BATFE to get them.

Gary wrote:
September 24, 2012

Great primer on suppressors but there was no mention of the other methods of purchasing that does not require fingerprints or sign off by chief Leo ( a lot of whom refuse to) I do specific trusts for this purpose here in Florida

ArmsVault.com wrote:
September 21, 2012

You mean to tell me that Hollywood has been spreading untruths about guns?!?!

Vince wrote:
September 21, 2012

As gadget said, semantics do make a difference. The acronym AR DOES NOT stand for Assault Rifle. When Armalite came out with their plastic and aluminum rifle they named it as the Armalite Rifle. That's where the term AR came from.

Rich Holland wrote:
September 21, 2012

Can average civilians own one, and if so which states allow them? I would like to add one to my 300 win mag for night hog hunting, I live in Louisiana.

Gadget wrote:
September 20, 2012

In Britain, they are required on guided hunts. It's a workplace safety issue in consideration of the guide. Makes sense. And please, no firearms enthusiast should _ever_ call them a "silencer." As we've said, they don't "silence" anything. It's just a movie word, or a gun-grabber's word - precisely the reason that we shouldn't use it! And yes, semantics DO make a difference. There's no such thing as a modern "assault rifle" either, remember? They're suppressors, period. If we could get in front of the grabbers and get to folks before they're scared by our lying opposition, we'd be much better off.

Czechnology wrote:
September 19, 2012

Unfortunately, in many european countries sound supressors are also treated as "spy gear": Austria - not allowed Czech Republic - not allowed Slovakia - not allowed Germany - special permit required Switzerland - not allowed

brent salladay wrote:
September 18, 2012

my tac 65 suppreso on a p22 walther is amazinly quiet more so than a co2 pistol no joke