Rifles

Understanding .327 Federal Mag. Ballistics

The .327 Federal Mag. is not a better approach to achieving terminal performance; it’s just a different approach.

From the moment Federal announced the .327 Federal Mag., Internet experts and gun goobers discounted it as another pip-squeak cartridge. Some folks just don’t understand external and terminal ballistics. The performance of any cartridge is dictated by physics, not by perception, prejudice or pontification. The laws of physics apply equally to all bullets while in flight, while penetrating a magnificent buck or while punching through a homicidal maniac.

Penetration is dictated by bullet weight, impact velocity and expanded diameter. All things equal; faster, heavier and smaller (in diameter) bullets penetrate deeper. Tissue destruction is more difficult to predict. Velocity, expansion and energy transfer are the best indicators. Generally, with bullets that penetrate to the same depth, those moving the fastest and exhibiting the largest expansion factor will damage the most tissue.

A .327 Federal Mag. bullet is initially 0.045” smaller in diameter than a 9 mm or .357 Mag. bullet—that’s about the thickness of a potato chip. The .327 Federal Mag. also uses lighter bullets launched at higher velocities. Bullets currently available in factory ammunition retain their weight well and expand at a higher ratio than many .357 Mag. projectiles. (This is the advanced bullet technology touted in advertising and often scoffed at by armchair ballisticians.) This means the .327 Federal Mag.’s projectiles will penetrate similar to 125- and 158-gr. hollow-point bullets from .357 Mag. loads. It also means they are very likely going to damage more tissue because of the higher impact velocities and greater expansion factor. The 115-gr. Gold Dot .312 bullet expands to more than twice its original diameter.

I tested the terminal ballistics of three .327 Federal factory loads and one handload in 10 percent ordnance gelatin, and when compared to hundreds of other handgun and rifle loads I’ve also tested, it’s clear the cartridge has the right stuff for coyotes, deer and even felonious fiends. High velocity combined with some of the best expansion factors you will find, matched with ruggedly constructed bullets are what makes this possible. With regard to external ballistics, all .327 Federal Mag. factory loads drop less than 6” at 100 yds. if sighted in at 25 yds.

One downside to the .327 Federal Mag. is that there are only three factory loads available. Another disadvantage is that most 0.312”-diameter component bullets won’t hold up to the high impact velocities. Currently, Federal and Speer are the only companies offering loaded ammunition, and Hornady’s 100-gr. XTP is about the only component bullet that will not disintegrate or over-expand when impacting at violent speeds. But that is changing. New for 2010, Federal has an 85-gr. jacketed soft point load and Speer a new 100-gr. Gold Dot load. Both the 100- and 115-gr. Gold Dot bullets should be available for handloaders very soon.

The .327 Federal Mag. is not a better approach to achieving terminal performance; it’s just a different approach. Some like big bullets that lumber along and some like medium size bullets that move a bit faster. If like me, you believe in the attributes of lighter bullets that radically expand and impact at lightning-like speeds, the .327 Federal Mag. might soon become your favorite revolver cartridge, too.

Share |

Comments

ADD YOUR COMMENT

Enter your comments below, they will appear within 24 hours


Your Name


Your Email


Your Comment

17 Responses to Understanding .327 Federal Mag. Ballistics

Tango Delta wrote:
June 02, 2013

I have all 3 of Ruger's 327 offerings. Excellent revos and a very potent cartridge. With Federal 100gr American Eagle out of my 5.5" bbl blackhawk I get over 1700fps muzzle velocity. That's over 640 ft-lbs of energy. The 327 is a very potent round. Also I'm very glad I don't live in California or any of the other liberal leaning states. All I can say is fight any 2nd amendment infringement.

Varmonter wrote:
May 05, 2013

have one of these in a ruger sp101..sweet lil wheelgun.i think marlin is missing the mark in not cambering a lever gun for this round.

Jimbob wrote:
April 12, 2013

Aaam yaa we've heard of the internet. Have YOU heard that not all states have the same laws?! Not all states allow purchase via internet!

Pokey wrote:
September 26, 2012

I load my own. Bullets are not hard to find, but brass has been. When I found some Federal brass I cleaned them out and got 300 cases to work with. These should last me for about 6-8 reloads so I am about 1600 rounds short of needing to buy more brass. Starline has indicated they are making brass for the 327 Fed Mag now, but I haven't seen any yet. Starline brass is good for 8-10 loadings in .41 Magnum, so I will go to that brand when I see some available.

Dave wrote:
April 23, 2012

Yes, I also buy my .327 ammo online as well. The American Eagle ran out but I bought the Speer Gold Dot. Usaully not a problem getting it online.

Rob Fano wrote:
March 16, 2012

I live in Wyoming and several sports stores carry the .327 ammo is not an issue, but there is an ammo spot in Lander and in Montana that offers reloaders the opportunity to reload with 125 grain bullet--This is a nice caliber for carry in the mountains when camping or hunting

Michael wrote:
January 06, 2012

For anyone complaining about not being able to buy ammo all I can say is this: "Ever hear of the internet"? I buy all my .327 ammo online and can find it everywhere....

.327 user wrote:
August 30, 2011

I own both 357 and 327, and like the 327 allot better. I have always thought that 357 was too big and lumbering for the amount of bullet you have to shoot. So I preffered the 22 mag that is a much more versatile bullet for hunting. Then I heard about the 327, i got one and i love it. It shoots more accurately and farther than my 357, and kills allot better. The 327 is the perfect inbetween of 22mag and 357. 22mag has too little of a bullet and 357 has too big a bullet. Iv put it through allot of use on different animals and targets, and it has done better than i could have ever imagined. Everything about this caliber is practicle, even how they can fit 8 bullets where they would usually put only 6 22lr bullets! So in conclusion I have always felt 357 bullets were too heavy and innacurate at longer distances. But 22mags fly strait, far, and accurate, but sometimes lack enough bullet to actually kill what you need. So for a pistole caliber, I think one of the most well rounded and versitile bullets I'v found is the 327mag. For people that actually use guns in a day to day operation, I think the 327 is a very reliable caliber. Strait shooting and accurate, far shooting, and very good penatration with enough bullet to tear something up. P.S. I'v found most people can only shoot a pistole about 10 yards and hope to hit anything, so in those cases maybe they should go with the 357 since it probably has more stopping power for self defense against human flesh.

Jim Mullin wrote:
August 24, 2011

Why haven't i bought a 327 federal handgun yet? There is no reason why ammunition for the 327 federal should not be sold in 50 and 100 round boxes at prices comparable to 38 special or 9mm luger rounds in the same quantities.When ammo companies give the cartridge better "backing",when the consumer knows that the 327 is not like the 480 Ruger,then they and i may buy one.I like the idea of Ruger's 8 shot single action.What could they fit into a Redhawk? 10?12?

.357Magnum wrote:
July 16, 2011

I really love this Ruger SP101 in .327 Federal Magnum! According to Speer, the 115 grain Gold Dot leaves the 3-1/16 barrel at 1386 fps (backed up by a chronograph that I saw). That is almost 500 ft-lbs of muzzle energy (491 ft-lbs). Coupled with the expansion of the bullet which is around .55 to .61 inches, you have ballistical imprint very similar to a .357 Sig! .357 Sig stopping power (which is about 10-20% shy of full house .357 magnum--a.k.a Double-Tap, Buffalo Bore, etc) is still very very potent! I can shoot this gun one-handed very accurately all day...lol The Ruger SP101 in .327 Federal Magnum is my favorite conceal carry weapon among all my others---.357 mag, .45 ACP, .44 special, .40 S&W. As the above article stated, terminal ballistics (Newtonian Physics) are the deciding factor in this cartridges hard hitting power and very flat trajectory. It is a fabulous new cartridge introduced within the last 4 years and ranks among the best.

Z Trick wrote:
July 03, 2011

I have one in the Ruger Blackhawk. I absolutely love it. I do reload so ammo isn't a problem for me. I got lucky! One of the local shops had almost a 1000 brass for the 327 and it's now mine. I figure ammo or not... the more we buy, the more the ammo companies will notice. The 327 and the 32H&R Mag are way under rated and under noticed!

327.jm wrote:
February 11, 2011

I got this gun and I love it. I can get the 85 and 100 grain jacketed soft point, for target shooting. A big savings over the hydro-shock personal defense rounds.

R. Vail wrote:
February 09, 2011

As the owner of two .327 revolvers, I DO love both of mine !!! It took me a couple of years & over a dozen gun shows to finally find the guns. Now, I have even, eventually, gotten a dealer in Fairbanks, AK. to stock the ammo for me !!! What more could I ask for ??

357ccw wrote:
January 27, 2011

i too have had the same issue with ammo for this weapon which i wanted to buy badly.but with little to no ammo local i could not even find the gun local or any shop that knew anything about it sooo... i opted for the 38spl/357mag i stillmay purchase a 327 fed if and when ammo/guns become "mainstream"

Socalman wrote:
November 27, 2010

Several months back I went to the range and shot a friend's .327. It was a very sweet handling firearm. I began to do some research on purchasing my own. Like another reader posted, I checked with five shops and 2 chains and none arried the .327 ammo. Okay, I buy a great deal of ammo online and I find that the .327 will end up costing me over $1 per shot when I factor in shipping. To top that off, I am in California and will not be able to purchase online after Jan. 2011. If I can begin to find the ammo stocked in shops, I will buy the gun. Until then, I can not afford a $600 paper weight. I'll stick to shooting 38 from my .357.

M.S. Mallory wrote:
October 26, 2010

I also was very interested in this cartridge until I checked with 7 or 8 shops as to availability. It's near impossible to find let alone find in the config you might want. That translates into higher prices if and when you find and or order what you want. I opted for the ubiquitous .38 Special.

C.M.Glenn wrote:
October 22, 2010

Thanks for the info as I am training my daughter and have been interested in the ability of this size load as a self defense ammo. I will follow up and watch for coming improvements. I use Gold Dot .38 spcl loads for my wife as home defense loads and am confident in the ability to do the job. I will test my daughter and her ability to handle each before purchasing the .327. I believe in the .38 and have those revolvers. Thanks again for this review.