Handguns > News

Pocket-Pistol Lessons (Page 2)

Little guns can be effective self-defense tools, but they require extra commitment.

In order to get your hand on the pistol, you will have to clear a covering garment, pocket, waist pack or purse. Here again, a pocket pistol’s small size can cause complications, because it can become “lost” under a heavy coat or in a pouch. Weare’s recommendation to be deliberate especially applies to getting the things that conceal the handgun out of the way. Use enough force to provide plenty of clearance for your shooting hand to access the firearm. You already have less gun to grab, so make sure you can get all of it. Depending on where you carry your pocket pistol, it may require more motion or effort to make it accessible than with a larger handgun carried in a conventional belt holster. Be aware that presentation could take more time with a pocket pistol, and plan accordingly.

 

Weare stresses you should never mix keys, coins, extra magazines or other items in the same pocket with your handgun as they can interfere with presentation at best or make it impossible at worst. In a stressful situation you could even mistake your cell phone for your pistol if it’s in the same pocket.

Always use your support hand to clear a covering garment or open a zipper. If you’re carrying in an ankle holster, trapping your pant leg between both hands will prevent it from binding as you pull upward. Once access to the handgun is clear, it’s important to keep your support hand and arm stationary, positioned behind or beside the firearm, as you withdraw it from the holster.

“These guns have short barrels, and if you’re not careful, you can accidentally cover yourself with the muzzle,” cautions Weare.

The same also applies to re-holstering. Never let your hand or other body part pass in front of the muzzle when placing the firearm back into the holster. While that seems easy enough to accomplish, it requires special emphasis when using a pocket holster. McNeese says to avoid trying to re-holster a handgun with the holster remaining in your pocket. The holster can shift, and you can end up pointing the firearm at your body. Removing the holster so you can work with it in front of your chest, with the muzzle of the handgun constantly pointing downrange, is the best method.

McNeese recommends to first transfer the handgun from your shooting hand to your support hand. Reach into your pocket with your shooting hand and withdraw the holster. Stage it on a nearby surface or hook it somewhere on your clothing where it is easy to reach. Return the firearm to your shooting hand. Finally, carefully use your support hand to bring the holster to the gun while keeping your fingers above or below the muzzle, which should remain parallel to the ground and pointed downrange. It’s as complicated and awkward as it sounds. Accept the compromise and proceed slowly.

Session 3: Deal With The Faults
The physical attributes that make pocket pistols so attractive for concealed carry also limit our ability to use them effectively for self-defense. First, there’s the problem with accuracy. Pocket pistols have short barrels. Short barrels have short sight radiuses. Short sight radiuses make precise aiming difficult. And it doesn’t end there. Combine a short sight radius with small sights that can be tough to discern even in broad daylight, and you’ve arrived at the perfect recipe for misalignment.

“You have a very small gun with a very short barrel. There is very little margin for error,” says Weare. Even if you manage to align the sights perfectly and keep your entire focus on that little bump near the muzzle, you can still miss. You have to maintain the handgun’s ideal relationship to the target throughout the trigger press, without introducing movement that can cause it to shift. The typically long, heavy, double-action trigger pull common to pocket pistols can make this seem impossible. Resist the urge to quickly power through the pull, and instead apply steadily increasing pressure to the trigger for what Gunsite calls the compressed surprise break. If you can have patience for your pocket pistol in just one area, this is it.

There is no secret to shooting pocket pistols accurately. “For a lot of people, a pocket pistol is only going to be effective to 5 or 7 yards,” he observes. “If you practice a lot with it, you may be able to get out to maybe 15 yards or 25. When you get to 25 yards, you’re really going to have to put a lot of stress on the sights and the trigger press. At that range, you are going to be challenged.”

The lower downrange performance levels of pocket pistol cartridges make shot placement on a threat more critical. A 90-grain, .380 ACP or 125-grain, .38 Spl. load from a pocket pistol produces roughly half the muzzle energy of a 180-grain, .40 S&W or 230-grain, .45 ACP load from a full-size handgun. Modern bullet designs make the most of every foot-pound, but the stopping power of a pocket pistol cartridge is still significantly lower. Hitting the vital areas of a deadly threat is a must when employing a pocket pistol. Even then, says Weare, it may require several rounds to stop an attacker.

“Hit ’em where it counts, as many times as it takes,” he stresses. “There’s no substitute for shot placement, especially with a pocket gun.” Remember, however, most pocket pistols have a reduced capacity of five to seven rounds. A few misses and a couple marginal hits, and you could suddenly be faced with an empty gun while still fighting for your life. Carrying a reload, whether it be an extra magazine or a speedloader, is almost as important as carrying the gun itself.

Session 4: Take Time Together
Finally, make it a priority to spend quality time with your pocket pistol at the range or in repeated dry-fire practice at home. This is the chance to work out your differences. Here’s some valuable advice gained through experience: You’re the one who will have to change, and the sooner you do, the better off you’ll be.

Take presentation, for instance. The night a criminal knocks you to the ground and pulls a knife isn’t the time to discover that you can’t reach your pocket pistol when you’re lying on your back.

Some challenges to using a pocket pistol, like trigger manipulation, will become easier to deal with the more you practice. While you may think of your pocket pistol as a backup, both McNeese and Weare recommend practicing with it as often as you would with any other handgun—if not more. Becoming complacent with your pocket pistol is a good way to make mistakes and develop bad habits, so focus on each step of the presentation sequence and every fundamental of marksmanship. Don’t assume just because you’re effective with a full-size handgun at 25 yards, it will be a cinch to get good hits with a pocket pistol at 5 yards.

Pocket pistols have a lot to offer, but they require a lot of attention in return. The more time you spend with your pocket pistol, the more intimate you’ll become with its strengths and overcome its shortcomings.

<< PREV   1   2  

Share |

Comments

ADD YOUR COMMENT

Enter your comments below, they will appear within 24 hours


Your Name


Your Email


Your Comment

20 Responses to Pocket-Pistol Lessons (Page 2)

Jim Dalton wrote:
June 12, 2013

Great Article! As a firearms instructor I can't impress enough how important it is to practice every aspect of safety, carrying, shooting and maintenance until it becomes habit. My first experience with a pocket pistol was the Ruger LCP. I immediately recognized that the extra "snap" of the recoil would require a much firmer grip. My daughter is a crack shot with my .45 XD 5" but when first put to the test with the LCP was off by 4"+. After a little instruction on using body alignment and hip placement to strengthen her grip she was back on target. With a small gun body alignment and the knowledge of using your larger lower body muscles to strengthen your grip become extremely important. Squeeze your grip harder and you will shake causing rounds to be off target. Additionally, consideration of construction materials is important as well. After getting comfortable with the LCP I opted to switch it out for a Sig P280. The weight of the metal frame helps reduce the recoil effect. Again, it's a trade-off. Grams=ounces, ounces=pounds, pounds=pain. However, after training many civilians with pocket pistols my opinion is that a metal frame in this small is a small trade off for the benefit. I just wish I would see more of my trainees at the range. It scares me and breaks my heart to see someone I trained pull a pistol from their pocket and be unable to even rack the slide because it is gummed up with lint. This tells me 3 things. 1: They didn't take my instruction to heart. 2: They have not "mated" with their firearm. 3: Their firearm is now more of a liability than an asset to their safety. I love that this article presumes that routine practice is the norm. I just wish it were true!

Martin B wrote:
June 08, 2013

Most small pocket sized guns are seriously limited in effective grip-ability, accuracy (both due to short barrel and short sight radius), and velocity of shot, as well as weight pf projectile. For this reason, I would recommend IWB carry of an XDS .45 ACP. The flaws with this gun are muzzle rise and limited capacity, neither of which are as serious or life threatening as the flaws other small guns have. And the likelihood of a one stop shot is far higher, though with proper grip and a spare mag or two, you will be in the fight as long as needed. And the higher recoil will not be a problem at the time! There are grip enhancements available to improve comfort during the necesary practise sessions to achieve proficiency.

topgun wrote:
May 05, 2013

Well said Carl!Some gun is better than NO GUN.

Carl wrote:
May 02, 2013

Great... Yet ANOTHER caliber debate... Bottom line, if I ever have to draw my PPK/S (.380) or my Solo Carry (9mm)... My odds are INFINITELY better than NOT having either with me. My primary focus is and will always be to have some way to get myself & my family out of a situation. These choices are better than, say, throwing rocks... The caliber debate will NEVER go away... But carrying anything is better than not.

BigFoot wrote:
April 30, 2013

Scot_c: Good catch, that would be a lot of bullet-riddled bodies. Here are his words: "All of the autopsies I see aren't gunshot victims. Asked and answered six weeks ago on my May 18th post. As I clearly stated, some are naturals, some are SIDS, some are overdoses, etc. although there aren't many days that we don't have at least one gunshot victim. We do autopsies 6 days a week, I work on 5 of those days (and often 6), and on Monday morning I look over photos of the few that I might have missed from Saturday. Any bodies taken in on Sunday are rolled to Monday. And when I'm out of town often I'm at another ME's office observing autopsies there. Of course if you want to figure in the ones I saw (not worked on) in Kosovo and Bosnia we can bounce that number up much, much higher." According to that, maybe 300 to 600 gunshot bodies a year plus bodies at other Medical Examiner offices plus his experience in Kosovo and Bosnia. That certainly puts his credentials far ahead of anybody else's on this forum. Let me end this by summing up the calibers this way: If I told you that I ran ten straight one-shot stops with well-placed shots to the chest using a .380 you would say "No way, maybe one if you were lucky." Using a 9mm: "I can see two, maybe three, but forget ten straight." Using a .40: "Yeah, I could believe that." Using a .45: "So?"

Scot_c wrote:
April 29, 2013

Bigfoot - 8.2 autopsies 365 days a year...3,000 a year. Obviously not all homicides unless you're somewhere in Africa or the Middle East. So how many are gunshot fatalities? Faked up stats to try to establish credibility does nothing for your arguments.

Phil Ingalls wrote:
April 29, 2013

My Kel-Tec PF 9 is my daily carry. And doubles as a pocket gun. I don't leave home without.

Tom wrote:
April 29, 2013

I now carry a Diamonback Db9. Experience tells me that it takes lots of practice and the right load to hit the target with a small pistol. I too started out at 15 feet and worked out to about twice that. Accurately requires a steady hand and knowledge of how the gun shoots. I would also recommend shooting after exercise and from weird positions. Self defense situations get the heart rate up very quickly.

BigFoot wrote:
April 29, 2013

Bigger Foot, at least I brought some solid information to the party, what do you have to contribute to the knowledge base? Give us some hard facts to endorse your choice in a defensive weapon. Try to do better than "I like it and I read somewhere that it's good." Since most of you have probably never read about gunshot autopsies, I thought you would enjoy my post. Sorry, but when other people don't add their thoughts to a thread, it sure looks like you're hogging it.

noodles wrote:
April 29, 2013

Bigfoot's correct, bigger is better and penetration is very important.

Bigger Foot wrote:
April 27, 2013

There should definitely be a limit on how many messages paranoid, know-it-all, inviduals are allowed to send.

BigFoot wrote:
April 26, 2013

DENNER37 – Sorry, but that's not my diatribe. As I mentioned in the beginning, the article was written by a person that works in a morgue. The reason for posting it was to provide that most important requirement needed in the decision-making process: facts. Our daily dose of personal opinions from the gun magazines are counterproductive and confusing, at best, when it comes to sorting out our firearm needs in a logical manner. Here, on this site, if 100 shooters were asked which caliber and bullet is the best for self-defense there would be 100 different answers and none of them would be from personal experience. While opinions make for good conversation, wouldn't looking over the shoulder of a guy working on a corpse on an autopsy table in a morgue be a lot more meaningful when it came to buying a weapon whose only purpose was to save your life? If, after a zillion autopsies, it was clear that caliber X fails way to often while caliber Z gets the job done, wouldn't you want to know that before heading down to the gun store? #37, in all of your examples, as the morgue guy said, they will kill, but that's not the point. It's all about picking the round with the best chance of ending the fight with one good hit so you don't get shot. If, in your personal experience, your favorite round has a higher percentage of winning than his .45 when it comes to the butt-on-the-ground test, keep it. But I bet he has more experience in calling winners and losers than you do.

denner37 wrote:
April 25, 2013

Bigfoot, you're diatribe is nonsense. The ole 9mm vs .45 debate. 9mm Nato is a very effective round, it generally tumbles in human tissue, whereas the .45 ball does not. If you believe a Winchester Ranger 147 grain or HST is not right on the heals of any .40 or .45 loading you're mistaken. That 127 grain +p+ round is nothing to sneeze at either. You must be stuck in the 80's with the ballistics on the 115 grain silvertip ?

BigFoot wrote:
April 25, 2013

FOLLOWUP: Everybody should now feel very enlightened because they have just received a crash course in the terminal ballistics of defensive handguns. You have replaced theory with fact so now you know what works, what doesn't work, and why. I liked the suggestion to put bones in the ballistic gelatin to make the test more realistic. Not only could we see which bullets blasted through bone and then how far they penetrated but we could follow the trails in the gelatin of the lesser bullets that were deflected. His advice on arming for the worst possible situation makes sense. You don't want to take on a wide-body that's high on drugs and dressed like an Eskimo when you only brought a "pocket pistol" to the fight. Anyone for a 4-inch .44 Magnum? In all fairness to the .380 and 9mm, I don't think his argument is that they aren't killers, it's just that they can't be depended on. In his reference to the Army liking the .45 over the 9mm, he infers that the reason might be solely because of the hard ball ammunition they are required to use. But, from the FBI tests, we know that their 9mm used JHP so the 9mm fails with both JHP and hard ball when put up against the .45. Might makes right and that's where the big bores win the argument.

BigFoot wrote:
April 24, 2013

(PART 4) All things being equal, I suspect that a hit to the vitals with a 9mm ends the fight as quickly as an identical hit with a .45. At least in the autopsies I've seen I've never had any indication to the contrary. But that's not the point. Let me say it clearly here. In my humble opinion, the 9mm and .380 are more likely to fragment or be deflected into a non-vital area or to simply stop short of reaching the vital organs than a similarly-placed shot with a .45. It's all due to penetration. The reason so many folks wind up on the autopsy table with 9mm and .380 holes poked in 'em is because these two calibers are the ones most commonly carried by the BGs. It stands to reason that the more BGs that are carrying them, the more BGs that will wind up on the autopsy table with these rounds in them. And in most cases they work quite well. Let me make this clear. Still, as I said in a very recent post, there are a fair number of times when they don't, and these are the times that give me pause for thought. I realize that nothing is guaranteed regardless of caliber, but I've can't seem to remember a .45 that fragmented or failed to reach the vitals as a result of a deflected bullet but I can think of plenty of times when I've seen the .380 or 9mm do it. While we may argue the reasons, the fact is combat soldiers preferred the .45acp to the 9mm and the troops today want to get rid of the 9mm for a .45 based on their experiences. Special units that have the ability to buy weapons commercially have already bought .45acp pistols. These units express great satisfaction with the .45 and very little with the 9mm. This may be related to the fact they are required to use ball ammo and because they are limited to ball for political reasons, the .45 is all the better." If you want to read the entire article, go to http://www.gunthorp.com/Terminal%20Ballistics%20as%20viewed%20in%20a%20morgue.htm

BigFoot wrote:
April 24, 2013

(PART 3) Perhaps, like me, you think it much more likely you'll be set upon by 6' 12" 325LB Louie Packaload who just got paroled from the state pen (assault on a police officer and possession of a big fat bag of crack) and who comes equipped with a big knife and a fresh load of heroine, PCP, or meth (or some combination of the three with a few shots of Jack Daniels thrown in) pumped into his arm. Uh oh, did I bring the .380 or the .44 Mag? Maybe its winter time and Louie is well dressed with a heavy leather jacket, a sweater, and a heavy flannel shirt. Now, whatta YOU want to be pack'n? Hey, shoot me with a 9mm +P+ and I'm on my butt in a heartbeat. Shoot Louie with the same load and you've got one ticked off ex-con to deal with. Friends, I'm a big believer is safety margins and there isn't a bigger margin with a handgun than a 200-240 gr. JHP clipping along at 1200+ fps. From empirical observation of what comes across the autopsy table, I've noticed MANY times that the 9mm or .380 strikes bone and is deflected into a non-vital area, never reaching vital organs. And I've seen it with multiple shots on occasion. Other times the 9mm or .380 will fragment before reaching the vitals or just plain haul up short. Whatever the reason, often times adequate penetration needed to reach vital organs is not achieved and the fight continues. Much of this, I think, is related primarily to bullet weight with the 9mm typically weighing about half of the .45. As I think I've said before, I don't think I've ever seen a .45 fail to penetrate adequately, and it's for that reason that it's my carry weapon. Time and time again I've seen the venerable .45 just keep plowing along, busting up bone instead of skipping off of it or being stopped by it. If it's headed in the direction of the vital organs, there isn't much that's going to deter it from its intended target.

BigFoot wrote:
April 24, 2013

(PART 2) Try it again, and I think you'll see that this impressive wound cavity that's so often seen in ballistic gelatin goes down the tubes. Bone is in the body for basically two reasons-to give support as with the legs and spinal column and to protect major organs, such as the ribs protecting the heart or the skull protecting the brain. Skip a bullet off a support bone, such as the leg, and the BG will keep shooting. Break it, like you generally do with a .40 or .45, and the BG is going to hit the pavement and your chances of survival increase dramatically. It's the same with a shot to the chest. Skip a 9mm off the sternum (breastbone) and the fight continues; plow through the sternum with a .45 and, trust me, the fight is over. I'm just convinced that all things being equal, bigger is better when it comes to bullet size. As for the .22, it's a poor choice of weapons and probably about the last one I would choose if given a choice of calibers. Still, it's a caliber we see quite frequently, and it might be good to know what damage it imparts. Discussing it is in no way an endorsement of it. The reason it's such a poor choice of a defensive weapon by now should be obvious. If you think 125 grains of 9mm has little stopping power, try 40 grains of .22 long rifle. It has been my experience that hollow point .22 long rifle bullets fired from handguns seldom mushroom; when fired from rifles they usually do. This whole business of what caliber/bullet/load to carry for self-defense has been talked to death (pun intended) but that never stops me from joining in and offering my 2 cents worth. I always like to ask people about their expectations during a criminal attack. Do you expect to be attacked by 5' 4" 110LB 75 year old Mrs. Jones with her "attack umbrella"? Hey, stick that pellet gun in your belt and be on your way.

BigFoot wrote:
April 24, 2013

(PART 1) But will they save your life? I have posted evaluations from the FBI and the Military on the .38 and 9mm and thought you would like to read this. The following are assorted quotes from a very long article that was written by a person who works in a morgue. "I see an average of 8.2 autopsies per day/365 days per year, and I can tell you that when the chips are down, there's nothing that beats a 12-gauge. As for handguns, the name of the game is not only shot placement but how a properly-placed bullet acts once it gets there. I've seen folks killed by a bb to the eye and others survive after being hit by several well-placed rounds with a 9mm. As for me, I'll take a slow-moving .45 to a gun fight any day. I absolutely despise a 9mm for defensive situations (yes, they will eventually kill but often not quickly enough to prevent the BG from doing you in first) and a .380 as well. These are probably the two calibers I see most often on the autopsy table. So let me give a few thoughts here. First, as you've pretty well guessed by now, I'm a big fan of the .40 and .45 for personal defense, and for the same reasons. They're both big, slow-moving bullets. Of the two, I think big is more important. As I've said before, I want something that will plow through bone and keep going, not skip off of it. I can't tell you how many times I've seen a .380 or 9mm strike bone on a well-placed shot and skip off in a non-vital direction, leaving the BG free to return fire. With the .40 and .45, this seldom happens. Ballistic gelatin, being all that's available for most bullet testing, is good as far as it goes but it's often far different from what we see in the morgue. A far more realistic scenario would be to dress up ballistic gelatin with a heavy coat of denim to mimic blue jeans, embed some bones obtained from a butcher shop, and throw in a few objects of varying densities to mimic organs.

Chasman122 wrote:
April 23, 2013

..I have just recently acquired two (pocket pistols)from my stepdad..I really find this article informative and will start practicing asap thanks

GENE INGALLS wrote:
April 23, 2013

I JUST PURCHASED A RUGER LCR .357 MAG. HAVING FIRED IT 30 TIMES SINCE, I AM IMPRESSED WITH THE ACCURACY, BUT IT TAKES PRACTICE WITH TRIGGER PULL & STEADY AIM. I WAS SHOOTING AT 45/50 FT. 10" BULLS EYE. I AM 83 YRS. OLD.